华西口腔医学杂志
華西口腔醫學雜誌
화서구강의학잡지
WEST CHINA JOURNAL OF STOMATOLOGY
2014年
1期
85-90
,共6页
鲁颖娟%常少海%伍虹%余艳崧%叶玉珊%常岚茹%王为
魯穎娟%常少海%伍虹%餘豔崧%葉玉珊%常嵐茹%王為
로영연%상소해%오홍%여염숭%협옥산%상람여%왕위
有限元分析%微种植体%长度%直径%优化设计
有限元分析%微種植體%長度%直徑%優化設計
유한원분석%미충식체%장도%직경%우화설계
finite element analysis%mini implant%length%diameter%optimization
目的: 探讨在不同力作用下,长度和直径同时连续变化情况下微种植体尺寸的优化设计,以期为临床上合理选择微种植体尺寸提供理论基础。方法 建立长度和直径连续变化的微种植体及周围颌骨组织的三维有限元模型,设定长度变化范围为6~12 mm,直径变化范围为1.2~2.0 mm,在微种植体头部的横槽内分别加载水平力(HF)和复合力(CF),观察长度和直径同时变化对周围颌骨等效应力峰值(Max EQV)及微种植体位移峰值(Max DM)的影响。结果 在两种力的作用下,随着长度和直径的增加,颌骨Max EQV和微种植体Max DM均下降,当长度大于9 mm时,各评估指标值较小且变化幅度较小。灵敏度分析显示,直径对评估指标的影响较大。在CF作用下,直径对评估指标的影响较HF作用下显著。结论 在本研究所设定的参数范围内,微种植体的长度应不超过9 mm,运用微种植体对牙齿进行转矩控制时,其直径应超过1.2 mm。
目的: 探討在不同力作用下,長度和直徑同時連續變化情況下微種植體呎吋的優化設計,以期為臨床上閤理選擇微種植體呎吋提供理論基礎。方法 建立長度和直徑連續變化的微種植體及週圍頜骨組織的三維有限元模型,設定長度變化範圍為6~12 mm,直徑變化範圍為1.2~2.0 mm,在微種植體頭部的橫槽內分彆加載水平力(HF)和複閤力(CF),觀察長度和直徑同時變化對週圍頜骨等效應力峰值(Max EQV)及微種植體位移峰值(Max DM)的影響。結果 在兩種力的作用下,隨著長度和直徑的增加,頜骨Max EQV和微種植體Max DM均下降,噹長度大于9 mm時,各評估指標值較小且變化幅度較小。靈敏度分析顯示,直徑對評估指標的影響較大。在CF作用下,直徑對評估指標的影響較HF作用下顯著。結論 在本研究所設定的參數範圍內,微種植體的長度應不超過9 mm,運用微種植體對牙齒進行轉矩控製時,其直徑應超過1.2 mm。
목적: 탐토재불동력작용하,장도화직경동시련속변화정황하미충식체척촌적우화설계,이기위림상상합리선택미충식체척촌제공이론기출。방법 건립장도화직경련속변화적미충식체급주위합골조직적삼유유한원모형,설정장도변화범위위6~12 mm,직경변화범위위1.2~2.0 mm,재미충식체두부적횡조내분별가재수평력(HF)화복합력(CF),관찰장도화직경동시변화대주위합골등효응력봉치(Max EQV)급미충식체위이봉치(Max DM)적영향。결과 재량충력적작용하,수착장도화직경적증가,합골Max EQV화미충식체Max DM균하강,당장도대우9 mm시,각평고지표치교소차변화폭도교소。령민도분석현시,직경대평고지표적영향교대。재CF작용하,직경대평고지표적영향교HF작용하현저。결론 재본연구소설정적삼수범위내,미충식체적장도응불초과9 mm,운용미충식체대아치진행전구공제시,기직경응초과1.2 mm。
Objective To investigate the effect of different length and diameters on the stability of mini implant and to select optimal length and diameter using continuous variation of parameters. Methods To perform 3-dimensional finite element analysis, finite element models of a maxilla, and mini implants with length of 6-12 mm and diameters of 1.2-2.0 mm were generated. Load of two different forces were applied to the head of mini implant. One type was horizontal force (HF), the other was composite force (CF). The maximum equivalent stress (Max EQV) in maxilla and the maximum displacement (Max DM) of mini implant were evaluated. Results The Max EQV in maxilla and Max DM of mini implant decreased as length and diameter increased. When length was more than 9 mm, the evaluation indexes were small and had a less change. Datas indicated that diameter played a more important role in reducing target, and was a more effective parameter in re-ducing Max EQV when CF was loaded. Conclusion From biomechanical point of view, the choice of the length should not be more than 9 mm. When CF is loaded using the mini implant, diameter exceeding 1.2 mm are optimal design for mini implant.