原子能科学技术
原子能科學技術
원자능과학기술
ATOMIC ENERGY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
2014年
2期
251-256
,共6页
李淞%齐少璞%马晓%冯预恒
李淞%齊少璞%馬曉%馮預恆
리송%제소박%마효%풍예항
中国实验快堆%小栅板联箱%数值模拟%管脚布置
中國實驗快堆%小柵闆聯箱%數值模擬%管腳佈置
중국실험쾌퇴%소책판련상%수치모의%관각포치
China Experimental Fast Reactor%throttle structure%numerical simulation%arrangement of pin
为提高堆芯流量分配的精度,通过CFD数值模拟软件CFX ,应用标准 k-ε湍流模型及SIM PLE算法对中国实验快堆1型小栅板联箱、节流件及流量1区管脚的流量分配进行三维数值模拟。在已有研究基础上,模拟过程中考虑了材料的壁面效应对压降的影响,使模拟工况更接近实验真实情况。与已有实验结果进行对比时,考虑了重力压降、沿程压降及局部压降,对模拟结果进行了系统误差修正。由计算结果可知:节流件及小栅板联箱的压降计算结果与修正后的水力台架实验结果符合较好。在本文的管脚布置情况下,1、5、6号组件的平均流量比2、3、4、7号组件的平均流量低3.8%。根据模拟计算结果可更准确地预测堆内最热管的流量分配情况,可为今后的水力实验提供参考。
為提高堆芯流量分配的精度,通過CFD數值模擬軟件CFX ,應用標準 k-ε湍流模型及SIM PLE算法對中國實驗快堆1型小柵闆聯箱、節流件及流量1區管腳的流量分配進行三維數值模擬。在已有研究基礎上,模擬過程中攷慮瞭材料的壁麵效應對壓降的影響,使模擬工況更接近實驗真實情況。與已有實驗結果進行對比時,攷慮瞭重力壓降、沿程壓降及跼部壓降,對模擬結果進行瞭繫統誤差脩正。由計算結果可知:節流件及小柵闆聯箱的壓降計算結果與脩正後的水力檯架實驗結果符閤較好。在本文的管腳佈置情況下,1、5、6號組件的平均流量比2、3、4、7號組件的平均流量低3.8%。根據模擬計算結果可更準確地預測堆內最熱管的流量分配情況,可為今後的水力實驗提供參攷。
위제고퇴심류량분배적정도,통과CFD수치모의연건CFX ,응용표준 k-ε단류모형급SIM PLE산법대중국실험쾌퇴1형소책판련상、절류건급류량1구관각적류량분배진행삼유수치모의。재이유연구기출상,모의과정중고필료재료적벽면효응대압강적영향,사모의공황경접근실험진실정황。여이유실험결과진행대비시,고필료중력압강、연정압강급국부압강,대모의결과진행료계통오차수정。유계산결과가지:절류건급소책판련상적압강계산결과여수정후적수력태가실험결과부합교호。재본문적관각포치정황하,1、5、6호조건적평균류량비2、3、4、7호조건적평균류량저3.8%。근거모의계산결과가경준학지예측퇴내최열관적류량분배정황,가위금후적수력실험제공삼고。
In order to improve the precision of the reactor core flow distribution , the CFX code was used to simulate the three-dimensional flow through type-1 throttle structure ,throttle structure and flow 1 zone pin in China Experimental Fast Reactor based on standard k-εturbulence model and SIMPLE algorithm .The effect of the wall surface of the material on the pressure drop was taken into account during the simulation process in order to further approach the real situation in the experiment .The gravity pressure drop and pressure drop along the path as well as the local pressure drop were regarded as experimental system error correction when the numerical results were compared with the available experimental results .The results show that the simulation results and experimental results after reasonable correction are in good agreement .The average outlet flow in pin 1 ,5 and 6 is 3.8% lower than the average outlet flow in pin 2 ,3 ,4 and 7 .Not only the flow distribution in the hottest tube can be more accurately determined ,but also the reference for the future hydraulic bench test is figured out according to the simulation results .