河北中医
河北中醫
하북중의
HEBEI JORNAL OF TRADITIONAL CHINESE MEDICINE
2014年
6期
954-956
,共3页
赵晔%李书奎%李维彬%程才%刘志伟
趙曄%李書奎%李維彬%程纔%劉誌偉
조엽%리서규%리유빈%정재%류지위
骨折%胸椎%腰椎%外科手术,微创性
骨摺%胸椎%腰椎%外科手術,微創性
골절%흉추%요추%외과수술,미창성
Fracture%Thoracic vertebra%Lumbar vertebra%Surgery%Minimally invasive
目的:观察Quadrant系统微创治疗胸腰椎骨折的临床疗效。方法将39例胸腰椎骨折患者随机分为2组,治疗组20例采用Quadrant系统进行微创手术治疗,对照组19例采用传统手术方法。比较2组手术各项指标,包括切口长度、术中出血及手术时间;所有病例均随访10~48个月,根据视觉模拟评分( VAS)方法评价手术前后腰痛程度;应用Prolo问卷评价临床疗效。结果2组手术切口长度、手术时间、术中出血量比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01)。末次随访时治疗组手术疗效优良率89.5%,对照组90.0%,2组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),2组疗效相近;治疗组术后1周VAS评分低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论应用Quadrant系统微创手术创伤小,痛苦轻、恢复快、疗效佳患者易于接受。
目的:觀察Quadrant繫統微創治療胸腰椎骨摺的臨床療效。方法將39例胸腰椎骨摺患者隨機分為2組,治療組20例採用Quadrant繫統進行微創手術治療,對照組19例採用傳統手術方法。比較2組手術各項指標,包括切口長度、術中齣血及手術時間;所有病例均隨訪10~48箇月,根據視覺模擬評分( VAS)方法評價手術前後腰痛程度;應用Prolo問捲評價臨床療效。結果2組手術切口長度、手術時間、術中齣血量比較差異均有統計學意義(P<0.01)。末次隨訪時治療組手術療效優良率89.5%,對照組90.0%,2組比較差異無統計學意義(P>0.05),2組療效相近;治療組術後1週VAS評分低于對照組(P<0.05)。結論應用Quadrant繫統微創手術創傷小,痛苦輕、恢複快、療效佳患者易于接受。
목적:관찰Quadrant계통미창치료흉요추골절적림상료효。방법장39례흉요추골절환자수궤분위2조,치료조20례채용Quadrant계통진행미창수술치료,대조조19례채용전통수술방법。비교2조수술각항지표,포괄절구장도、술중출혈급수술시간;소유병례균수방10~48개월,근거시각모의평분( VAS)방법평개수술전후요통정도;응용Prolo문권평개림상료효。결과2조수술절구장도、수술시간、술중출혈량비교차이균유통계학의의(P<0.01)。말차수방시치료조수술료효우량솔89.5%,대조조90.0%,2조비교차이무통계학의의(P>0.05),2조료효상근;치료조술후1주VAS평분저우대조조(P<0.05)。결론응용Quadrant계통미창수술창상소,통고경、회복쾌、료효가환자역우접수。
Objective To investigate the surgical therapeutic effect of thoracolumbar fracture treated by min -imally invasive surgery with Quadrant system .Method Select thirty-nine patients with thoracolumbar fracture .All 39 cases were randomly divided into two groups , 20 cases received operations with Quadrant system in group A , and the others with traditional operation in group B .According to the visual analogy method ( VAS) , Prolo standard , the clinical outcome was evaluated , and compared the index , including the length of incision , the bleeding volume , and the operation time.All cases were followed 10-48 months.Results There was significant difference between two groups on the length of incision, the bleeding volume, the operation time (P<0.01).Excellent rate of surgery in treatment group last follow -up was 89.5%, and 90.0% in control group.There was no significant difference be-tween two groups (P>0.05).VAS score after a week of operation in treatment group was lower than that in control group (P<0.05).Conclusion The therapeutic outcome of the two groups is similar .But the surgery trauma is smal-ler by using Quadrant system , and pain is lighter , recovering faster , the minimally invasive surgery applicating Quad-rant system is a better way for thoracolumbar fracture patients .