重庆医学
重慶醫學
중경의학
CHONGQING MEDICAL JOURNAL
2014年
4期
451-453
,共3页
王舒莹%李晓明%刘震岳%张建民
王舒瑩%李曉明%劉震嶽%張建民
왕서형%리효명%류진악%장건민
浓缩血小板%汇集白膜层法%质量分析
濃縮血小闆%彙集白膜層法%質量分析
농축혈소판%회집백막층법%질량분석
platelet concentrate%pooled buffy coats%quality analysis
目的:比较3种不同模式汇集白膜层(PBC )法制备浓缩血小板(PC )的质量及保存效果。方法使用3种不同模式PBC法制备PC ,依据获得PC的模式不同分为即时PBC组、白膜法(BC )室温过夜组和全血(WB )室温过夜组,所有制备的PC过滤白细胞用血小板添加液(2/3PAS-ⅢM+1/3血浆)保存。比较3组PC在(22±2)℃保存7 d内血小板含量、红细胞残留量、血小板聚集功能、CD62p阳性表达率、抗低渗休克(HSR)能力、pH值及细菌生长等指标。结果与即时PBC组相比,在保存期7 d内BC室温过夜组血小板含量更高且能改善血小板聚集功能,而红细胞残留量、CD62p阳性表达率、HSR能力、pH 值及细菌生长等指标无明显差异;与即时PBC组相比,在保存期7 d内WB室温过夜组血小板含量更高且血小板HSR能力也更强,而红细胞残留量、血小板聚集功能、CD62p阳性表达率、pH 值及细菌生长等指标两组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 BC室温过夜、PBC法和WB室温过夜PBC法均能安全、可靠、方便地制备PC ,且均可代替即时PBC法制备PC。
目的:比較3種不同模式彙集白膜層(PBC )法製備濃縮血小闆(PC )的質量及保存效果。方法使用3種不同模式PBC法製備PC ,依據穫得PC的模式不同分為即時PBC組、白膜法(BC )室溫過夜組和全血(WB )室溫過夜組,所有製備的PC過濾白細胞用血小闆添加液(2/3PAS-ⅢM+1/3血漿)保存。比較3組PC在(22±2)℃保存7 d內血小闆含量、紅細胞殘留量、血小闆聚集功能、CD62p暘性錶達率、抗低滲休剋(HSR)能力、pH值及細菌生長等指標。結果與即時PBC組相比,在保存期7 d內BC室溫過夜組血小闆含量更高且能改善血小闆聚集功能,而紅細胞殘留量、CD62p暘性錶達率、HSR能力、pH 值及細菌生長等指標無明顯差異;與即時PBC組相比,在保存期7 d內WB室溫過夜組血小闆含量更高且血小闆HSR能力也更彊,而紅細胞殘留量、血小闆聚集功能、CD62p暘性錶達率、pH 值及細菌生長等指標兩組差異無統計學意義(P>0.05)。結論 BC室溫過夜、PBC法和WB室溫過夜PBC法均能安全、可靠、方便地製備PC ,且均可代替即時PBC法製備PC。
목적:비교3충불동모식회집백막층(PBC )법제비농축혈소판(PC )적질량급보존효과。방법사용3충불동모식PBC법제비PC ,의거획득PC적모식불동분위즉시PBC조、백막법(BC )실온과야조화전혈(WB )실온과야조,소유제비적PC과려백세포용혈소판첨가액(2/3PAS-ⅢM+1/3혈장)보존。비교3조PC재(22±2)℃보존7 d내혈소판함량、홍세포잔류량、혈소판취집공능、CD62p양성표체솔、항저삼휴극(HSR)능력、pH치급세균생장등지표。결과여즉시PBC조상비,재보존기7 d내BC실온과야조혈소판함량경고차능개선혈소판취집공능,이홍세포잔류량、CD62p양성표체솔、HSR능력、pH 치급세균생장등지표무명현차이;여즉시PBC조상비,재보존기7 d내WB실온과야조혈소판함량경고차혈소판HSR능력야경강,이홍세포잔류량、혈소판취집공능、CD62p양성표체솔、pH 치급세균생장등지표량조차이무통계학의의(P>0.05)。결론 BC실온과야、PBC법화WB실온과야PBC법균능안전、가고、방편지제비PC ,차균가대체즉시PBC법제비PC。
Objective To compare the quality and preservation effect among the three models of pooled buffy coats (PBC) in pre-paring the platelet concentrate (PC) .Methods 63 identical ABO blood donations were randomly and averagely divided into three groups :the immediate PBC group(n=21) ,the buffy coats(BC) group(n=21) and the whole blood(WB) group(n=21) .In the im-mediate PBC group ,both the separation of the BC and the preparation of the PC was finished in the first day after collecting the WB;in the BC group ,the separation of BC was executed in the first day after collecting the WB ,while the preparation of the PC was completed in the second day ;in the WB group ,both the separation of the BC and the preparation of the PC was implement in the second day after collecting the WB .All the prepared PC were storage at (22 ± 2) ℃ for seven days in the preservation solution (composed by 2/3 PAS-ⅢM and 1/3 plasma) .Then compare the platelet(PLT) counts ,the red blood cell(RBC) residual quanti-ties ,the aggregative function of PLT ,the positive expression rates of CD62p ,the capability of hypotonic shock response(HSR) ,the PH value and the bacterial growth among PCs prepared by the three models during the stored time .Results Compared the immedi-ate PBC group during the seven stored days ,the PLT counts of the BC and WB groups were more ,the aggregative function of PLT in the BC group was better and the capability of HSR in the WB group was stronger ,but the other indexs between the immediate PBC group and the BC or WB group were no significant difference(P>0 .05) .Conclusion Both an overnight holding of BC and WB at room temperature models of PBC to prepare the PC are safe ,reliable and convenient ,and they could be substitute for the immedi-ate PBC model to prepare the PC .