中国介入心脏病学杂志
中國介入心髒病學雜誌
중국개입심장병학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY
2014年
6期
361-364
,共4页
叶剑飞%郑伟峰%张茗茗%劢波%茅焕豪%刘晓凯
葉劍飛%鄭偉峰%張茗茗%勱波%茅煥豪%劉曉凱
협검비%정위봉%장명명%매파%모환호%류효개
急性冠状动脉综合征%急诊经皮冠状动脉介入治疗%桡动脉%血栓抽吸
急性冠狀動脈綜閤徵%急診經皮冠狀動脈介入治療%橈動脈%血栓抽吸
급성관상동맥종합정%급진경피관상동맥개입치료%뇨동맥%혈전추흡
Acute coronary syndrome%Primary coronary interventional therapy%Trans-radial pathway%Thrombus aspiration
目的:评价经桡动脉血栓抽吸在血栓负荷过重急性冠状动脉综合征急诊经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)中的应用效果、安全性和可行性。方法选择符合急诊PCI治疗条件的急性冠状动脉综合征患者56例,将PCI中应用ThrombusterⅡ血栓抽吸导管的31例作为试验组,未应用血栓抽吸导管的25例患者作为对照组。比较两组患者住院期间主要不良心脏事件(MACE)的发生率、术后1周左心室射血分数(LVEF)和左心室舒张末期内径(LVEDD)、手术前后的心肌梗死TIMI血流情况。结果试验组患者住院期间总MACE发生率(3.3%)低于对照组(12.0%),两组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);试验组术后TIMI Ⅲ级与出院前LVEF值高于对照组,两组间的差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);但两组间LVEDD的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论初步结果提示,血栓抽吸结合经桡动脉直接PCI操作简单,有较好的安全性、可行性。
目的:評價經橈動脈血栓抽吸在血栓負荷過重急性冠狀動脈綜閤徵急診經皮冠狀動脈介入治療(PCI)中的應用效果、安全性和可行性。方法選擇符閤急診PCI治療條件的急性冠狀動脈綜閤徵患者56例,將PCI中應用ThrombusterⅡ血栓抽吸導管的31例作為試驗組,未應用血栓抽吸導管的25例患者作為對照組。比較兩組患者住院期間主要不良心髒事件(MACE)的髮生率、術後1週左心室射血分數(LVEF)和左心室舒張末期內徑(LVEDD)、手術前後的心肌梗死TIMI血流情況。結果試驗組患者住院期間總MACE髮生率(3.3%)低于對照組(12.0%),兩組間差異有統計學意義(P<0.05);試驗組術後TIMI Ⅲ級與齣院前LVEF值高于對照組,兩組間的差異有統計學意義(P<0.05);但兩組間LVEDD的差異無統計學意義(P>0.05)。結論初步結果提示,血栓抽吸結閤經橈動脈直接PCI操作簡單,有較好的安全性、可行性。
목적:평개경뇨동맥혈전추흡재혈전부하과중급성관상동맥종합정급진경피관상동맥개입치료(PCI)중적응용효과、안전성화가행성。방법선택부합급진PCI치료조건적급성관상동맥종합정환자56례,장PCI중응용ThrombusterⅡ혈전추흡도관적31례작위시험조,미응용혈전추흡도관적25례환자작위대조조。비교량조환자주원기간주요불양심장사건(MACE)적발생솔、술후1주좌심실사혈분수(LVEF)화좌심실서장말기내경(LVEDD)、수술전후적심기경사TIMI혈류정황。결과시험조환자주원기간총MACE발생솔(3.3%)저우대조조(12.0%),량조간차이유통계학의의(P<0.05);시험조술후TIMI Ⅲ급여출원전LVEF치고우대조조,량조간적차이유통계학의의(P<0.05);단량조간LVEDD적차이무통계학의의(P>0.05)。결론초보결과제시,혈전추흡결합경뇨동맥직접PCI조작간단,유교호적안전성、가행성。
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness, safety and feasibility of the application of trans-radial thrombus aspiration in patient with heavy burden of thrombus receiving primary coronary interventional therapy. Methods 56 patients with acute coronary syndrome receiving primary coronary interventional therapy were enrolled and randomized to two groups. 31 patients received therapy of thrombus aspiration by Thrombuster II, while 25 patients received routine coronary interventional therapy. We compared the rate of major adverse cardiac event (MACE) in hospital, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) one week post procedure and left ventricular end diastolic diameter (LVEDD), TIMI frame before and after procedure between two groups. Results The rate of MACE was signiifcantly (P<0.05) lower in patients receiving thrombus aspiration (3.3%) compared with routine PCI group (12.0%). LVEF and the rate of patients with TIMI Ⅲafter procedure were signiifcantly (P < 0.05) higher in patients receiving thrombus aspiration. There’s no significant difference in LVEDD between two groups. Conclusions There lies good safety and feasibility for applying thrombus aspiration combining direct PCI in patient with heavy burden of thrombus.