首都医药
首都醫藥
수도의약
CAPITAL MEDICINE
2014年
2期
12-14
,共3页
黄宝良%孔祥录%刘建全%于远洋%杨波%崔成亮
黃寶良%孔祥錄%劉建全%于遠洋%楊波%崔成亮
황보량%공상록%류건전%우원양%양파%최성량
膝关节镜%胫骨平台骨折%微创%切开复位
膝關節鏡%脛骨平檯骨摺%微創%切開複位
슬관절경%경골평태골절%미창%절개복위
Knee Arthroscopy%Tibial Plateau Fracture%Minimal Invasion%Open Reduction
目的:通过比较关节镜结合锁定加压钢板(LCP)内固定与切开复位内固定治疗SchatzkerⅡ、Ⅲ型胫骨平台骨折,回顾性评价关节镜结合LCP内固定治疗的临床效果。方法2008年9月~2011年12月对65例SchatzkerⅡ、Ⅲ型胫骨平台骨折患者资料回顾性分析,根据治疗方法不同随机分为两组,其中35例采用关节镜结合LCP内固定(A组),30例采用小切口切开复位内固定治疗(B组)。对两组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、术后引流量、下地负重时间、骨折愈合时间、术后并发症及膝关节功能优良率等进行比较分析。结果两组患者均获得随访,随访时间12~26个月,平均16个月,骨折全部愈合,平均愈合时间3.2个月。手术时间、术中出血量、术后引流量、临床愈合时间差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组下地负重时间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。按Rasmussen评分标准评定:A组优22例,良10例,可3例;B组优13例,良8例,可9例,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。并发症为创伤性关节炎:A组3例(8.6%),B组9例(30%);膝关节僵硬:A组0例,B组3例(10%)两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论关节镜结合LCP内固定治疗SchatzkerⅡ、Ⅲ型胫骨平台骨折与切开复位内固定相比,具有术后功能恢复快、并发症少等优点,有较高的实用性和安全性。
目的:通過比較關節鏡結閤鎖定加壓鋼闆(LCP)內固定與切開複位內固定治療SchatzkerⅡ、Ⅲ型脛骨平檯骨摺,迴顧性評價關節鏡結閤LCP內固定治療的臨床效果。方法2008年9月~2011年12月對65例SchatzkerⅡ、Ⅲ型脛骨平檯骨摺患者資料迴顧性分析,根據治療方法不同隨機分為兩組,其中35例採用關節鏡結閤LCP內固定(A組),30例採用小切口切開複位內固定治療(B組)。對兩組患者的手術時間、術中齣血量、術後引流量、下地負重時間、骨摺愈閤時間、術後併髮癥及膝關節功能優良率等進行比較分析。結果兩組患者均穫得隨訪,隨訪時間12~26箇月,平均16箇月,骨摺全部愈閤,平均愈閤時間3.2箇月。手術時間、術中齣血量、術後引流量、臨床愈閤時間差異均有統計學意義(P<0.05)。兩組下地負重時間比較差異無統計學意義(P>0.05)。按Rasmussen評分標準評定:A組優22例,良10例,可3例;B組優13例,良8例,可9例,兩組比較差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。併髮癥為創傷性關節炎:A組3例(8.6%),B組9例(30%);膝關節僵硬:A組0例,B組3例(10%)兩組比較差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論關節鏡結閤LCP內固定治療SchatzkerⅡ、Ⅲ型脛骨平檯骨摺與切開複位內固定相比,具有術後功能恢複快、併髮癥少等優點,有較高的實用性和安全性。
목적:통과비교관절경결합쇄정가압강판(LCP)내고정여절개복위내고정치료SchatzkerⅡ、Ⅲ형경골평태골절,회고성평개관절경결합LCP내고정치료적림상효과。방법2008년9월~2011년12월대65례SchatzkerⅡ、Ⅲ형경골평태골절환자자료회고성분석,근거치료방법불동수궤분위량조,기중35례채용관절경결합LCP내고정(A조),30례채용소절구절개복위내고정치료(B조)。대량조환자적수술시간、술중출혈량、술후인류량、하지부중시간、골절유합시간、술후병발증급슬관절공능우량솔등진행비교분석。결과량조환자균획득수방,수방시간12~26개월,평균16개월,골절전부유합,평균유합시간3.2개월。수술시간、술중출혈량、술후인류량、림상유합시간차이균유통계학의의(P<0.05)。량조하지부중시간비교차이무통계학의의(P>0.05)。안Rasmussen평분표준평정:A조우22례,량10례,가3례;B조우13례,량8례,가9례,량조비교차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。병발증위창상성관절염:A조3례(8.6%),B조9례(30%);슬관절강경:A조0례,B조3례(10%)량조비교차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론관절경결합LCP내고정치료SchatzkerⅡ、Ⅲ형경골평태골절여절개복위내고정상비,구유술후공능회복쾌、병발증소등우점,유교고적실용성화안전성。
Objective To retrospectively analyze the results of treatment with arthroscopy combined with Locking compress plate (LCP) for Schatzker Ⅱ and Ⅲ tibial plateau fracture in comparison with open reduction and internal fixation.Methods In Sep 2008 to Dec 2011,65 patients with tibial plateau fractures of Schatzker types II and III were treated with arthroscopy combined with Locking compress plate (LCP) (group A 35 cases),and with open reduction and internal fixation (group B 30 cases).The clinical outcomes were compared between the 2 methods,including operation time,the volume of blood loss,postoperative drainage volume,Down load time,fracture healing time,postoperative complications and the excellent and good rate of knee function.Results All cases were followed-up (mean 16 months,range 12~26 months).All fractures healed.Fracture healing time was 10~12 weeks in group A,11~12 weeks in group B(P<0.05).Operation time,the volume of blood loss、postoperative drainage volume and fracture healing time,difference have statisticall significant(P<0.05).Two groups there was no statistically significant difference compared to down load time(P>0.05).By Rasmussen scoring system,in group A find 22 excellent cases,10 good ones,3 fair ones,and in group B find 13 excellent cases,8 good ones,9 fair ones,(P<0.05).After operation,3 cases of traumatic arthritis occurred in group A(8.6%)and 9 cases ccurred in group B(30%).3 cases of anchylosises ccurred in group B(10%) and 0 casesin group A(P<0.05). Conclusion The Arthroscopy combined with LCP internal fixation is better than open reduction and internal fixation in the treatment of tibial plateau fractures of Schatzker types II and III,because it has advantages of rapid recovery,fewer complications.It has higher practicability and safety.