北京科技大学学报
北京科技大學學報
북경과기대학학보
JOURNAL OF UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY BEIJING
2014年
2期
241-245
,共5页
板材%厚度控制%轧制%前滑%数学模型%有限元法
闆材%厚度控製%軋製%前滑%數學模型%有限元法
판재%후도공제%알제%전활%수학모형%유한원법
sheet metal%thickness control%rolling%forward slip%mathematical models%finite element method
根据变厚度轧制特点和前滑定义,推导了一种变厚度轧制的前滑值的理论模型.用MARC软件建立变厚度轧制的有限元模型,针对四种不同变厚度区形状的轧件在轧制摩擦因数为0.08和0.1工况条件下的轧制过程进行了数值模拟.此外,采用轧制试验方法实测了总前滑量.对比分析结果表明:前滑理论模型的计算值与有限元数值模拟结果接近,两种方法计算所得前滑值的差值小于0.005.与常规恒厚度轧制中稳定前滑值不同,在变厚度区轧制时,前滑值在0.02~0.10波动.变厚度区的压下率越大,其前滑值也越大;较小变厚度区斜度设计和低的摩擦因数会使变厚度轧制有更好的轧制稳定性和小的前滑波动范围. TRB变厚度轧制试验也验证了前滑理论模型的精度.减薄轧制实测前滑值和计算值偏差大与变形区应变状态及增加的打滑趋势有关.
根據變厚度軋製特點和前滑定義,推導瞭一種變厚度軋製的前滑值的理論模型.用MARC軟件建立變厚度軋製的有限元模型,針對四種不同變厚度區形狀的軋件在軋製摩抆因數為0.08和0.1工況條件下的軋製過程進行瞭數值模擬.此外,採用軋製試驗方法實測瞭總前滑量.對比分析結果錶明:前滑理論模型的計算值與有限元數值模擬結果接近,兩種方法計算所得前滑值的差值小于0.005.與常規恆厚度軋製中穩定前滑值不同,在變厚度區軋製時,前滑值在0.02~0.10波動.變厚度區的壓下率越大,其前滑值也越大;較小變厚度區斜度設計和低的摩抆因數會使變厚度軋製有更好的軋製穩定性和小的前滑波動範圍. TRB變厚度軋製試驗也驗證瞭前滑理論模型的精度.減薄軋製實測前滑值和計算值偏差大與變形區應變狀態及增加的打滑趨勢有關.
근거변후도알제특점화전활정의,추도료일충변후도알제적전활치적이론모형.용MARC연건건립변후도알제적유한원모형,침대사충불동변후도구형상적알건재알제마찰인수위0.08화0.1공황조건하적알제과정진행료수치모의.차외,채용알제시험방법실측료총전활량.대비분석결과표명:전활이론모형적계산치여유한원수치모의결과접근,량충방법계산소득전활치적차치소우0.005.여상규항후도알제중은정전활치불동,재변후도구알제시,전활치재0.02~0.10파동.변후도구적압하솔월대,기전활치야월대;교소변후도구사도설계화저적마찰인수회사변후도알제유경호적알제은정성화소적전활파동범위. TRB변후도알제시험야험증료전활이론모형적정도.감박알제실측전활치화계산치편차대여변형구응변상태급증가적타활추세유관.
Based on the characteristic of variable gauge rolling and the definition of forward slip, a forward slip theoretical model was proposed in this article. A finite element model was also established with MARC software. The rolling processes of four different variable gauge strips were numerically simulated at the rolling friction coefficient of 0.08 and 0.1. In addition, the total amount of for-ward slip was measured by an experimental rolling approach. After comparison and analysis, it is found that there is little difference be-tween the value calculated by theoretical forward slip model and the one simulated by finite element method. The difference is less than 0.005. Differing from stable forward slip in tradition constant thickness rolling, the forward slip fluctuates from 0.02 to 0.10 in the variable gauge rolling process. The increase of reduction rate in the variable gauge zone leads to a higher forward slip. A smaller slope of the variable gauge zone and the low friction coefficient result in a better rolling stability and a smaller fluctuation of forward slip. The experiment of TRB rolling also verifies the accuracy of the theoretical forward slip model for variable gauge rolling. The large tolerance between the measured value and the calculated one in thinning rolling is probably caused by the strain condition of deformation area and the increasing slip tendency.