中国医学创新
中國醫學創新
중국의학창신
MEDICAL INNOVATION OF CHINA
2014年
13期
76-78
,共3页
糖尿病性骨质疏松%中西医治疗%骨密度%临床疗效
糖尿病性骨質疏鬆%中西醫治療%骨密度%臨床療效
당뇨병성골질소송%중서의치료%골밀도%림상료효
Diabetic osteoporosis%Chinese and western medicine treatment%Bone mineral density%Clinical curative effect
目的：探讨糖尿病性骨质疏松的中西医治疗价值。方法：选取2011年10月-2013年12月到本院就诊的糖尿病性骨质疏松患者70例，将患者按随机数字表法分为两组，每组35例，其中对照组患者应用阿仑膦酸钠治疗，观察组患者在此基础上加用糖脉康进行治疗，分析和比较两组患者治疗后的临床治疗情况。结果：连续治疗6个月后，观察组的骨密度值为（0.841±0.017）g/cm2，与治疗前的（0.731±0.028）g/cm2及对照组的（0.768±0.011）g/cm2比较，差异均有统计学意义（P<0.05）；同时，在临床疗效方面，观察组显效21例，有效13例，总有效率为97.14%，明显优于对照组的77.14%，差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论：对糖尿病性骨质疏松患者进行中西医综合治疗，能够有效提高临床治疗水平，对患者的骨密度状况加以改善，并且安全、可靠，临床应用价值相对较高，值得进一步推广。
目的：探討糖尿病性骨質疏鬆的中西醫治療價值。方法：選取2011年10月-2013年12月到本院就診的糖尿病性骨質疏鬆患者70例，將患者按隨機數字錶法分為兩組，每組35例，其中對照組患者應用阿崙膦痠鈉治療，觀察組患者在此基礎上加用糖脈康進行治療，分析和比較兩組患者治療後的臨床治療情況。結果：連續治療6箇月後，觀察組的骨密度值為（0.841±0.017）g/cm2，與治療前的（0.731±0.028）g/cm2及對照組的（0.768±0.011）g/cm2比較，差異均有統計學意義（P<0.05）；同時，在臨床療效方麵，觀察組顯效21例，有效13例，總有效率為97.14%，明顯優于對照組的77.14%，差異有統計學意義（P<0.05）。結論：對糖尿病性骨質疏鬆患者進行中西醫綜閤治療，能夠有效提高臨床治療水平，對患者的骨密度狀況加以改善，併且安全、可靠，臨床應用價值相對較高，值得進一步推廣。
목적：탐토당뇨병성골질소송적중서의치료개치。방법：선취2011년10월-2013년12월도본원취진적당뇨병성골질소송환자70례，장환자안수궤수자표법분위량조，매조35례，기중대조조환자응용아륜련산납치료，관찰조환자재차기출상가용당맥강진행치료，분석화비교량조환자치료후적림상치료정황。결과：련속치료6개월후，관찰조적골밀도치위（0.841±0.017）g/cm2，여치료전적（0.731±0.028）g/cm2급대조조적（0.768±0.011）g/cm2비교，차이균유통계학의의（P<0.05）；동시，재림상료효방면，관찰조현효21례，유효13례，총유효솔위97.14%，명현우우대조조적77.14%，차이유통계학의의（P<0.05）。결론：대당뇨병성골질소송환자진행중서의종합치료，능구유효제고림상치료수평，대환자적골밀도상황가이개선，병차안전、가고，림상응용개치상대교고，치득진일보추엄。
Objective: To study the Chinese and western medicine treatment of diabetic osteoporosis, for hospitals to improve the treatment level of diabetic osteoporosis to provide relevant reference.Method: 70 cases of diabetic osteoporosis patients were selected in our hospital from October 2011 to December 2013, the patients were divided into two groups according to random number table method, each group had 35 cases, the control group was used Allen phosphonic acid sodium treatment, and on this basis, the observation group was given sugar pulse treatment. After treatment, the clinical treatment of two groups were analyzed and compared.Result: After treatment for 6 months, the bone mineral density value of the observation group was (0.841±0.017)g/cm2, and compared with(0.731±0.028)g/cm2 before treatment and the control group’s (0.768±0.011)g/cm2, the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). At the same time, in the aspect of clinical curative effect, 21 cases were markedly effective, 13 cases were effective in the observation group, the total effective rate was 97.14%, obviously better than the control group of 77.14%, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).Conclusion: Integrated traditional Chinese and western medicine therapy in patients with diabetic osteoporosis, can effectively improve the level of clinical treatment, the patients with bone mineral density situation improved, and the safe, reliable, relatively high clinical value, worthy of further promotion.
