CAJ | 학술논문

目的：通过比较微创拔牙法与传统拔牙法拔除下颌阻生智齿的临床应用效果，寻找更合理的阻生齿的拔除方案。方法：选择临床需要拔除下颌各种阻生齿的患者180例，按随机数字表法分为试验组和对照组，每组90例，分别采用高速涡轮机结合微创拔牙刀和传统拔牙器械拔除患牙。比较两组拔牙过程中畏惧发生率及术后张口度、疼痛、拔牙窝完整性等的差异。结果：试验组的牙科畏惧症发生率明显低于对照组，手术效果明显优于传统组，差异均具有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论：微创拔牙法拔除下颌阻生齿可达到无痛、安全、微创的目的，更适合临床推广应用。
목적：통과비교미창발아법여전통발아법발제하합조생지치적림상응용효과，심조경합리적조생치적발제방안。방법：선택림상수요발제하합각충조생치적환자180례，안수궤수자표법분위시험조화대조조，매조90례，분별채용고속와륜궤결합미창발아도화전통발아기계발제환아。비교량조발아과정중외구발생솔급술후장구도、동통、발아와완정성등적차이。결과：시험조적아과외구증발생솔명현저우대조조，수술효과명현우우전통조，차이균구유통계학의의（P<0.05）。결론：미창발아법발제하합조생치가체도무통、안전、미창적목적，경괄합림상추엄응용。
Objective:To compare the clinical application effect of minimally invasive extraction and traditional extraction method of extraction of impacted mandibular third molars extraction of impacted,for more reasonable. Method:180 cases of all kinds of mandibular impacted teeth needed to be extracted were chosen,they were randomly divided into experimental group and control group,90 cases in each group,respectively,used high speed turbine combined with minimally invasive extraction and traditional extraction instrument knife teeth extracted,the difference of mouth opening, pain,tooth nest integrity and incidence of fear between the two groups were compared. Result:The experimental group groups with dental fear was significantly lower than that of the control group,operation effect was better than the traditional group, the difference was statistically significant between two groups(P<0.05). Conclusion:Minimally invasive extraction method of extracting impacted mandibular third molars can achieve painless,safe,minimally invasive,is more suitable for clinical application.