CAJ | 학술논문

以我国2005-2012年颁布的48份知识产权服务相关政策为样本，用内容分析法，对相关政策按政策级别、政策所作用的层面以及政策的功能属性建立了分析维度。分析了知识产权服务的政策所存在的问题，表现在政策效力等级整体上与作用层面不相适应；知识产权服务针对性政策数量不足，缺乏可操作性；专利政策与国家经济科技政策的衔接不够紧密。分析了知识产权服务政策制定所出现的良性态势，表现在战略性新兴产业知识产权服务政策日益受重视；科技政策与产业政策协同发展；企业知识产权服务政策向体系化和结构合理化迈进。并提出了政策制定的建议，发挥政府的主导作用，力避政策结构失衡；提高各省市的具体政策措施数量和质量；提高人才政策制定的指向性和针对性。
이아국2005-2012년반포적48빈지식산권복무상관정책위양본，용내용분석법，대상관정책안정책급별、정책소작용적층면이급정책적공능속성건립료분석유도。분석료지식산권복무적정책소존재적문제，표현재정책효력등급정체상여작용층면불상괄응；지식산권복무침대성정책수량불족，결핍가조작성；전리정책여국가경제과기정책적함접불구긴밀。분석료지식산권복무정책제정소출현적량성태세，표현재전략성신흥산업지식산권복무정책일익수중시；과기정책여산업정책협동발전；기업지식산권복무정책향체계화화결구합이화매진。병제출료정책제정적건의，발휘정부적주도작용，력피정책결구실형；제고각성시적구체정책조시수량화질량；제고인재정책제정적지향성화침대성。
Taking 48 policies of IP services issued between 2005-2012 as a sample in China, using content analysis, the authority has established the analyzing dimension according to the policies of relevant levels , the contributing roles and the func-tional attributes. The existing problems of policies in IP services are shown below: the incompatibility between the overall and operational level for the policy effectiveness, the insufficiency of targeted IP services policies and the lack of operability, the loose link between the patent policy and national policy of economy and S&T. While , the positive trend of policy-making for IP services policies is in progressing, such as the increasing attention by the government about the importance of IP services policies in stra-tegic emerging industries, the synergy of S&T policy and industrial policy, the systematization and structural rationalization of IP services policies. Some suggestions for policymaking are provided , such as playing leading role of government and avoiding policy configuration imbalance, improving the quantity and quality of the specific policy measures in every province, enhancing the ori-entation and pertinence of HR policies.