开放教育研究
開放教育研究
개방교육연구
OPEN EDUCATION RESEARCH
2014年
3期
44-52
,共9页
袁莉%斯蒂芬·鲍威尔%比尔·奥利弗%马红亮(译)
袁莉%斯蒂芬·鮑威爾%比爾·奧利弗%馬紅亮(譯)
원리%사체분·포위이%비이·오리불%마홍량(역)
大规模开放在线课程(MOOC)%在线学习%技术支持%教学方法%商业模式
大規模開放在線課程(MOOC)%在線學習%技術支持%教學方法%商業模式
대규모개방재선과정(MOOC)%재선학습%기술지지%교학방법%상업모식
MOOCs%online learning%technology approach%pedagogy%business model
当前,MOOC在全球范围的迅猛发展为高校的教学和在线教育带来了新的挑战和契机。这包括如何改进现有的课堂教学实践,提高高校的声誉和发展运作模式。其中,关键的一点是高校如何利用MOOC的一些概念、原理和方法来提高传统教育和在线教育的质量,特别是在深入认识和理解MOOC的基础上,制定新的教育战略,全面发挥数字技术的优势,探索新的商业模式和教学方法。本文从三个方面对今后高校在线教育的发展进行了深入剖析:1)MOOC催生了在线教学的三个新特征:开放性、营利模式和服务分离;2)高校应从技术选择、教学法创新和学习者需求三个角度探索MOOC等在线教学的发展;3)高校应该积极应对挑战和机遇,调整战略,探索新的商业模式,以促进在线教育的可持续发展。
噹前,MOOC在全毬範圍的迅猛髮展為高校的教學和在線教育帶來瞭新的挑戰和契機。這包括如何改進現有的課堂教學實踐,提高高校的聲譽和髮展運作模式。其中,關鍵的一點是高校如何利用MOOC的一些概唸、原理和方法來提高傳統教育和在線教育的質量,特彆是在深入認識和理解MOOC的基礎上,製定新的教育戰略,全麵髮揮數字技術的優勢,探索新的商業模式和教學方法。本文從三箇方麵對今後高校在線教育的髮展進行瞭深入剖析:1)MOOC催生瞭在線教學的三箇新特徵:開放性、營利模式和服務分離;2)高校應從技術選擇、教學法創新和學習者需求三箇角度探索MOOC等在線教學的髮展;3)高校應該積極應對挑戰和機遇,調整戰略,探索新的商業模式,以促進在線教育的可持續髮展。
당전,MOOC재전구범위적신맹발전위고교적교학화재선교육대래료신적도전화계궤。저포괄여하개진현유적과당교학실천,제고고교적성예화발전운작모식。기중,관건적일점시고교여하이용MOOC적일사개념、원리화방법래제고전통교육화재선교육적질량,특별시재심입인식화리해MOOC적기출상,제정신적교육전략,전면발휘수자기술적우세,탐색신적상업모식화교학방법。본문종삼개방면대금후고교재선교육적발전진행료심입부석:1)MOOC최생료재선교학적삼개신특정:개방성、영리모식화복무분리;2)고교응종기술선택、교학법창신화학습자수구삼개각도탐색MOOC등재선교학적발전;3)고교응해적겁응대도전화궤우,조정전략,탐색신적상업모식,이촉진재선교육적가지속발전。
The critical discourse emerging around MOOCs is providing an opportunity for institutions to develop a more strategic approach to online learning. This includes enhancing existing classroom teaching, promoting institu-tional reputation and developing new revenue models. The findings from this report are summarised in three sections:key themes that have emerged from the MOOC experiment, opportunities that institutions should consider exploring, and longer-term strategic considerations and likelihood that this will happen for institutions. <br> Three key themes emerge from the MOOC experiment are: <br> i. Openness-new approaches to online learning, including models for scalable provision that may generate reve-nues, and promote open learning, which goes beyond institutional boundaries through the use of online communities. <br> ii. Revenue models-different revenue models taking the established ideas from technology start-ups, such as ap-plying the concepts of freemium and premium offers into online learning, providing institutions with new ways of think-ing about marketing and income generation. <br> iii. Service disaggregation - experimentation with business models that include unbundling and re-bundling of courses and delivery related services, such as offering paid for assessment and/or teaching and support, on top of free online course content. <br> Institutions should consider exploring a set of opportunities that have been brought to the attention of mainstream education by MOOCs, and experiment with new approaches for developing technology-enabled changes in teaching and learning to improve opportunities for individual learners. These include: <br> i. Technology options - new platforms and services with different functions, terms and conditions for experimen-ting with the development of MOOCs and open online provision in institutions, including opening up an existing VLE, partnering with a commercial MOOC platform;or using an ad hoc collection of tools and services that are suitable for innovative experimentation. <br> ii. Pedagogic opportunities - for educators to experiment and evaluate different online learning approaches by developing and using MOOCs that challenge the established roles of learner and teacher and offer more flexible forms of learning and assessment that include community as well as content-based models of learning. <br> iii. Learner choices - developing new and affordable ways for learners to access courses and materials with the possibility of study for credits that are affordable and flexible. A starting point that is not based on existing courses can be a less constraining way of exploring new approaches. <br> Institutions are operating in an environment of increased marketisation and global competition, increasing student demand, reduced central government funding and affordability issues for students. Institutions will have to make stra-tegic choices about how they respond to the changing contexts in which they operate. Depending on the starting point these will have short, medium and long-term implications: <br> i. Mission, purpose and values -taking full account of the significant wider changes in HEIs' business environ-ments that may require institutions to review how they interpret their mission, purpose and values when developing their strategic response. <br> ii. Strategic directions - using the new opportunities presented by rethinking MOOCs as a useful motivation for institutions to examine their current provision and think about ways in which they can change and diversify. However, failure to recognise the scale of this challenge may well derail any new strategic directions. <br> iii. Capability building requirements - reviewing existing in-house capabilities including: technical infrastruc-ture, academic and support staff working practices. If starting from a low base, these will require significant commit-ment to change and develop, in order to support new business models for online provision. <br> iv. Business model components - there is an opportunity for institutions to examine their current provision and think about ways in which they can develop new sustainable business models for open online provision that take as their starting point the needs of the learner rather than the interests of the institution.