继续医学教育
繼續醫學教育
계속의학교육
CONTINUING MEDICAL EDUCATION
2014年
1期
23-25
,共3页
牛巧丽%努尔比亚木·麦麦提依明%赵今
牛巧麗%努爾比亞木·麥麥提依明%趙今
우교려%노이비아목·맥맥제의명%조금
EDTA凝胶%钙化阻塞根管%根管预备%C型先锋锉%ProTaper镍钛锉
EDTA凝膠%鈣化阻塞根管%根管預備%C型先鋒銼%ProTaper鎳鈦銼
EDTA응효%개화조새근관%근관예비%C형선봉촤%ProTaper얼태촤
EDTA%Calcification obstructed root canal%Root canal preparation%C-Pilot files%ProTaper nickel titanium file
目的:针对临床钙化阻塞根管预备中是否采用EDTA凝胶辅助C型先锋锉和手用ProTaper镍钛锉进行根管预备的临床效果比较,以其提高口腔根管治疗质量。方法制定严格筛选标准,选取根管细小钙化患牙50颗,钙化根管136个,随机分为两组,实验组采用EDTA凝胶辅助C型先锋锉和手用ProTaper镍钛锉预备根管70个;对照组不使用EDTA凝胶,只用C型先锋锉加手用ProTaper镍钛锉预备根管66个,根据X线片和临床指标等检查比较两组根管预备效果。结果实验组70个钙化根管有61个根管扩通,达到根管预备要求,成功率87.14%;对照组66个钙化根管有34个根管扩通,成功率51.52%,对比两者之间有显著差异。结论在临床钙化阻塞根管的机械预备中应用EDTA凝胶辅助,可极大提高钙化阻塞根管的疏通率,提高口腔根管治疗质量,有效保留患牙。
目的:針對臨床鈣化阻塞根管預備中是否採用EDTA凝膠輔助C型先鋒銼和手用ProTaper鎳鈦銼進行根管預備的臨床效果比較,以其提高口腔根管治療質量。方法製定嚴格篩選標準,選取根管細小鈣化患牙50顆,鈣化根管136箇,隨機分為兩組,實驗組採用EDTA凝膠輔助C型先鋒銼和手用ProTaper鎳鈦銼預備根管70箇;對照組不使用EDTA凝膠,隻用C型先鋒銼加手用ProTaper鎳鈦銼預備根管66箇,根據X線片和臨床指標等檢查比較兩組根管預備效果。結果實驗組70箇鈣化根管有61箇根管擴通,達到根管預備要求,成功率87.14%;對照組66箇鈣化根管有34箇根管擴通,成功率51.52%,對比兩者之間有顯著差異。結論在臨床鈣化阻塞根管的機械預備中應用EDTA凝膠輔助,可極大提高鈣化阻塞根管的疏通率,提高口腔根管治療質量,有效保留患牙。
목적:침대림상개화조새근관예비중시부채용EDTA응효보조C형선봉촤화수용ProTaper얼태촤진행근관예비적림상효과비교,이기제고구강근관치료질량。방법제정엄격사선표준,선취근관세소개화환아50과,개화근관136개,수궤분위량조,실험조채용EDTA응효보조C형선봉촤화수용ProTaper얼태촤예비근관70개;대조조불사용EDTA응효,지용C형선봉촤가수용ProTaper얼태촤예비근관66개,근거X선편화림상지표등검사비교량조근관예비효과。결과실험조70개개화근관유61개근관확통,체도근관예비요구,성공솔87.14%;대조조66개개화근관유34개근관확통,성공솔51.52%,대비량자지간유현저차이。결론재림상개화조새근관적궤계예비중응용EDTA응효보조,가겁대제고개화조새근관적소통솔,제고구강근관치료질량,유효보류환아。
Objective To compare clinical effect of root canal preparation by ProTaper nickel titanium and EDTA gel preparation, to improve the quality of root canal therapy. Methods The strict screening criteria, selection of fine root canal calcification 50 teeth, calcified root canal 136, were randomly divided into two groups, the experimental group with EDTA gel assisted C pioneer file and hand ProTaper nickel titanium file in root canal preparation70;control group without the use of EDTA gel, only C pioneer file hand ProTaper nickel titanium file in root canal preparation 66, according to the X-ray and clinical examination were compared between the two groups of root canal preparation effect. Results 70 calcified root canals of 61 root canal expansion, to prepare for the root canal, the success rate was 87.14%;the control group 66 calcified root canals of 34 root canal expansion, the success rate was 51.52%, there was a significant difference between the two comparison. Conclusion The application of EDTA gel root canal blocking auxiliary mechanical preparation in clinical calcification, can greatly improve the calcified root canal occlusion of the dredging rate, improve the quality of root canal therapy, the effective teeth.