组织工程与重建外科杂志
組織工程與重建外科雜誌
조직공정여중건외과잡지
JOURNAL OF TISSUE ENGINEERING AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY
2014年
1期
49-50
,共2页
刘春军%吉恺%孙晶晶%栾杰
劉春軍%吉愷%孫晶晶%欒傑
류춘군%길개%손정정%란걸
三维扫描%乳房体积%隆乳术
三維掃描%乳房體積%隆乳術
삼유소묘%유방체적%륭유술
Three-dimensional scanning%Breast volume%Augmentation mammaplasty
目的:通过三维扫描技术,检测呼吸状态对乳房整形术后体积变化的影响。方法自2010年1月至2010年12月,随机选取20例假体隆乳术后患者作为研究对象,在不同呼吸状态下接受3次乳房三维扫描:自然呼气末(Scan 1)、自然吸气末(Scan 2)和自然呼气末(Scan 3)。使用计算机软件测量Scan 1和Scan 3之间(R1)、Scan 1和Scan 2之间(R2)的乳房体积变化和三维偏差,并检测乳房体积变化与三维偏差的相关系数。结果本组术后乳房平均体积为(354.1±53.9) mL;R1的乳房体积变化和三维偏差均明显小于R2(9.9 mL VS 22.7 mL,P<0.05;0.9 mm VS 1.7 mm,P<0.05);R1的乳房体积变化与三维偏差无明显相关(P>0.05),但是R2的乳房体积变化与三维偏差明显正相关,相关系数为0.766(P<0.05)。结论保持乳房三维扫描时呼吸状态的一致性,对于准确测量乳房体积变化具有重要意义。
目的:通過三維掃描技術,檢測呼吸狀態對乳房整形術後體積變化的影響。方法自2010年1月至2010年12月,隨機選取20例假體隆乳術後患者作為研究對象,在不同呼吸狀態下接受3次乳房三維掃描:自然呼氣末(Scan 1)、自然吸氣末(Scan 2)和自然呼氣末(Scan 3)。使用計算機軟件測量Scan 1和Scan 3之間(R1)、Scan 1和Scan 2之間(R2)的乳房體積變化和三維偏差,併檢測乳房體積變化與三維偏差的相關繫數。結果本組術後乳房平均體積為(354.1±53.9) mL;R1的乳房體積變化和三維偏差均明顯小于R2(9.9 mL VS 22.7 mL,P<0.05;0.9 mm VS 1.7 mm,P<0.05);R1的乳房體積變化與三維偏差無明顯相關(P>0.05),但是R2的乳房體積變化與三維偏差明顯正相關,相關繫數為0.766(P<0.05)。結論保持乳房三維掃描時呼吸狀態的一緻性,對于準確測量乳房體積變化具有重要意義。
목적:통과삼유소묘기술,검측호흡상태대유방정형술후체적변화적영향。방법자2010년1월지2010년12월,수궤선취20례가체륭유술후환자작위연구대상,재불동호흡상태하접수3차유방삼유소묘:자연호기말(Scan 1)、자연흡기말(Scan 2)화자연호기말(Scan 3)。사용계산궤연건측량Scan 1화Scan 3지간(R1)、Scan 1화Scan 2지간(R2)적유방체적변화화삼유편차,병검측유방체적변화여삼유편차적상관계수。결과본조술후유방평균체적위(354.1±53.9) mL;R1적유방체적변화화삼유편차균명현소우R2(9.9 mL VS 22.7 mL,P<0.05;0.9 mm VS 1.7 mm,P<0.05);R1적유방체적변화여삼유편차무명현상관(P>0.05),단시R2적유방체적변화여삼유편차명현정상관,상관계수위0.766(P<0.05)。결론보지유방삼유소묘시호흡상태적일치성,대우준학측량유방체적변화구유중요의의。
Objective To investigate the influence of respiration on breast volume after augmentation mammaplasty by 3D scanning. Methods From January 2010 to December 2010, twenty patients after augmentation mammaplasty were received pre-operative 3D scanning in different respiration states respectively: in the end of normal exhalation (Scan 1), in the end of normal inhalation (Scan 2) and in the end of normal exhalation again (Scan 3). By using Geomagic Studio 12 software, breast volumetric change and 3D deviation were measured between Scan1 and Scan 3 (R1), also between Scan 1 and Scan 2 (R2). Pearson's correlation coefficient was calculated between 3D deviation and breast volumetric change. Results The mean breast volume of all the patients was (354.1±53.9) ml. Breast volumetric change and 3D deviation in R1 were both significantly lower than in R2 (9.9 ml VS 22.7 ml, P<0.05; 0.9 ml VS 1.7ml, P<0.05). Breast volumetric change was not correlated with 3D deviation in R1 (P>0.05) while it was correlated with 3D deviation in R2 significantly with the correlation coefficient as 0.766 (P<0.05). Conclusion Keeping patients in the same respiration state is crucial to accurate measurement of breast volume by 3D scanning.