组织工程与重建外科杂志
組織工程與重建外科雜誌
조직공정여중건외과잡지
JOURNAL OF TISSUE ENGINEERING AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY
2014年
1期
14-18,29
,共6页
潘俊君%白隽瑄%张艳宁%龙丽华%周洪
潘俊君%白雋瑄%張豔寧%龍麗華%週洪
반준군%백준선%장염저%룡려화%주홍
颌面测量%三维激光扫描%直接测量法
頜麵測量%三維激光掃描%直接測量法
합면측량%삼유격광소묘%직접측량법
Craniofacial measurement%3D laser scanning%Direct manual measurement
目的:设计基于三维激光扫描技术的颌面三维测量系统,并与直接测量法进行比较。方法通过三维激光扫描仪扫描28例志愿者正面、左侧面和右侧面的3幅图像,对图像进行坏点去除、补洞等前期处理,拼接经过前期处理的3幅图像并生成整体三维模型,利用自行开发的软件3D-FACE VIEWER进行颌面部直线、曲线、角度及比例的测量,并将测量结果与直接测量法得到的结果进行对比。结果三维扫描测量法的结果与直接测量法的结果相差不大。在56项点距测量中,49项测量误差不超过2~3 mm;在17项弧长测量中,7项测量误差不超过2~3 mm。结论基于三维激光扫描技术的颌面三维测量系统是一种良好可行的方法,三维测量系统3D-FACE VIEWER可以较准确地完成颌面的测量,具有一定的临床应用价值。
目的:設計基于三維激光掃描技術的頜麵三維測量繫統,併與直接測量法進行比較。方法通過三維激光掃描儀掃描28例誌願者正麵、左側麵和右側麵的3幅圖像,對圖像進行壞點去除、補洞等前期處理,拼接經過前期處理的3幅圖像併生成整體三維模型,利用自行開髮的軟件3D-FACE VIEWER進行頜麵部直線、麯線、角度及比例的測量,併將測量結果與直接測量法得到的結果進行對比。結果三維掃描測量法的結果與直接測量法的結果相差不大。在56項點距測量中,49項測量誤差不超過2~3 mm;在17項弧長測量中,7項測量誤差不超過2~3 mm。結論基于三維激光掃描技術的頜麵三維測量繫統是一種良好可行的方法,三維測量繫統3D-FACE VIEWER可以較準確地完成頜麵的測量,具有一定的臨床應用價值。
목적:설계기우삼유격광소묘기술적합면삼유측량계통,병여직접측량법진행비교。방법통과삼유격광소묘의소묘28례지원자정면、좌측면화우측면적3폭도상,대도상진행배점거제、보동등전기처리,병접경과전기처리적3폭도상병생성정체삼유모형,이용자행개발적연건3D-FACE VIEWER진행합면부직선、곡선、각도급비례적측량,병장측량결과여직접측량법득도적결과진행대비。결과삼유소묘측량법적결과여직접측량법적결과상차불대。재56항점거측량중,49항측량오차불초과2~3 mm;재17항호장측량중,7항측량오차불초과2~3 mm。결론기우삼유격광소묘기술적합면삼유측량계통시일충량호가행적방법,삼유측량계통3D-FACE VIEWER가이교준학지완성합면적측량,구유일정적림상응용개치。
Objective To design a craniofacial measurement technique based on 3D laser scanning and to verify the system feasibility by comparing with direct manual method. Methods Twenty-eight volunteers were scanned from three directions by 3D laser scanner, including front, left side and right side. After generating these three 3D face images, the preprocessing was conducted, such as the removal of dead pixels and filling of the holes. Then these three images were merged to build a completed 3D face model. Then the Euclidean distance, geodesic distance, angles and ratios of all the items were measured by 3D measurement software 3D-FACE VIEWER developed by ourself. And the results were compared with direct manual measurements. Results The statistical difference between direct manual measurement and 3D measurement was not obvious. The error of 49 items among 56 Euclidean distance measurements and 7 items among 17 geodesic distance measurements were less than 2~3 mm. Conclusion The craniofacial measurement by 3D laser scanning is effective. The software 3D-FACE VIEWER is ideal for craniofacial measurement and worth of promotion.