CAJ | 학술논문

目的：探讨高职生主观幸福感与一般自我效能感以及应对方式的关系，了解其心理健康状况，为高校心理咨询提供参考。方法运用总体幸福感量表、一般自我效能量表、应对方式量表对188名高职生进行调查。结果①大专生的主观幸福感处于中等偏上的水平，一般自我效能较高，处于自信心较高水平，其应对方式以积极应对为主；②主观幸福感在性别、城乡、专业上无显著差异；③一般自我效能感在学科和地区方面没有显著性差异，但是在性别和年级方面有显著性差异；④应对方式在性别、城乡、专业上没有显著差异；⑤高职生的主观幸福感与一般自我效能感存在显著正相关，与应对方式存在显著相关，其中，与积极应对方式存在显著正相关，与消极应对方式存在显著负相关；⑥一般自我效能感能解释主观幸福感的比例达19.7%左右，应对方式对主观幸福感的联合预测为22.4%，积极应对方式预测为12.8%，消极应对预测则为9.6%。结论积极应对方式对主观幸福感的预测更有意义。
목적：탐토고직생주관행복감여일반자아효능감이급응대방식적관계，료해기심리건강상황，위고교심리자순제공삼고。방법운용총체행복감량표、일반자아효능량표、응대방식량표대188명고직생진행조사。결과①대전생적주관행복감처우중등편상적수평，일반자아효능교고，처우자신심교고수평，기응대방식이적겁응대위주；②주관행복감재성별、성향、전업상무현저차이；③일반자아효능감재학과화지구방면몰유현저성차이，단시재성별화년급방면유현저성차이；④응대방식재성별、성향、전업상몰유현저차이；⑤고직생적주관행복감여일반자아효능감존재현저정상관，여응대방식존재현저상관，기중，여적겁응대방식존재현저정상관，여소겁응대방식존재현저부상관；⑥일반자아효능감능해석주관행복감적비례체19.7%좌우，응대방식대주관행복감적연합예측위22.4%，적겁응대방식예측위12.8%，소겁응대예측칙위9.6%。결론적겁응대방식대주관행복감적예측경유의의。
Objective:To explore the relationship between subjective well-being and general self-efficacy of Higher Vocational Students, and its coping styles, so as to provide the reference basis for the psychological consultation in colleges and universities. Methods: Using general well-being scale, general self efficacy scale, coping scale to experiment on 188 students in Shantou Polytechnic . Results: the college students' subjective well-being were in the mid to upper level, there general self-efficacy and self-confidence were in higher level, they should be given priority to positive coping; the subjective well-being had no significant difference in gender, professional, urban and rural; the general self-efficacy had no significant difference in the discipline and area, but there were significant differences in two aspects of gender and grade; there were no significant differences in sex, urban and rural, profession, coping style and subjective well-being had significantly positive correlation with general self-efficacy, it was significantly correlated with coping style and positive coping style revealed significant positive correlation while negative coping style revealed significant negative correlation; the general self-efficacy which can explained subjective well-being was about 19.7%, coping style on the combined forecast subjective well-being was 22.4%, positive coping style and forecast of 12.8%, while negative coping predicted 9.6%. Conclusion:positive coping style predict more sense of subjective well-being.