中华医学教育探索杂志
中華醫學教育探索雜誌
중화의학교육탐색잡지
Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research
2014年
1期
94-96
,共3页
杜权%张亚梅%但伶%刘祺%徐昆
杜權%張亞梅%但伶%劉祺%徐昆
두권%장아매%단령%류기%서곤
以问题为基础的学习%示教%麻醉学
以問題為基礎的學習%示教%痳醉學
이문제위기출적학습%시교%마취학
Problem-based learning%Clinical demonstration%Anesthesiology
目的:探讨以问题为基础的学习(problem-based learning,PBL)在临床医学本科专业麻醉学示教课中的应用效果。方法将2009级临床医学本科两个班分别分为实验组(45人)与对照组(44人),结合教学视频播放、教具演示,在示教课中分别采用PBL和传统教学,通过随堂临床病例考核及问卷调查来观察教学效果。对两组学生问题回答正确率及问卷调查结果行字2检验。结果实验组学生的病例考核完全正确率(42/45)高于对照组(30/44),P<0.05。实验组学生86.7%(39/45)认为提高了自学能力,73.3%(33/45)认为培养了临床思维能力,75.6%(34/45)认为培养了查阅资料获取信息能力,82.2%(37/45)认为培养了语言表达能力,75.6%(34/45)认为PBL还有利于促进同学间的交流、沟通;同对照组比较,P <0.05。结论在临床医学本科专业麻醉学示教课中,PBL具有明显优势,可以增强学生对麻醉学的学习积极性,促进各种能力培养,最终提高教学质量。
目的:探討以問題為基礎的學習(problem-based learning,PBL)在臨床醫學本科專業痳醉學示教課中的應用效果。方法將2009級臨床醫學本科兩箇班分彆分為實驗組(45人)與對照組(44人),結閤教學視頻播放、教具縯示,在示教課中分彆採用PBL和傳統教學,通過隨堂臨床病例攷覈及問捲調查來觀察教學效果。對兩組學生問題迴答正確率及問捲調查結果行字2檢驗。結果實驗組學生的病例攷覈完全正確率(42/45)高于對照組(30/44),P<0.05。實驗組學生86.7%(39/45)認為提高瞭自學能力,73.3%(33/45)認為培養瞭臨床思維能力,75.6%(34/45)認為培養瞭查閱資料穫取信息能力,82.2%(37/45)認為培養瞭語言錶達能力,75.6%(34/45)認為PBL還有利于促進同學間的交流、溝通;同對照組比較,P <0.05。結論在臨床醫學本科專業痳醉學示教課中,PBL具有明顯優勢,可以增彊學生對痳醉學的學習積極性,促進各種能力培養,最終提高教學質量。
목적:탐토이문제위기출적학습(problem-based learning,PBL)재림상의학본과전업마취학시교과중적응용효과。방법장2009급림상의학본과량개반분별분위실험조(45인)여대조조(44인),결합교학시빈파방、교구연시,재시교과중분별채용PBL화전통교학,통과수당림상병례고핵급문권조사래관찰교학효과。대량조학생문제회답정학솔급문권조사결과행자2검험。결과실험조학생적병례고핵완전정학솔(42/45)고우대조조(30/44),P<0.05。실험조학생86.7%(39/45)인위제고료자학능력,73.3%(33/45)인위배양료림상사유능력,75.6%(34/45)인위배양료사열자료획취신식능력,82.2%(37/45)인위배양료어언표체능력,75.6%(34/45)인위PBL환유리우촉진동학간적교류、구통;동대조조비교,P <0.05。결론재림상의학본과전업마취학시교과중,PBL구유명현우세,가이증강학생대마취학적학습적겁성,촉진각충능력배양,최종제고교학질량。
Objective To explore the effect of applying problem-based learning(PBL)in clin-ical anesthesiology demonstration for clinical undergraduates. Methods Eighty-nine 2009 clinical undergraduates were divided into two groups:experimental group and control group. Students in ex-perimental group received PBL while those in control group received traditional teaching. The effect was evaluated according to the results of case examination and investigation table. The results were analyzed by X2 test. Results Most students (42/45) answered questions correctly in experimental group while only 30 of 44 students(30/44)did in control group(P<0.05). Concerning the results of investigation,PBL had more advantages than traditional teaching method in the following 5 aspects:self-studying ability(86.7%,39/45),clinical thinking ability(73.3%,33/45),information seeking ability (75.6%,34/45),expressing ability (82.2%,37/45),communicating between students (75.6%, 34/45)(P<0.05). Conclusions PBL has evident advantages in anesthesiology clinical demonstration. It can inspire students,cultivate abilities,enhance critical thinking and finally improve teaching effect.