中华医学教育探索杂志
中華醫學教育探索雜誌
중화의학교육탐색잡지
Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research
2014年
1期
86-89
,共4页
韩琳娜%李一梅%谢波%赵玉玲%龙波%江莲%张绍群%刘北忠
韓琳娜%李一梅%謝波%趙玉玲%龍波%江蓮%張紹群%劉北忠
한림나%리일매%사파%조옥령%룡파%강련%장소군%류북충
全科医学概论%课程教学%小组学习
全科醫學概論%課程教學%小組學習
전과의학개론%과정교학%소조학습
Introduction to general practice%Course%Small group learning
目的:在《全科医学概论》课程中引入小组学习,培养学生主动学习和创新的能力。方法临床医学专业五年制本科2008级甲乙两班学生共221人,分为20个小组(每组11~12人)。教学内容为《全科医学概论》。课前1周将学习任务布置给学生,甲乙两班分别进行大课讨论,以小组代表的综述发言为主。通过观察、访谈、问卷调查和答卷评分等进行学习效果评价;对相关计数资料行字2检验。结果两班学生对小组学习方法的总赞同率为91%,认为有利于培养主动学习和创新能力者分别为88%与73%。但乙班学生对小组学习的具体优点的认可度低于甲班,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论《全科医学概论》课程引入小组学习,有助于培养学生学习主动性与创新能力。
目的:在《全科醫學概論》課程中引入小組學習,培養學生主動學習和創新的能力。方法臨床醫學專業五年製本科2008級甲乙兩班學生共221人,分為20箇小組(每組11~12人)。教學內容為《全科醫學概論》。課前1週將學習任務佈置給學生,甲乙兩班分彆進行大課討論,以小組代錶的綜述髮言為主。通過觀察、訪談、問捲調查和答捲評分等進行學習效果評價;對相關計數資料行字2檢驗。結果兩班學生對小組學習方法的總讚同率為91%,認為有利于培養主動學習和創新能力者分彆為88%與73%。但乙班學生對小組學習的具體優點的認可度低于甲班,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論《全科醫學概論》課程引入小組學習,有助于培養學生學習主動性與創新能力。
목적:재《전과의학개론》과정중인입소조학습,배양학생주동학습화창신적능력。방법림상의학전업오년제본과2008급갑을량반학생공221인,분위20개소조(매조11~12인)。교학내용위《전과의학개론》。과전1주장학습임무포치급학생,갑을량반분별진행대과토론,이소조대표적종술발언위주。통과관찰、방담、문권조사화답권평분등진행학습효과평개;대상관계수자료행자2검험。결과량반학생대소조학습방법적총찬동솔위91%,인위유리우배양주동학습화창신능력자분별위88%여73%。단을반학생대소조학습적구체우점적인가도저우갑반,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론《전과의학개론》과정인입소조학습,유조우배양학생학습주동성여창신능력。
Objective To introduce small group learning in the course of introduction to gen-eral practice to cultivate students' ability of active learning and innovation. Methods Totally 221 students of 2008 grade A and B classes were enrolled as teaching objects and were divided into 20 groups. Introduction to general practice was used as learning materials. One week before the class, teacher gave students learning task and A and B classes carried on class discussion respectively. Re-view speaking was conducted by the representatives of groups. Effectiveness was evaluated through the observation,interview,questionnaire survey and answer scoring points. Results Overall support per-centage to small group learning was 91%. Percentages of students who believed that small group learn-ing was beneficial to cultivating the ability of active learning and innovation were 88% and 73% re-spectively. Conclusions Introducing small group learning in the course of introduction to general practice is effective and conductive to training students' ability to study and innovate.