福建医科大学学报
福建醫科大學學報
복건의과대학학보
JOURNAL OF FUJIAN MEDICAL UNIVERSITY
2014年
4期
253-257
,共5页
林斌%梁甲兴%林立%张玉华%李多
林斌%樑甲興%林立%張玉華%李多
림빈%량갑흥%림립%장옥화%리다
错牙合 ,安氏Ⅲ类%正畸矫正器%骨基质%正畸学 ,矫正%牙测量学
錯牙閤 ,安氏Ⅲ類%正畸矯正器%骨基質%正畸學 ,矯正%牙測量學
착아합 ,안씨Ⅲ류%정기교정기%골기질%정기학 ,교정%아측량학
malocclusion,angle Class Ⅲ%orthodonticappliances%bone matrix%orthodontics,cor-rective%odontometry
目的:评价不同垂直骨面型的青少年骨性Ⅲ类错牙合正畸治疗疗效差异。方法收集青少年骨性Ⅲ类错牙合患者42例,根据不同骨面型分为3组,通过头影测量分析比较各组患者治疗前后骨骼与软组织改变,探讨不同垂直骨面型患者错牙合畸形面部改善疗效的差异。结果3组患者凹陷的软组织侧貌均得到改善。高角患者主要通过下颌骨顺时针旋转、牙合平面逆时针旋转及上前牙唇倾、下前牙舌倾代偿来实现前牙反牙合的解除,而低角患者更多依赖上前牙唇倾及上颌骨的发育来实现。均角患者其面部比例及颌骨关系相对正常,矫治后主要变化为牙齿的相对移动。结论不同垂直骨面型青少年骨性Ⅲ类错牙合正畸疗效不尽相同;高角型患者在选择采取单纯正畸治疗时需更加谨慎。
目的:評價不同垂直骨麵型的青少年骨性Ⅲ類錯牙閤正畸治療療效差異。方法收集青少年骨性Ⅲ類錯牙閤患者42例,根據不同骨麵型分為3組,通過頭影測量分析比較各組患者治療前後骨骼與軟組織改變,探討不同垂直骨麵型患者錯牙閤畸形麵部改善療效的差異。結果3組患者凹陷的軟組織側貌均得到改善。高角患者主要通過下頜骨順時針鏇轉、牙閤平麵逆時針鏇轉及上前牙脣傾、下前牙舌傾代償來實現前牙反牙閤的解除,而低角患者更多依賴上前牙脣傾及上頜骨的髮育來實現。均角患者其麵部比例及頜骨關繫相對正常,矯治後主要變化為牙齒的相對移動。結論不同垂直骨麵型青少年骨性Ⅲ類錯牙閤正畸療效不儘相同;高角型患者在選擇採取單純正畸治療時需更加謹慎。
목적:평개불동수직골면형적청소년골성Ⅲ류착아합정기치료료효차이。방법수집청소년골성Ⅲ류착아합환자42례,근거불동골면형분위3조,통과두영측량분석비교각조환자치료전후골격여연조직개변,탐토불동수직골면형환자착아합기형면부개선료효적차이。결과3조환자요함적연조직측모균득도개선。고각환자주요통과하합골순시침선전、아합평면역시침선전급상전아진경、하전아설경대상래실현전아반아합적해제,이저각환자경다의뢰상전아진경급상합골적발육래실현。균각환자기면부비례급합골관계상대정상,교치후주요변화위아치적상대이동。결론불동수직골면형청소년골성Ⅲ류착아합정기료효불진상동;고각형환자재선택채취단순정기치료시수경가근신。
Objective To evaluate the treatment outcomes among different vertical facial skeletal types in adolescences with skeletal Class Ⅲ malocclusion . Method A total of 42 skeletal Class Ⅲ adoles-cences treated by orthodontic treatment were collected and were divided into three groups according to dif-ferent vertical facial skeletal types . The cephalometric measurements before and after treatment were an-alyzed by indepent-samples t-test when homogeneity of variance . Otherwise ,when heterogeneity of vari-ance ,Satterthwaite t-test was used . Results All of the three groups effectively ameliorated the skeletalⅢ deformity . Patients with high angle corrected the crossbite by clockwise rotation of the mandibles ,an-ticlockwise rotation of the occlusion planes and the teeth compensation ,while low angle patients more de-pended on upper anterior teeth protrusion and the forward growth of the maxillary . The change of the normal angle patients were the teeth relative movement . Conclusion The treatment outcomes were not the same among adolescences with skeletal Class Ⅲ malocclusion by normal orthodontic treatment .