林业调查规划
林業調查規劃
임업조사규화
FOREST INVENTORY AND PLANNING
2014年
1期
111-114
,共4页
针叶纯林%改造模式%生长情况%保山市
針葉純林%改造模式%生長情況%保山市
침협순림%개조모식%생장정황%보산시
pure forest%transformation model%growth status%Baoshan City
在保山市隆阳区国有林场采用25个种源、3种改造模式对以云南松、华山松为主的针叶纯林进行改造,并以不处理模式作为对照。试验结果表明,各保存种源在树高、地径、冠幅生长以及保存率指标上均达到极显著性差异( P<0.01);在16个保存种源中,五角枫的树高、地径、冠幅生长情况最好,但保存率偏低;其次是马蹄荷、长梗润楠、多花含笑、光皮桦,保存情况均优于五角枫。中缅木莲在树高、地径、冠幅的生长以及保存情况上最差;不同改造模式间针叶树的树高生长和胸径生长均达到极显著性差异(P<0.01),带状改造模式效果最好,间伐改造模式次之,直接改造和不处理模式效果最差。
在保山市隆暘區國有林場採用25箇種源、3種改造模式對以雲南鬆、華山鬆為主的針葉純林進行改造,併以不處理模式作為對照。試驗結果錶明,各保存種源在樹高、地徑、冠幅生長以及保存率指標上均達到極顯著性差異( P<0.01);在16箇保存種源中,五角楓的樹高、地徑、冠幅生長情況最好,但保存率偏低;其次是馬蹄荷、長梗潤楠、多花含笑、光皮樺,保存情況均優于五角楓。中緬木蓮在樹高、地徑、冠幅的生長以及保存情況上最差;不同改造模式間針葉樹的樹高生長和胸徑生長均達到極顯著性差異(P<0.01),帶狀改造模式效果最好,間伐改造模式次之,直接改造和不處理模式效果最差。
재보산시륭양구국유림장채용25개충원、3충개조모식대이운남송、화산송위주적침협순림진행개조,병이불처리모식작위대조。시험결과표명,각보존충원재수고、지경、관폭생장이급보존솔지표상균체도겁현저성차이( P<0.01);재16개보존충원중,오각풍적수고、지경、관폭생장정황최호,단보존솔편저;기차시마제하、장경윤남、다화함소、광피화,보존정황균우우오각풍。중면목련재수고、지경、관폭적생장이급보존정황상최차;불동개조모식간침협수적수고생장화흉경생장균체도겁현저성차이(P<0.01),대상개조모식효과최호,간벌개조모식차지,직접개조화불처리모식효과최차。
Transformation test has been conducted in pure forest of Yunnan pine and pinus armandi at Baoshan state-owned forest farm by using 25 kinds of sources , three kinds of transformation mode.The test results compared with control which showed that the difference of preservation provenances in tree height, diameter, crown growth and preservation rate were significant ( P <0.01); in 16 preservation provenance, performance of Acer mono tree was the best in height , ground diameter, crown, but preser-vation rate was low;followed by horseshoe Netherlands , long-stemmed Machilus, floribunda, luminifera, but save rate were better than Acer mono.The performance of Magnolia tree in height , diameter , crown growth and the preservation rate were the worst;Under different transformation modes , the differences of conifer tree in height and diameter growth were highly significant (P <0.01), the effects of ribbon trans-formation mode was the best , followed by thinning transformation model , the direct transformation mode and non-processing model were the worst.