中医临床研究
中醫臨床研究
중의림상연구
CLINICAL JOURNAL OF CHINESE MEDICINE
2014年
13期
129-130
,共2页
静吸复合麻醉%联合硬膜外阻滞%上腹手术
靜吸複閤痳醉%聯閤硬膜外阻滯%上腹手術
정흡복합마취%연합경막외조체%상복수술
In halation anesthesia%Combined epidural block%Upper abdominal surgery
目的:探讨静吸复合全麻联合硬膜外阻滞与单用静吸复合麻醉用于上腹部手术的优缺点。方法:选择我院2010年1月-2013年1月上腹部手术患者100例为研究对象,随机分为实验组(50例)和对照组(50例),分别采用静吸复合全麻联合硬膜外阻滞与单用静吸复合麻醉,比较分析两组麻醉效果、术后苏醒时间、术后镇痛等情况。结果:实验组麻醉效果优级48例,占96%,无1例差级,麻醉效果显著优于对照组(P<0.05);实验组术后苏醒时间最短8min,最长36min,平均(24.61±10.12)min,明显优于对照组(P<0.05);实验组术后出现疼痛感时间平均为(9.20±1.1)h,较对照组显著延长(P<0.01)。结论:静吸复合全麻联合应用硬膜外阻滞麻醉具有麻醉止痛效果完全,血流动力学平稳,手术复合用药量减少、麻醉、手术安全性高等优点。
目的:探討靜吸複閤全痳聯閤硬膜外阻滯與單用靜吸複閤痳醉用于上腹部手術的優缺點。方法:選擇我院2010年1月-2013年1月上腹部手術患者100例為研究對象,隨機分為實驗組(50例)和對照組(50例),分彆採用靜吸複閤全痳聯閤硬膜外阻滯與單用靜吸複閤痳醉,比較分析兩組痳醉效果、術後囌醒時間、術後鎮痛等情況。結果:實驗組痳醉效果優級48例,佔96%,無1例差級,痳醉效果顯著優于對照組(P<0.05);實驗組術後囌醒時間最短8min,最長36min,平均(24.61±10.12)min,明顯優于對照組(P<0.05);實驗組術後齣現疼痛感時間平均為(9.20±1.1)h,較對照組顯著延長(P<0.01)。結論:靜吸複閤全痳聯閤應用硬膜外阻滯痳醉具有痳醉止痛效果完全,血流動力學平穩,手術複閤用藥量減少、痳醉、手術安全性高等優點。
목적:탐토정흡복합전마연합경막외조체여단용정흡복합마취용우상복부수술적우결점。방법:선택아원2010년1월-2013년1월상복부수술환자100례위연구대상,수궤분위실험조(50례)화대조조(50례),분별채용정흡복합전마연합경막외조체여단용정흡복합마취,비교분석량조마취효과、술후소성시간、술후진통등정황。결과:실험조마취효과우급48례,점96%,무1례차급,마취효과현저우우대조조(P<0.05);실험조술후소성시간최단8min,최장36min,평균(24.61±10.12)min,명현우우대조조(P<0.05);실험조술후출현동통감시간평균위(9.20±1.1)h,교대조조현저연장(P<0.01)。결론:정흡복합전마연합응용경막외조체마취구유마취지통효과완전,혈류동역학평은,수술복합용약량감소、마취、수술안전성고등우점。
Objective: To explore the difference between inhalation anesthesia combined epidural block and inhalation anesthesia on upper abdominal surgery. Methods: 100 patients were randomly divided into two groups. The experiment group was given inhalation anesthesia combined epidural block; the control was given inhalation anesthesia. Results: 48 patients were in the superior grade of effective rate 96%, none in poor grade. At anesthetic effect, recovery time, pain time, the experiment group was better than the control. Conclusion: Inhalation anesthesia combined epidural block were complete analgesia, stable blood, less medicine, safe.