化工学报
化工學報
화공학보
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INDUSY AND ENGINEERING (CHINA)
2014年
3期
785-791
,共7页
相平衡%状态方程%凝结%回收率%浓度
相平衡%狀態方程%凝結%迴收率%濃度
상평형%상태방정%응결%회수솔%농도
phase equilibrium%state equation%condensation%recovery ratio%concentration
冷凝法回收油气过程的模拟计算采用何种状态方程尚无定论,建立油气混合物相平衡模型和组分热物理参数模型,进行油气回收过程模拟的对比。相平衡模型主要由状态方程、物质的量平衡方程、热力学平衡条件方程和模型迭代步骤组成,状态方程包括SRK方程、PR方程、TJS方程和理想气体方程。模拟结果表明:状态方程选用SRK、PR和TJS方程,经实验数据验证,满足精度要求;将油气视为理想气体时,计算结果与实际气体状态方程的模拟结果相差较大,冷凝温度越高,偏差越大,油气混合物在冷凝过程中不能视为理想气体;SRK、PR、TJS和Aspen Plus的模拟结果比较一致,相平衡计算应优先选用SRK或TJS方程。
冷凝法迴收油氣過程的模擬計算採用何種狀態方程尚無定論,建立油氣混閤物相平衡模型和組分熱物理參數模型,進行油氣迴收過程模擬的對比。相平衡模型主要由狀態方程、物質的量平衡方程、熱力學平衡條件方程和模型迭代步驟組成,狀態方程包括SRK方程、PR方程、TJS方程和理想氣體方程。模擬結果錶明:狀態方程選用SRK、PR和TJS方程,經實驗數據驗證,滿足精度要求;將油氣視為理想氣體時,計算結果與實際氣體狀態方程的模擬結果相差較大,冷凝溫度越高,偏差越大,油氣混閤物在冷凝過程中不能視為理想氣體;SRK、PR、TJS和Aspen Plus的模擬結果比較一緻,相平衡計算應優先選用SRK或TJS方程。
냉응법회수유기과정적모의계산채용하충상태방정상무정론,건립유기혼합물상평형모형화조분열물리삼수모형,진행유기회수과정모의적대비。상평형모형주요유상태방정、물질적량평형방정、열역학평형조건방정화모형질대보취조성,상태방정포괄SRK방정、PR방정、TJS방정화이상기체방정。모의결과표명:상태방정선용SRK、PR화TJS방정,경실험수거험증,만족정도요구;장유기시위이상기체시,계산결과여실제기체상태방정적모의결과상차교대,냉응온도월고,편차월대,유기혼합물재냉응과정중불능시위이상기체;SRK、PR、TJS화Aspen Plus적모의결과비교일치,상평형계산응우선선용SRK혹TJS방정。
The selection of state equation for simulation of condensing oil-gas recovery is still questionable. In this study, by establishing the phase equilibrium model and thermodynamic parameter models, simulation results of condensing oil-vapor recovery process are compared. The phase equilibrium model is composed of state equations, substance balance equation, and thermodynamic equilibrium equation, with model iteration steps. State equations include SRK, PR, TJS and ideal-gas state equation. The simulations present following results. (1) The simulation results are verified by existing test data. For TJS equation, average deviations of gas and liquid mole fractions are 4.03% and 3.54%, respectively, meeting the precision requirement. For SRK equation, at mole fractions of component higher than 5%, average deviations of CH4 and C2H6 are 2.8%and 3.5%, respectively, while at mole fractions less than 5%, average deviation of C3H8 is 18.5%, meeting the precision requirement. (2) When the oil-gas mixture is considered as ideal gas, the simulation results differ greatly from those with the real-gas state equations, such as SRK, PR or TJS equation, so for the oil-vapor mixture can not be treated as ideal gas, and SRK and TJS equations are preferred. (3) The simulation results of SRK, PR, TJS and Aspen Plus software are equivalent, while the simulation result of PR model is slightly worse. The mathematical model and simulation analysis on condensing oil-vapor recovery process provide theoretical references for future experiment.