中国伤残医学
中國傷殘醫學
중국상잔의학
CHINESE JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND DISABILITY MEDICINE
2014年
6期
27-28
,共2页
2型糖尿病%骨密度%视网膜病变
2型糖尿病%骨密度%視網膜病變
2형당뇨병%골밀도%시망막병변
Diabetes mellitus%Bone mineral density%Diabetic retinopathy
目的：探讨2型糖尿病患者视网膜病变（ DR）与骨密度（ BMD）的关系。方法：检查了63例2型糖尿病患者视网膜，分为A组即正常组、B组单纯性视网膜病变组、C组增殖性视网膜病变组，并分别测定其L2～4椎体、双侧股骨Ward 区BMD 。结果：除A组患者BMD与对照组无明显差异（ p ＞0．05）；B、C组患BMD与对照组差异明显（ p ＜0．01）；糖尿病患者中， C组BMD明显低于A组（ p ＜0．01）。结论：糖尿病视网膜病变患者BMD 比正常人低，增殖性视网膜病变组BMD较其它组显著下降。
目的：探討2型糖尿病患者視網膜病變（ DR）與骨密度（ BMD）的關繫。方法：檢查瞭63例2型糖尿病患者視網膜，分為A組即正常組、B組單純性視網膜病變組、C組增殖性視網膜病變組，併分彆測定其L2～4椎體、雙側股骨Ward 區BMD 。結果：除A組患者BMD與對照組無明顯差異（ p ＞0．05）；B、C組患BMD與對照組差異明顯（ p ＜0．01）；糖尿病患者中， C組BMD明顯低于A組（ p ＜0．01）。結論：糖尿病視網膜病變患者BMD 比正常人低，增殖性視網膜病變組BMD較其它組顯著下降。
목적：탐토2형당뇨병환자시망막병변（ DR）여골밀도（ BMD）적관계。방법：검사료63례2형당뇨병환자시망막，분위A조즉정상조、B조단순성시망막병변조、C조증식성시망막병변조，병분별측정기L2～4추체、쌍측고골Ward 구BMD 。결과：제A조환자BMD여대조조무명현차이（ p ＞0．05）；B、C조환BMD여대조조차이명현（ p ＜0．01）；당뇨병환자중， C조BMD명현저우A조（ p ＜0．01）。결론：당뇨병시망막병변환자BMD 비정상인저，증식성시망막병변조BMD교기타조현저하강。
Objective:To study the relationship between diabetic retinopathy and bone mineral density with type 2 diabetic patients (T2DM) .Methods:Dual energy X -ray absorptiometry was used to measure the bone mineral density (BMD) of lumbar spines(L2 -4) , Ward's triangle in 63 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and 55 cases of normal control group .According to diabetic retinopathy were divided into groups with normal retina (group A), nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (group B) and proliferative diabetic retinopa-thy ( group C) .Results:No significant differences were found in BMD between normal retina l diabetic patients and normal control group ( p >0.05) .BMD was significantly lower in diabetes patient with nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy group and proliferative diabetic retinopathy than the normal control group .In diabetes patient BMD was significantly lower in proliferative diabetic retinopathy group than in normal control groups ( p <0.01) .Conclusion:BMD in diabetes patient with nephropathy should be lower than normal control group.BMD in diabetes patient might be more remarkable in the group with proliferative diabetic retinopathy than in the groups with nor -mal retina and nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy .
