华南理工大学学报(社会科学版)
華南理工大學學報(社會科學版)
화남리공대학학보(사회과학판)
JOURNAL OF SOUTH CHINA UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY(SOCIAL SCIENCE EDITION)
2014年
1期
52-58
,共7页
刑事诉讼%简易程序%科学化%不足%对策
刑事訴訟%簡易程序%科學化%不足%對策
형사소송%간역정서%과학화%불족%대책
Criminal summary procedure%scientific%insufficient%countermeasure
刑事诉讼简易程序在2012年3月全国人大对《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》的修法中被大幅增改。新简易程序保持了在刑事诉讼法中的原有地位,其案件适用标准、审判组织的选择、被告人对适用简易程序的影响、人民检察院派员出席公诉案件庭审、诉讼活动简易范围以及量刑与审限的关联均呈现出新特点,总体上朝科学化方向迈出了更大步伐。新简易程序立法之不足主要表现为编排结构不严密、个别条文内容分布欠当以及部分条文指引不明等等,这些问题都可探索出应对方案,但须通过全国人大修改法律或者最高人民法院作出司法解释才能得到合法解决。
刑事訴訟簡易程序在2012年3月全國人大對《中華人民共和國刑事訴訟法》的脩法中被大幅增改。新簡易程序保持瞭在刑事訴訟法中的原有地位,其案件適用標準、審判組織的選擇、被告人對適用簡易程序的影響、人民檢察院派員齣席公訴案件庭審、訴訟活動簡易範圍以及量刑與審限的關聯均呈現齣新特點,總體上朝科學化方嚮邁齣瞭更大步伐。新簡易程序立法之不足主要錶現為編排結構不嚴密、箇彆條文內容分佈欠噹以及部分條文指引不明等等,這些問題都可探索齣應對方案,但鬚通過全國人大脩改法律或者最高人民法院作齣司法解釋纔能得到閤法解決。
형사소송간역정서재2012년3월전국인대대《중화인민공화국형사소송법》적수법중피대폭증개。신간역정서보지료재형사소송법중적원유지위,기안건괄용표준、심판조직적선택、피고인대괄용간역정서적영향、인민검찰원파원출석공소안건정심、소송활동간역범위이급양형여심한적관련균정현출신특점,총체상조과학화방향매출료경대보벌。신간역정서입법지불족주요표현위편배결구불엄밀、개별조문내용분포흠당이급부분조문지인불명등등,저사문제도가탐색출응대방안,단수통과전국인대수개법률혹자최고인민법원작출사법해석재능득도합법해결。
Criminal summary procedure is substantially changed in revising Criminal Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China by NPC in March 2012.New simple procedure maintains its customary position in code of crimi-nal procedure.It presents new features in many ways such as its case applicable standards,option of the trial or-ganization,defendant's influence on applying to simple procedure,People's Procuratorate appointing staff attending court in case of public prosecution,simple range of litigation activity and relevance of measurement of penalty and institution of Time Limitation,and walks out greater pace towards scientific direction as a whole.The shortage of legislation of New simple procedure displays mainly on imprecision of the structure,distribution of content of indi-vidual provisions being indecent and parts of provisions guiding unknown,and so on.These issues could be tracked out replying schemes,which be legally solved by means of revising the law by NPC or making judicial interpretation by the Supreme People's Court.