南京林业大学学报(自然科学版)
南京林業大學學報(自然科學版)
남경임업대학학보(자연과학판)
JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY(NATURAL SCIENCE EDITION)
2014年
2期
63-67
,共5页
刘洋%亢新刚%郭艳荣%铁牛%高祥%赵东宁
劉洋%亢新剛%郭豔榮%鐵牛%高祥%趙東寧
류양%항신강%곽염영%철우%고상%조동저
云冷杉林%杨桦次生林%落叶松人工林%林分生长模型%长白山
雲冷杉林%楊樺次生林%落葉鬆人工林%林分生長模型%長白山
운랭삼림%양화차생림%락협송인공림%림분생장모형%장백산
spruce-fir and broad-leaved mixed forest%birch-aspen mixed broad leaved secondary forest%plantation forest consisting of larch%growth process model%Changbai Mountain
利用924株冷杉、844株云杉、183株白桦、158株山杨和227株落叶松解析木的数据,建立了长白山优势树种的直径生长方程。在相同的立地条件下,利用长白山245块云冷杉林、32块杨桦次生林和260块落叶松人工林固定样地,结合优势树种的直径生长方程,分析了长白山3种主要林型林分的平均直径、树高、单位面积林木平均株数和蓄积的生长过程。另外,用未参与建模的28块云冷杉林、4块杨桦次生林和30块落叶松人工林固定复测样地对拟合的3种林型林分生长过程模型进行检验,结果显示预估的相对误差为3.26%~4.96%,估计精度为95.04%~96.74%。
利用924株冷杉、844株雲杉、183株白樺、158株山楊和227株落葉鬆解析木的數據,建立瞭長白山優勢樹種的直徑生長方程。在相同的立地條件下,利用長白山245塊雲冷杉林、32塊楊樺次生林和260塊落葉鬆人工林固定樣地,結閤優勢樹種的直徑生長方程,分析瞭長白山3種主要林型林分的平均直徑、樹高、單位麵積林木平均株數和蓄積的生長過程。另外,用未參與建模的28塊雲冷杉林、4塊楊樺次生林和30塊落葉鬆人工林固定複測樣地對擬閤的3種林型林分生長過程模型進行檢驗,結果顯示預估的相對誤差為3.26%~4.96%,估計精度為95.04%~96.74%。
이용924주랭삼、844주운삼、183주백화、158주산양화227주락협송해석목적수거,건립료장백산우세수충적직경생장방정。재상동적입지조건하,이용장백산245괴운랭삼림、32괴양화차생림화260괴락협송인공림고정양지,결합우세수충적직경생장방정,분석료장백산3충주요림형림분적평균직경、수고、단위면적림목평균주수화축적적생장과정。령외,용미삼여건모적28괴운랭삼림、4괴양화차생림화30괴락협송인공림고정복측양지대의합적3충림형림분생장과정모형진행검험,결과현시예고적상대오차위3.26%~4.96%,고계정도위95.04%~96.74%。
The analytic trees for 924 firs ( Abies fabri) , 844 spruces ( Picea asperata) , 183 birchs ( Betula platphylla) , 158 aspens ( Populus davidiana ) and 227 larchs ( Larix olgensis ) were selected to establish the models of diameter growth for dominant tree species in the Changbai Mountain. The study was conducted in 245 spruce-fir and broad-leaved mixed forests, 32 birch-aspen mixed broad leaved secondary forests, 260 plantation forests consisting of larch. At a cer-tain site, we analyzed the stand growth process for the average diameter, tree height, number of trees per unit area and volume of three dominant forest types in Changbai Mountain based on diameter growth models of the dominant tree spe-cies. Besides, the fitting growth process models were tested by the permanent sample plots of 28 spruce-fir and broad-leaved mixed forests, 4 birch-aspen mixed broad leaved secondary forests and 30 plantation forests consisting of larch which did not participate model fitting. It was found that the relative error of estimation was 3.26%-4.96% and the esti-mated accuracy was 95.04%-96.74%.