中国骨与关节杂志
中國骨與關節雜誌
중국골여관절잡지
Chinese Journal of Bone and Joint
2014年
4期
292-296
,共5页
曹代桂%冯世庆%周先虎%周恒星%张超%褚天慈%姚立炜%郝岩
曹代桂%馮世慶%週先虎%週恆星%張超%褚天慈%姚立煒%郝巖
조대계%풍세경%주선호%주항성%장초%저천자%요립위%학암
骨关节炎,膝%膝关节%治疗结果%神经妥乐平%塞来昔布
骨關節炎,膝%膝關節%治療結果%神經妥樂平%塞來昔佈
골관절염,슬%슬관절%치료결과%신경타악평%새래석포
Osteoarthritis,knee%Knee joint%Treatment outcome%Neurotropin%Celecoxib
目的:观察Neurotropin联合Celecoxib治疗膝关节骨性关节炎(kneeosteoarthritis,KOA)的疗效和安全性。方法采用随机、平行对照研究临床方法,将130例膝关节关节骨关节炎患者随机分为两组,对照组和试验组各为65例。对照组给予口服Celecoxib,实验组给予口服Celecoxib和Neurotropin,共治疗4周,停药后继续观察2周。采用Lequesne指数作为疗效评分标准,观察服药前后膝关节症状变化:包括休息痛、运动痛、压痛、肿胀、晨僵和行走能力的改善程度,记录治疗效果、不良反应及实验室生化指标等。结果治疗后4周,两组Lequesne总指数与治疗前相比,均明显下降。继续观察2周,两组都能维持原有的治疗效果。治疗后6周,试验组总有效率明显优于对照组(94%比88%)。安全性方面两组比较差异无统计学意义。结论 Neurotropin联合Celecoxib治疗KOA,能明显改善患者的临床症状,并不增加副反应,疗效优于单纯的Celecoxib治疗。
目的:觀察Neurotropin聯閤Celecoxib治療膝關節骨性關節炎(kneeosteoarthritis,KOA)的療效和安全性。方法採用隨機、平行對照研究臨床方法,將130例膝關節關節骨關節炎患者隨機分為兩組,對照組和試驗組各為65例。對照組給予口服Celecoxib,實驗組給予口服Celecoxib和Neurotropin,共治療4週,停藥後繼續觀察2週。採用Lequesne指數作為療效評分標準,觀察服藥前後膝關節癥狀變化:包括休息痛、運動痛、壓痛、腫脹、晨僵和行走能力的改善程度,記錄治療效果、不良反應及實驗室生化指標等。結果治療後4週,兩組Lequesne總指數與治療前相比,均明顯下降。繼續觀察2週,兩組都能維持原有的治療效果。治療後6週,試驗組總有效率明顯優于對照組(94%比88%)。安全性方麵兩組比較差異無統計學意義。結論 Neurotropin聯閤Celecoxib治療KOA,能明顯改善患者的臨床癥狀,併不增加副反應,療效優于單純的Celecoxib治療。
목적:관찰Neurotropin연합Celecoxib치료슬관절골성관절염(kneeosteoarthritis,KOA)적료효화안전성。방법채용수궤、평행대조연구림상방법,장130례슬관절관절골관절염환자수궤분위량조,대조조화시험조각위65례。대조조급여구복Celecoxib,실험조급여구복Celecoxib화Neurotropin,공치료4주,정약후계속관찰2주。채용Lequesne지수작위료효평분표준,관찰복약전후슬관절증상변화:포괄휴식통、운동통、압통、종창、신강화행주능력적개선정도,기록치료효과、불량반응급실험실생화지표등。결과치료후4주,량조Lequesne총지수여치료전상비,균명현하강。계속관찰2주,량조도능유지원유적치료효과。치료후6주,시험조총유효솔명현우우대조조(94%비88%)。안전성방면량조비교차이무통계학의의。결론 Neurotropin연합Celecoxib치료KOA,능명현개선환자적림상증상,병불증가부반응,료효우우단순적Celecoxib치료。
Objective To evaluate the therapeutic effects and safety of a combined therapy of neurotropin ( NTP ) and celecoxib in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis ( KOA ). Methods A randomized and parallel-controlled clinical trial was performed in 130 patients with KOA, who were randomly divided into 2 groups. The patients in the control group only took celecoxib orally ( n=65 ), and the patients in the experimental group took both NTP and celecoxib orally ( n=65 ). All the patients were treated for 4 weeks, and then were observed for the next 2 weeks. According to Lequesne’s criteria, the improvement in knee joint symptoms were evaluated before and after the treatment, including knee pain at rest, at movement and at pressure, knee swelling, morning stiffness and walking ability. The therapeutic effects, adverse events and biochemical indexes were also recorded. Results The Lequesne’s total scores in both groups were obviously reduced after 4 weeks of treatment when compared with those before the treatment. The therapeutic effects in both groups were maintained for the next 2 weeks after the discontinuation of treatment. The total effective rate in the experimental group ( 94%) after 6 weeks of treatment was much higher than that in the control group ( 88%). There were no statistically signiifcant differences in the safety between the 2 groups. Conclusions The combined therapy of NTP and celecoxib for KOA is signiifcantly more effective than the celecoxib alone. The clinical symptoms of the patients can be obviously improved, without new adverse events.