实用皮肤病学杂志
實用皮膚病學雜誌
실용피부병학잡지
JOURNAL OF PRACTRCAL DERMATOLOGY
2014年
2期
110-111,118
,共3页
敖劲松%王予屏%邱承俊
敖勁鬆%王予屏%邱承俊
오경송%왕여병%구승준
尖锐湿疣,尿道内%光动力疗法,氨基酮戊酸%钬激光
尖銳濕疣,尿道內%光動力療法,氨基酮戊痠%鈥激光
첨예습우,뇨도내%광동력요법,안기동무산%화격광
Condyloma acuminate,urethra%ALA-PDT%Holmium laser%Ureteroscope
目的:比较经尿道输尿管镜光动力疗法和钬激光治疗男性尿道内尖锐湿疣的疗效和安全性。方法126例男性尿道内尖锐湿疣患者随机分为试验组和对照组,每组63例。试验组采用光动力治疗,对照组采用钬激光治疗。治疗后观察疗效、复发率及不良反应。结果试验组患者痊愈率和有效率分别为80.95%(51/63)和95.24%(60/63);对照组患者痊愈率和有效率分别为58.73%(37/63)和82.54%(52/63),两组痊愈率和有效率比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01&P<0.05)。所有患者均随访6个月,试验组复发率为12.70%(8/63),明显低于对照组的复发率26.98%(17/63),两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。试验组患者治疗后无尿道出血、尿道狭窄和瘢痕,而对照组分别有3例(4.8%)和5例(7.9%)患者出现尿道狭窄和瘢痕。结论经尿道输尿管镜光动力治疗尿道内尖锐湿疣临床有效、不良反应小、复发率低。
目的:比較經尿道輸尿管鏡光動力療法和鈥激光治療男性尿道內尖銳濕疣的療效和安全性。方法126例男性尿道內尖銳濕疣患者隨機分為試驗組和對照組,每組63例。試驗組採用光動力治療,對照組採用鈥激光治療。治療後觀察療效、複髮率及不良反應。結果試驗組患者痊愈率和有效率分彆為80.95%(51/63)和95.24%(60/63);對照組患者痊愈率和有效率分彆為58.73%(37/63)和82.54%(52/63),兩組痊愈率和有效率比較,差異有統計學意義(P<0.01&P<0.05)。所有患者均隨訪6箇月,試驗組複髮率為12.70%(8/63),明顯低于對照組的複髮率26.98%(17/63),兩組比較差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。試驗組患者治療後無尿道齣血、尿道狹窄和瘢痕,而對照組分彆有3例(4.8%)和5例(7.9%)患者齣現尿道狹窄和瘢痕。結論經尿道輸尿管鏡光動力治療尿道內尖銳濕疣臨床有效、不良反應小、複髮率低。
목적:비교경뇨도수뇨관경광동력요법화화격광치료남성뇨도내첨예습우적료효화안전성。방법126례남성뇨도내첨예습우환자수궤분위시험조화대조조,매조63례。시험조채용광동력치료,대조조채용화격광치료。치료후관찰료효、복발솔급불량반응。결과시험조환자전유솔화유효솔분별위80.95%(51/63)화95.24%(60/63);대조조환자전유솔화유효솔분별위58.73%(37/63)화82.54%(52/63),량조전유솔화유효솔비교,차이유통계학의의(P<0.01&P<0.05)。소유환자균수방6개월,시험조복발솔위12.70%(8/63),명현저우대조조적복발솔26.98%(17/63),량조비교차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。시험조환자치료후무뇨도출혈、뇨도협착화반흔,이대조조분별유3례(4.8%)화5례(7.9%)환자출현뇨도협착화반흔。결론경뇨도수뇨관경광동력치료뇨도내첨예습우림상유효、불량반응소、복발솔저。
Objective To compare the therapeutical efifcacy and safety of photodynamie therapy with aminolevulinie acid (ALA-PDT) and holmium laser in urethral condyloma acuminatum. Methods The 126 cases of male urethra genital warts were randomly divided into the test group and the control group. Test group were treated by ALA-PDT, and control group were treaed by holmium laser. Local adverse reactions, extent of resolution of the lesions, time for resolution of the lesions and relapse rate were evaluated after treatment. Results Healing rate and effective rate in test group was 80.95%(51/63) and 95.24%(60/63) showing statistical difference (P<0.01&P<0.05) compared with those in control group. The relapse rate in test group was 12.70%(8/63), which was signiifcantly lower than that control group 26.98%(17/63). The incidence of urethrorrhagia, urethral stricture or scar was zero in test group, while it was 3(4.8%) and 5(7.9%) patients respectively in control group. Conclusion ALA-PDT therapy has the advantages of a higher therapeutic efifcacy, a lower relapse rate and fewer side effects in the treatment of urethral condyloma acuminatum.