大连大学学报
大連大學學報
대련대학학보
JOURNAL OF DALIAN UNIVERSITY
2014年
1期
75-79
,共5页
萨满文化%萧红%迟子建%对话
薩滿文化%蕭紅%遲子建%對話
살만문화%소홍%지자건%대화
Shamanism%Xiao Hong%Chi Zijian%Dialogue
萧红、迟子建这两位东北女性作家虽然存在于不同的历史时空语境中,但她们同样以深深扎根于东北大地的创作实践承传着萨满文化精神,“和而不同”地显现出独具风貌的地缘文化特色,可堪“对话”:在创作视野上,她们共同关注万物有灵的黑土地,但萧红是“审丑”式的祛魅批判,迟子建则是审美式的附魅讴歌;在审美风格上,她们都展现出一种复归原始自然的野性悲壮的生命强力,但萧红世界洋溢着一种酒神式个体毁灭的痛楚快感,迟子建世界则充溢着一种纵情地编织迷人梦境的日神式光明;在文本叙事上,她们都运用双声话语进行表达,但萧红以女性眼光与智性眼光相结合去透视,而迟子建则将母性眼光和生态眼光融合一起去展望;在创作思维上,她们都无法摆脱缘自原始惧感思维的死亡情结,但萧红秉持着一种“向死而生”的佛家式苦难意识,迟子建则汲取了“生死齐一”的道家式超然哲学。
蕭紅、遲子建這兩位東北女性作傢雖然存在于不同的歷史時空語境中,但她們同樣以深深扎根于東北大地的創作實踐承傳著薩滿文化精神,“和而不同”地顯現齣獨具風貌的地緣文化特色,可堪“對話”:在創作視野上,她們共同關註萬物有靈的黑土地,但蕭紅是“審醜”式的祛魅批判,遲子建則是審美式的附魅謳歌;在審美風格上,她們都展現齣一種複歸原始自然的野性悲壯的生命彊力,但蕭紅世界洋溢著一種酒神式箇體燬滅的痛楚快感,遲子建世界則充溢著一種縱情地編織迷人夢境的日神式光明;在文本敘事上,她們都運用雙聲話語進行錶達,但蕭紅以女性眼光與智性眼光相結閤去透視,而遲子建則將母性眼光和生態眼光融閤一起去展望;在創作思維上,她們都無法襬脫緣自原始懼感思維的死亡情結,但蕭紅秉持著一種“嚮死而生”的彿傢式苦難意識,遲子建則伋取瞭“生死齊一”的道傢式超然哲學。
소홍、지자건저량위동북녀성작가수연존재우불동적역사시공어경중,단저문동양이심심찰근우동북대지적창작실천승전착살만문화정신,“화이불동”지현현출독구풍모적지연문화특색,가감“대화”:재창작시야상,저문공동관주만물유령적흑토지,단소홍시“심축”식적거매비판,지자건칙시심미식적부매구가;재심미풍격상,저문도전현출일충복귀원시자연적야성비장적생명강력,단소홍세계양일착일충주신식개체훼멸적통초쾌감,지자건세계칙충일착일충종정지편직미인몽경적일신식광명;재문본서사상,저문도운용쌍성화어진행표체,단소홍이녀성안광여지성안광상결합거투시,이지자건칙장모성안광화생태안광융합일기거전망;재창작사유상,저문도무법파탈연자원시구감사유적사망정결,단소홍병지착일충“향사이생”적불가식고난의식,지자건칙급취료“생사제일”적도가식초연철학。
As two women writers of Northeast China, Xiao Hong and Chi Zijian, though in different eras, both root in a writing practice about Chinese northeast culture in order to carry on the spirit of Shamanism. They show the unique geo-cultural characteristics with”heterogeneous isomorphism”, which can be called‘dialogue’ . In terms of creative vision, their common concern lies in the animism of the “black land”, however, Xiao Hong criticizes ugliness and Chi Zijian eulogizes goodness;in terms of the aesthetics style, they show a wild tragic vitality reverted to nature, but the former is filled with dionysian pain pleasure from individual destruction and the later is imbued with brightness of Sun God arbitrarily weaving fascinating dreams;in terms of the text narra-tive, it is expressed in the use of alliteration discourse by both, but Xiao Hong sees it through in the perspective of female childlike innocence and Chi Zijian of maternal one;and in terms of the creative ideas, they can not get rid of death complex from the original thinking, however, the former holds a Buddhist ‘Being-towards-death’ suffering consciousness and the later absorbs a Taoist ‘Being-with-death’transcendental philosophy.