临床超声医学杂志
臨床超聲醫學雜誌
림상초성의학잡지
JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN CLINICAL M,EDICINE
2014年
2期
30-32
,共3页
杨光飞%米成嵘%王文
楊光飛%米成嶸%王文
양광비%미성영%왕문
超声检查,术中%脑胶质瘤
超聲檢查,術中%腦膠質瘤
초성검사,술중%뇌효질류
Ultrasonography,intraoperation%Brain glioma
目的:探讨超声造影在判断脑胶质瘤手术肿瘤残留中的应用价值。方法31例胶质瘤患者,于术中瘤体摘除前后行常规超声和超声造影检查,对照术前肿瘤回声及超声造影特点观察术后手术残腔以判断肿瘤残余情况。结果以病理结果为金标准,常规手术与超声造影引导下手术肿瘤全切除率分别为45.16%和74.19%(P<0.05)。超声造影判断残余肿瘤的敏感性为85.71%,特异性为90.32%;常规超声判断残余肿瘤的敏感性为61.91%%,特异性为83.87%。超声造影判断肿瘤残留病理符合率与常规超声差异无统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论超声造影在胶质瘤手术肿瘤残留判断中具有较好的临床辅助价值。
目的:探討超聲造影在判斷腦膠質瘤手術腫瘤殘留中的應用價值。方法31例膠質瘤患者,于術中瘤體摘除前後行常規超聲和超聲造影檢查,對照術前腫瘤迴聲及超聲造影特點觀察術後手術殘腔以判斷腫瘤殘餘情況。結果以病理結果為金標準,常規手術與超聲造影引導下手術腫瘤全切除率分彆為45.16%和74.19%(P<0.05)。超聲造影判斷殘餘腫瘤的敏感性為85.71%,特異性為90.32%;常規超聲判斷殘餘腫瘤的敏感性為61.91%%,特異性為83.87%。超聲造影判斷腫瘤殘留病理符閤率與常規超聲差異無統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論超聲造影在膠質瘤手術腫瘤殘留判斷中具有較好的臨床輔助價值。
목적:탐토초성조영재판단뇌효질류수술종류잔류중적응용개치。방법31례효질류환자,우술중류체적제전후행상규초성화초성조영검사,대조술전종류회성급초성조영특점관찰술후수술잔강이판단종류잔여정황。결과이병리결과위금표준,상규수술여초성조영인도하수술종류전절제솔분별위45.16%화74.19%(P<0.05)。초성조영판단잔여종류적민감성위85.71%,특이성위90.32%;상규초성판단잔여종류적민감성위61.91%%,특이성위83.87%。초성조영판단종류잔류병리부합솔여상규초성차이무통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론초성조영재효질류수술종류잔류판단중구유교호적림상보조개치。
Objective To explore application value of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in judging tumor residues after brain glioma operation. Methods Thirty-one patients with brain glioma were examined by conventional ultrasonography and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography before and after removal of tumor. Compared with preoperative tumor echo and imaging characteristics, tumor residual cavities after operation were observed to judge residual tumor. Results The tumor resection rates of routine operation and contrast-enhanced ultrasound guided operation were 45.16%and 74.19%, respectively, in which the latter was higher than the former (P<0.05) according to pathologic result. The sensitivity of judging residual tumor using contrast-enhanced ultrasonography was 85.71%and the specificity was 90.32%. However, the sensitivity of conventional ultrasonography was 61.91% and the specificity was 83.87%. There was significant difference in pathology coincidence rate of residual tumor between contrast-enhanced ultrasonography and conventional ultrasonography ( P<0 . 05 ) . Conclusion Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography has important clinical value in judging tumor residues after brain glioma operation.