CAJ | 학술논문

《中华人民共和国合同法》(以下简称《合同法》)第122条对违约责任与侵权责任竞合的产生和处理规则做出了立法规定。在快递服务损害赔偿中，在所寄物品属于寄件人情况下，发生快递丢失、内件短少和毁损时，会导致违约责任与侵权责任的竞合。此时消费者有权依据《合同法》第122条选择追究快递服务企业的违约责任或侵权责任，但这种选择各有利弊。研究快递服务损害赔偿中违约责任与侵权责任的竞合，有利于最大限度保护消费者的合法权益。
《중화인민공화국합동법》(이하간칭《합동법》)제122조대위약책임여침권책임경합적산생화처리규칙주출료입법규정。재쾌체복무손해배상중，재소기물품속우기건인정황하，발생쾌체주실、내건단소화훼손시，회도치위약책임여침권책임적경합。차시소비자유권의거《합동법》제122조선택추구쾌체복무기업적위약책임혹침권책임，단저충선택각유리폐。연구쾌체복무손해배상중위약책임여침권책임적경합，유리우최대한도보호소비자적합법권익。
Article 122 of " Contract Law of the People ' s Republic of China" stipulates clearly the countermeasures to co-opetition of liability for breach of contract and tortious liability. The co-opetition about liability for breach of contract and tortious liability will happen if loss, inner content loss or damage occurs in express service. The consumers have the right to choose ascertaining liability for breach of contract or tortious liability according to article 122 of the Contract Law. But each of the choices has advantages and disadvantages. This research aims at protecting the interests of consumers.