江汉大学学报(自然科学版)
江漢大學學報(自然科學版)
강한대학학보(자연과학판)
JOURNAL OF JIANGHAN UNIVERSITY(NATURAL SCIENCES)
2014年
1期
64-67
,共4页
夏恒建%董元火%廖新安%陈盛秋%张亮红%何世民
夏恆建%董元火%廖新安%陳盛鞦%張亮紅%何世民
하항건%동원화%료신안%진성추%장량홍%하세민
夏枯草%规范化栽培%正交试验%产量%迷迭香酸
夏枯草%規範化栽培%正交試驗%產量%迷迭香痠
하고초%규범화재배%정교시험%산량%미질향산
Prunella vulgaris L.%standardized cultivation%orthogonal experiment%yield%rosmarinic acid
采用正交试验,分析不同播种期(B1、B2、B3)和不同施肥方式(F0、F1、F2)对3种不同夏枯草品种(湖北蕲春品种,Q;江西樟树品种,J;河南确山品种,H)的产量和品质的影响,确定适合蕲春地区的品种及规范化栽培技术。结果表明:在施肥方式F2中,(1)在B1期,品种Q的鲜果球重、有效果球总数和干果球重都高于J和H品种(P﹤0.05),而迷迭香酸含量在3个品种中基本一致(0.36%以上),表明品种Q在B1期表现最佳;(2)在B2期,品种H的鲜果球重、有效果球总数和干果球重都高于其他2个品种(Q和J)(P﹤0.05),表明H品种在B2期表现较好;(3)在B3期,3个品种所有参数差异均无统计学意义。在施肥方式F1和F0中,3个品种的迷迭香酸含量在不同播期总体低于F2施肥方式。综合评价表明,品种Q为优先培育品种,其播种期为B1期,施肥方式为F2,而品种H可适度种植。
採用正交試驗,分析不同播種期(B1、B2、B3)和不同施肥方式(F0、F1、F2)對3種不同夏枯草品種(湖北蘄春品種,Q;江西樟樹品種,J;河南確山品種,H)的產量和品質的影響,確定適閤蘄春地區的品種及規範化栽培技術。結果錶明:在施肥方式F2中,(1)在B1期,品種Q的鮮果毬重、有效果毬總數和榦果毬重都高于J和H品種(P﹤0.05),而迷迭香痠含量在3箇品種中基本一緻(0.36%以上),錶明品種Q在B1期錶現最佳;(2)在B2期,品種H的鮮果毬重、有效果毬總數和榦果毬重都高于其他2箇品種(Q和J)(P﹤0.05),錶明H品種在B2期錶現較好;(3)在B3期,3箇品種所有參數差異均無統計學意義。在施肥方式F1和F0中,3箇品種的迷迭香痠含量在不同播期總體低于F2施肥方式。綜閤評價錶明,品種Q為優先培育品種,其播種期為B1期,施肥方式為F2,而品種H可適度種植。
채용정교시험,분석불동파충기(B1、B2、B3)화불동시비방식(F0、F1、F2)대3충불동하고초품충(호북기춘품충,Q;강서장수품충,J;하남학산품충,H)적산량화품질적영향,학정괄합기춘지구적품충급규범화재배기술。결과표명:재시비방식F2중,(1)재B1기,품충Q적선과구중、유효과구총수화간과구중도고우J화H품충(P﹤0.05),이미질향산함량재3개품충중기본일치(0.36%이상),표명품충Q재B1기표현최가;(2)재B2기,품충H적선과구중、유효과구총수화간과구중도고우기타2개품충(Q화J)(P﹤0.05),표명H품충재B2기표현교호;(3)재B3기,3개품충소유삼수차이균무통계학의의。재시비방식F1화F0중,3개품충적미질향산함량재불동파기총체저우F2시비방식。종합평개표명,품충Q위우선배육품충,기파충기위B1기,시비방식위F2,이품충H가괄도충식。
To screen high yield and good quality Prunella vulgaris L. varieties,which could be suitable for cultivation at Qichun areas,yield and quality of three Prunella vulgaris L. varieties(Hu-bei Qichun,Q;Jiangxi Zhangshu,J;Henan Queshan,H)were evaluated with an orthogonal exper-iment,according to the same plot,three different sowing dates(B1,B2,B3,respectively)and dif-ferent fertilization treatments(F0,F1,F2,respectively). The results showed that:In F2 fertiliza-tion treatment,⑴In the B1 period,wet weight,total effective number and dry grain of fruit ear of Q variety were higher than that of J and H varieties(P < 0. 05),and rosmarinic acid content of three varieties was consistent(more than 0. 36%),indicating that Q variety is better in the B1 period.⑵In the B2 period,wet weight,total effective number and dry grain of fruit ear of H variety were high-er than that in the other two cultivars(Q and J)(P<0. 05),and rosmarinic acid content of three va-rieties was consistent(0. 27%~0. 29%),indicating that H variety is better in the B2 period.⑶ In the B3 period,all parameters of three varieties(Q,J,H)were no significant differences. The con-tent of rosmarinic acid of the fertilization F1 and F0 in different sowing dates was lower than that of F2 fertilization. Comprehensive evaluation showed that the Q variety could be used as the preferred cultivation and planting variety,with sowing date in the B1 period and F2 fertilization treatment, and the H variety could be moderately developed in Qichun areas.