山东工会论坛
山東工會論罈
산동공회론단
Shan Dong Trade Unions Tribune
2014年
2期
1-5
,共5页
工会职能%维权乏力%职工素质%法律缺陷%维权环境%维权模式
工會職能%維權乏力%職工素質%法律缺陷%維權環境%維權模式
공회직능%유권핍력%직공소질%법률결함%유권배경%유권모식
trade union functions%fatigue in safeguarding rights%staff quality%legal defects%rights environment%the mode of safeguard rights
维护职工合法权益是中国工会的基本职责,然而现实是工会的维权相当乏力。导致工会维权乏力的主要原因,一是从维权的主体-工会自身来看,我国工会缺乏维权经历和维权的独立性基础,工会干部自身素质也不适应维权要求。二是从工会维权的对象-职工角度来看,职工维权意识不强,维权意念分化,对工会缺乏信任和信心。三是从工会维权的工具-法律角度来看,职工维权的成本太高,工会权利和职责不对衬,企业工会独立法人地位难以保障。四是从工会维权的环境-体制机制角度来看,工会维权与社会大局存在冲突,工会宏观维权的渠道不畅,行业工会组织相对薄弱、地方工会和企业工会各行其责的维权模式也存在一定障碍。当前解决工会维权乏力的基本思路就是要强化工会的维权职能,提升工会的维权能力和水平。具体举措有:一是提升工会维权的社会认可度;二是解决工会干部维权的后顾之忧;三是推行“上代下”的工会维权模式;四是构建工会维权的社会联动格局;五是创造硬条件在身份上增强工会的独立性。六是在法律上要努力争取工会维权的刚性武器。
維護職工閤法權益是中國工會的基本職責,然而現實是工會的維權相噹乏力。導緻工會維權乏力的主要原因,一是從維權的主體-工會自身來看,我國工會缺乏維權經歷和維權的獨立性基礎,工會榦部自身素質也不適應維權要求。二是從工會維權的對象-職工角度來看,職工維權意識不彊,維權意唸分化,對工會缺乏信任和信心。三是從工會維權的工具-法律角度來看,職工維權的成本太高,工會權利和職責不對襯,企業工會獨立法人地位難以保障。四是從工會維權的環境-體製機製角度來看,工會維權與社會大跼存在遲突,工會宏觀維權的渠道不暢,行業工會組織相對薄弱、地方工會和企業工會各行其責的維權模式也存在一定障礙。噹前解決工會維權乏力的基本思路就是要彊化工會的維權職能,提升工會的維權能力和水平。具體舉措有:一是提升工會維權的社會認可度;二是解決工會榦部維權的後顧之憂;三是推行“上代下”的工會維權模式;四是構建工會維權的社會聯動格跼;五是創造硬條件在身份上增彊工會的獨立性。六是在法律上要努力爭取工會維權的剛性武器。
유호직공합법권익시중국공회적기본직책,연이현실시공회적유권상당핍력。도치공회유권핍력적주요원인,일시종유권적주체-공회자신래간,아국공회결핍유권경력화유권적독립성기출,공회간부자신소질야불괄응유권요구。이시종공회유권적대상-직공각도래간,직공유권의식불강,유권의념분화,대공회결핍신임화신심。삼시종공회유권적공구-법률각도래간,직공유권적성본태고,공회권리화직책불대츤,기업공회독입법인지위난이보장。사시종공회유권적배경-체제궤제각도래간,공회유권여사회대국존재충돌,공회굉관유권적거도불창,행업공회조직상대박약、지방공회화기업공회각행기책적유권모식야존재일정장애。당전해결공회유권핍력적기본사로취시요강화공회적유권직능,제승공회적유권능력화수평。구체거조유:일시제승공회유권적사회인가도;이시해결공회간부유권적후고지우;삼시추행“상대하”적공회유권모식;사시구건공회유권적사회련동격국;오시창조경조건재신빈상증강공회적독립성。륙시재법률상요노력쟁취공회유권적강성무기。
safeguarding the legitimate rights and interests of workers is a fundamental responsibility of the Chinese trade unions, but the reality is that trade unions’safeguarding rights is quite weak. The main reasons leading to the weakness are as following:firstly, from the perspective of trade union itself, the main bodies of safeguarding rights, Chinese trade unions lack the experience and the independence foundation, and the quality of union cadres can not meet their requirements;secondly, from the perspective of workers, the objects of safeguarding rights, their awareness of safe-guarding rights is not strong, their ideas is differentiation, and their trust and confidence in the trade unions is not enough;thirdly, from the perspective of law, a tool of safeguarding rights, the cost of safeguarding rights is too high, trade unions’rights and responsibilities are not of symmetry, and to guarantee enterprise unions’independent legal position is difficult; fourthly, from the perspective of institutional mechanisms, the environment of safeguarding rights, there are conflict between the trade unions’safeguarding rights and social overall situation, the channels of macro safeguarding rights are not smooth, the organizations of trade unions are relatively weak, and there are some obstacles in the models that local unions and trade unions play their own roles. Currently the basic idea to resolve the weakness of trade unions’safeguarding rights is to strengthen the functions of trade unions, and enhance the ability and level of trade unions’safeguarding rights. Specific initiatives are:Firstly, enhancing social acceptance of trade unions’safeguarding rights;secondly, solving the worries of trade union cadres about safeguarding rights;Thirdly, implementing the model of“the superior replace the subordinate”;fourthly, building social interaction pattern for trade unions to safeguard rights;fifthly, creating the conditions to strengthen the independence of the trade unions on the identity;Sixthly, striving in law for the rigid arms for trade union to safeguard rights.