山西中医学院学报
山西中醫學院學報
산서중의학원학보
JOURNAL OF SHANXI COLLEGE OF TRADITIONAL CHINESE MEDICINE
2014年
1期
60-62
,共3页
刘海明%杨刚%潘兵%张志敬
劉海明%楊剛%潘兵%張誌敬
류해명%양강%반병%장지경
腰椎翻修术%椎间孔椎间融合术%外科手术
腰椎翻脩術%椎間孔椎間融閤術%外科手術
요추번수술%추간공추간융합술%외과수술
lumar revision surgery%transforaminal lumar interbody fusion%surgical operation
目的:探讨经椎旁肌间隙入路单侧椎弓根固定结合改良椎间孔椎间融合术在腰椎翻修术中的临床疗效。方法:回顾性研究2008年3月-2010年5月我院采用上述方法治疗的26例腰椎翻修患者,收集分析手术切口长度、手术时间和术中出血量,对比分析翻修术前、末次随访时腰痛及腿痛VAS评分,临床疗效评估采用29分法(JOA)评分,并计算临床疗效改善率。结果:手术切口长度为(4.1±0.5)cm、手术时间为(119.3±25.8)min、术中出血量为(193.3±14.6)mL,腰痛VAS评分、腿痛VAS评分术前为(4.98±0.65)分和(7.21±0.34)分,末次随访为(0.90±0.69)分和(1.41±0.28)分,与术前比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);JOA评分术前为(13.8±4.4)分,末次随访为(24.1±2.8)分,与术前比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:该法切口小,术中出血少,术后腰背痛缓解快,是腰椎翻修的一种可行方法。
目的:探討經椎徬肌間隙入路單側椎弓根固定結閤改良椎間孔椎間融閤術在腰椎翻脩術中的臨床療效。方法:迴顧性研究2008年3月-2010年5月我院採用上述方法治療的26例腰椎翻脩患者,收集分析手術切口長度、手術時間和術中齣血量,對比分析翻脩術前、末次隨訪時腰痛及腿痛VAS評分,臨床療效評估採用29分法(JOA)評分,併計算臨床療效改善率。結果:手術切口長度為(4.1±0.5)cm、手術時間為(119.3±25.8)min、術中齣血量為(193.3±14.6)mL,腰痛VAS評分、腿痛VAS評分術前為(4.98±0.65)分和(7.21±0.34)分,末次隨訪為(0.90±0.69)分和(1.41±0.28)分,與術前比較差異均有統計學意義(P<0.05);JOA評分術前為(13.8±4.4)分,末次隨訪為(24.1±2.8)分,與術前比較差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論:該法切口小,術中齣血少,術後腰揹痛緩解快,是腰椎翻脩的一種可行方法。
목적:탐토경추방기간극입로단측추궁근고정결합개량추간공추간융합술재요추번수술중적림상료효。방법:회고성연구2008년3월-2010년5월아원채용상술방법치료적26례요추번수환자,수집분석수술절구장도、수술시간화술중출혈량,대비분석번수술전、말차수방시요통급퇴통VAS평분,림상료효평고채용29분법(JOA)평분,병계산림상료효개선솔。결과:수술절구장도위(4.1±0.5)cm、수술시간위(119.3±25.8)min、술중출혈량위(193.3±14.6)mL,요통VAS평분、퇴통VAS평분술전위(4.98±0.65)분화(7.21±0.34)분,말차수방위(0.90±0.69)분화(1.41±0.28)분,여술전비교차이균유통계학의의(P<0.05);JOA평분술전위(13.8±4.4)분,말차수방위(24.1±2.8)분,여술전비교차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론:해법절구소,술중출혈소,술후요배통완해쾌,시요추번수적일충가행방법。
Objective:To study the clinical effects of unilateral vertebral pedicle screw fixation from paraspinal muscle ap-proach plus modified transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) on lumbar revision surgery. Methods:Retrospective analysis of the datas of 26 patients who were undergone above surgery methods from March 2008 to May 2010 were done. Clinical outcomes were assessed by VAS score system and JOA score system. Results:The length of the surgical incision, operation time and intra-operative blood loss were(4.1±0.5)cm,(119.3±25.8)min and(193.3±14.6)mL respectively. Preop-erative VAS scores on pain of low back and leg were(4.98±0.65)score and(7.21±0.34)score,while those were(0.90±0.69) score and(1.41±0.28)score at final follow-up. Preoperative JOA score and JOA score of last follow-up were(13.8±4.4)score and(24.1±2.8)score. There were statistically significant differences between preoperative scores and scores of final follow-up (P<0.05). Conclusions:Surgical method used in this experiment is reliable and effective for lumbar revision surgery with smaller surgical incision,less intra-operative blood loss.Pain of low back and leg was relieved quickly after operation.