化学反应工程与工艺
化學反應工程與工藝
화학반응공정여공예
CHEMICAL REACTION ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY
2014年
1期
91-96
,共6页
李雨佳%王雪%朱廷钰%魏耀东%宋斗
李雨佳%王雪%硃廷鈺%魏耀東%宋鬥
리우가%왕설%주정옥%위요동%송두
脱硫反应器%数值模拟%双流体模型%气固两相流%曳力模型
脫硫反應器%數值模擬%雙流體模型%氣固兩相流%抴力模型
탈류반응기%수치모의%쌍류체모형%기고량상류%예력모형
desulfurization reactor%numerical simulation%two fluid model%gas-solid two-phase flow%drag model
为加深对循环流化床脱硫反应器的流动特性的认识,本研究采用双流体模型,耦合非均匀曳力模型和颗粒动力学理论,使用非均匀的修正的Syamlal O¢Brien曳力模型考虑颗粒团聚现象对气固流动的影响,对循环流化床脱硫反应器中的流体力学特性进行了数值模拟。模拟得到的时均颗粒浓度和压降值与实验数据具有较好的一致性,验证了模拟方法的可靠性。颗粒速度的时间序列和概率分布函数显示,在反应器壁面附近区域均存在颗粒的向上、向下运动,在床层内颗粒总体上向上运动,同时还存在微观的内循环运动。模拟结果为颗粒速度的径向非均一分布提供了合理的解释,较Gidaspow模型有更好的适用性。
為加深對循環流化床脫硫反應器的流動特性的認識,本研究採用雙流體模型,耦閤非均勻抴力模型和顆粒動力學理論,使用非均勻的脩正的Syamlal O¢Brien抴力模型攷慮顆粒糰聚現象對氣固流動的影響,對循環流化床脫硫反應器中的流體力學特性進行瞭數值模擬。模擬得到的時均顆粒濃度和壓降值與實驗數據具有較好的一緻性,驗證瞭模擬方法的可靠性。顆粒速度的時間序列和概率分佈函數顯示,在反應器壁麵附近區域均存在顆粒的嚮上、嚮下運動,在床層內顆粒總體上嚮上運動,同時還存在微觀的內循環運動。模擬結果為顆粒速度的徑嚮非均一分佈提供瞭閤理的解釋,較Gidaspow模型有更好的適用性。
위가심대순배류화상탈류반응기적류동특성적인식,본연구채용쌍류체모형,우합비균균예력모형화과립동역학이론,사용비균균적수정적Syamlal O¢Brien예력모형고필과립단취현상대기고류동적영향,대순배류화상탈류반응기중적류체역학특성진행료수치모의。모의득도적시균과립농도화압강치여실험수거구유교호적일치성,험증료모의방법적가고성。과립속도적시간서렬화개솔분포함수현시,재반응기벽면부근구역균존재과립적향상、향하운동,재상층내과립총체상향상운동,동시환존재미관적내순배운동。모의결과위과립속도적경향비균일분포제공료합리적해석,교Gidaspow모형유경호적괄용성。
The hydrodynamics of gas-solid flow in a circulating fluidized bed desulfurization reactor was simulated by using two-fluid model and granular kinetics theory. The gas-solid inter-phase drag force is simulated by the Syamlal O’Brien drag model considering the particles clusters. The simulated time-averaged particle concentration and pressure drop agreed well with experimental data, which verified the feasibility of the simulation method. The instantaneous particle velocities and their probability density functions showed that the particles moved upward and downward near the wall. In general most particles moved upward in the CFB, while the microcosmic internally circulating flow of particles existed simultaneously The instantaneous particle velocity profiles offered an interpretation for the non-uniform distribution of time-averaged particle velocity, which proved that the OS drag model was better than Gidaspow drag model in the simulation of CFB.