中国卫生经济
中國衛生經濟
중국위생경제
CHINESE HEALTH ECONOMICS
2014年
2期
14-17
,共4页
翟铁民%柴培培%魏强%郭锋%王从从%张毓辉%万泉%赵郁馨
翟鐵民%柴培培%魏彊%郭鋒%王從從%張毓輝%萬泉%趙鬱馨
적철민%시배배%위강%곽봉%왕종종%장육휘%만천%조욱형
中国%慢性非传染性疾病%防治费用%卫生筹资
中國%慢性非傳染性疾病%防治費用%衛生籌資
중국%만성비전염성질병%방치비용%위생주자
China%non-communicable diseases%expenditure on prevention and treatment%health financing
目的:通过核算我国慢性非传染性疾病(以下简称慢性病)防治费用,分析中国慢性病防治筹资现状、存在的主要问题以及主要成因。方法:通过对4个省份慢性病防治服务提供、服务消耗以及服务的筹资情况进行调查,结合全国卫生服务调查数据,利用SHA2011核算体系从资金筹集、服务提供和功能使用角度对我国慢性病防治费用进行核算。结果:慢性病防治消耗大量卫生资源,占卫生总费用比重达到近70.00%,预防服务费用仅占全部慢性病费用的1.26%。心脑血管疾病费用所占比重达34.00%,医疗保险补偿水平不高,居民经济负担沉重。结论:医疗保障制度缺乏对慢性病针对性的设计,地方政府承担更多筹资压力,慢性病防治筹资的充足和稳定性受到影响。
目的:通過覈算我國慢性非傳染性疾病(以下簡稱慢性病)防治費用,分析中國慢性病防治籌資現狀、存在的主要問題以及主要成因。方法:通過對4箇省份慢性病防治服務提供、服務消耗以及服務的籌資情況進行調查,結閤全國衛生服務調查數據,利用SHA2011覈算體繫從資金籌集、服務提供和功能使用角度對我國慢性病防治費用進行覈算。結果:慢性病防治消耗大量衛生資源,佔衛生總費用比重達到近70.00%,預防服務費用僅佔全部慢性病費用的1.26%。心腦血管疾病費用所佔比重達34.00%,醫療保險補償水平不高,居民經濟負擔沉重。結論:醫療保障製度缺乏對慢性病針對性的設計,地方政府承擔更多籌資壓力,慢性病防治籌資的充足和穩定性受到影響。
목적:통과핵산아국만성비전염성질병(이하간칭만성병)방치비용,분석중국만성병방치주자현상、존재적주요문제이급주요성인。방법:통과대4개성빈만성병방치복무제공、복무소모이급복무적주자정황진행조사,결합전국위생복무조사수거,이용SHA2011핵산체계종자금주집、복무제공화공능사용각도대아국만성병방치비용진행핵산。결과:만성병방치소모대량위생자원,점위생총비용비중체도근70.00%,예방복무비용부점전부만성병비용적1.26%。심뇌혈관질병비용소점비중체34.00%,의료보험보상수평불고,거민경제부담침중。결론:의료보장제도결핍대만성병침대성적설계,지방정부승담경다주자압력,만성병방치주자적충족화은정성수도영향。
Objective: To analyze the financing status and main issues of Non-Communicable Diseases ( NCDs ) prevention and treatment by estimating China NCDs expenditure on prevention and treatment. Methods: Using the data from field surveys conducted in 4 provinces and National Household Health Survey data to estimate the consuming status of health services and goods, who provided and what schemes paid for the health services and goods under the framework of System of Health Account 2011. Results: Most of the health resources were consumed by NCDs treatment and prevention, expenditure on NCDs accounted for nearly 70.00% of the total health expenditure, but the expenditure on NCDs prevention only accounted for 1.26%of the total expenditure on NCDs. Expenditure on cardiovascular disease accounted for 34.00%. The reimbursement levels of insurance schemes are relative lower and the residents with NCDs are facing heavy economic burden. Conclusion: Social health insurance schemes lack pointed reimbursement policy for NCDs, local government assume more responsibility of health financing which is detrimental to the sufficiency and stability of NCDs financing.