中国医疗设备
中國醫療設備
중국의료설비
CHINA MEDICAL EQUIPMENT
2014年
2期
161-163
,共3页
邓凯%王文文%张成琪%王广丽%李伟%庞涛%王新怡%史浩
鄧凱%王文文%張成琪%王廣麗%李偉%龐濤%王新怡%史浩
산개%왕문문%장성기%왕엄려%리위%방도%왕신이%사호
磁共振成像%扩散加权成像%子宫内膜病变%表观扩散系数%子宫内膜癌
磁共振成像%擴散加權成像%子宮內膜病變%錶觀擴散繫數%子宮內膜癌
자공진성상%확산가권성상%자궁내막병변%표관확산계수%자궁내막암
magnetic resonance imaging%diffusion-weighted imaging%uterine endometrial lesions%apparent diffusion coefifcient%uterine endometrial carcinoma
目的:探讨磁共振扩散加权成像(DWI)在子宫内膜病变中的临床应用价值,通过对表观扩散系数(ADC)值的分析,对子宫内膜良恶性病变进行鉴别。方法对30例经病理证实的子宫内膜病变患者进行常规MRI(磁共振成像)扫描及DWI扫描。其中子宫内膜癌18例,子宫内膜良性病变12例,分别测量病灶的ADC值,并进行对比分析。结果子宫内膜癌和子宫内膜良性病变的ADC值分别为(0.88±0.11)×10-3mm2/s 和(1.19±0.13)×10-3mm2/s ,两者相比具有统计学差异(P<0.01);以1.00×10-3mm2/s作为诊断子宫内膜良恶性病变的阈值,其敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为88.9%、100%和93.3%。结论 DWI中,通过ADC值的测量能够初步鉴别子宫内膜良恶性病变。
目的:探討磁共振擴散加權成像(DWI)在子宮內膜病變中的臨床應用價值,通過對錶觀擴散繫數(ADC)值的分析,對子宮內膜良噁性病變進行鑒彆。方法對30例經病理證實的子宮內膜病變患者進行常規MRI(磁共振成像)掃描及DWI掃描。其中子宮內膜癌18例,子宮內膜良性病變12例,分彆測量病竈的ADC值,併進行對比分析。結果子宮內膜癌和子宮內膜良性病變的ADC值分彆為(0.88±0.11)×10-3mm2/s 和(1.19±0.13)×10-3mm2/s ,兩者相比具有統計學差異(P<0.01);以1.00×10-3mm2/s作為診斷子宮內膜良噁性病變的閾值,其敏感性、特異性和準確性分彆為88.9%、100%和93.3%。結論 DWI中,通過ADC值的測量能夠初步鑒彆子宮內膜良噁性病變。
목적:탐토자공진확산가권성상(DWI)재자궁내막병변중적림상응용개치,통과대표관확산계수(ADC)치적분석,대자궁내막량악성병변진행감별。방법대30례경병리증실적자궁내막병변환자진행상규MRI(자공진성상)소묘급DWI소묘。기중자궁내막암18례,자궁내막량성병변12례,분별측량병조적ADC치,병진행대비분석。결과자궁내막암화자궁내막량성병변적ADC치분별위(0.88±0.11)×10-3mm2/s 화(1.19±0.13)×10-3mm2/s ,량자상비구유통계학차이(P<0.01);이1.00×10-3mm2/s작위진단자궁내막량악성병변적역치,기민감성、특이성화준학성분별위88.9%、100%화93.3%。결론 DWI중,통과ADC치적측량능구초보감별자궁내막량악성병변。
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of DW MRI (Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging) in differential diagnosis of uterine endometrial lesions through analysis of the ADC (Apparent Diffusion Coefifcient) value. Methods Among 30 pathologically-conifrmed uterine endometrial lesion patients undergoing conventional MRI and DWI (Diffusion Weighted Imaging), there were 18 cases of uterine endometrial carcinoma and 12 benign endometrial lesions. Based on the ADC values measured in all the lesions, comparisons were made respectively. Results The ADC value of uterine endometrial carcinoma was (0.88±0.11)×10-3mm2/s versus benign endometrial lesions’ (1.19±0.13)×10-3mm2/s with statistical difference (P<0.01) between them. When 1.00×10-3mm2/s was taken as the threshold for differential diagnosis of benign (>1.00×10-3mm2/s) and malignant (<1.00×10-3mm2/s) uterine endometrial lesions, the sensitivity, speciifcity and accuracy of malignant uterine endometrial lesions were 88.9%, 100% and 93.3% respectively. Conclusion ADC measurement in DWI allowed for preliminary differentiate diagnosis of uterine endometrial lesions.