医药前沿
醫藥前沿
의약전연
YIAYAO QIANYAN
2014年
2期
91-92
,共2页
远隔缺血后处理%缺血/再灌注损伤%海马CA1区
遠隔缺血後處理%缺血/再灌註損傷%海馬CA1區
원격결혈후처리%결혈/재관주손상%해마CA1구
remote ischemic postconditioning%ischemia-reperfusion%hippocampus gyrus CA1 area
目的:初步探讨肢体缺血后处理对脑缺血/再灌注损伤的影响,验证小鼠前脑缺血再灌注损伤模型开展相关研究的可行性。方法30只小鼠随机分为3组:假手术组(A组),缺血60 min组(B组),缺血60 min +后处理组(C组)。用双颈总动脉阻断法建立小鼠前脑缺血/再灌注损伤模型,以可复性阻断小鼠双侧股动脉作为干预措施。实验小鼠再灌注24 h后取脑,记数海马CA1区的存活细胞数、变性细胞率。结果海马CA1区细胞存活数,A组> C组> B组(P <0.01);细胞变性率,B组、C组都大于A组(P <0.05),但B组和 C组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论肢体缺血后处理可减轻脑缺血/再灌注损伤;小鼠前脑缺血再灌注损伤模型可作为开展相关研究的平台。
目的:初步探討肢體缺血後處理對腦缺血/再灌註損傷的影響,驗證小鼠前腦缺血再灌註損傷模型開展相關研究的可行性。方法30隻小鼠隨機分為3組:假手術組(A組),缺血60 min組(B組),缺血60 min +後處理組(C組)。用雙頸總動脈阻斷法建立小鼠前腦缺血/再灌註損傷模型,以可複性阻斷小鼠雙側股動脈作為榦預措施。實驗小鼠再灌註24 h後取腦,記數海馬CA1區的存活細胞數、變性細胞率。結果海馬CA1區細胞存活數,A組> C組> B組(P <0.01);細胞變性率,B組、C組都大于A組(P <0.05),但B組和 C組比較差異無統計學意義(P>0.05)。結論肢體缺血後處理可減輕腦缺血/再灌註損傷;小鼠前腦缺血再灌註損傷模型可作為開展相關研究的平檯。
목적:초보탐토지체결혈후처리대뇌결혈/재관주손상적영향,험증소서전뇌결혈재관주손상모형개전상관연구적가행성。방법30지소서수궤분위3조:가수술조(A조),결혈60 min조(B조),결혈60 min +후처리조(C조)。용쌍경총동맥조단법건립소서전뇌결혈/재관주손상모형,이가복성조단소서쌍측고동맥작위간예조시。실험소서재관주24 h후취뇌,기수해마CA1구적존활세포수、변성세포솔。결과해마CA1구세포존활수,A조> C조> B조(P <0.01);세포변성솔,B조、C조도대우A조(P <0.05),단B조화 C조비교차이무통계학의의(P>0.05)。결론지체결혈후처리가감경뇌결혈/재관주손상;소서전뇌결혈재관주손상모형가작위개전상관연구적평태。
Objective To investigate effects of remote ischemic postconditioning on forebrain ischemia-reperfusion injury in mice and establish a animal model for related experiments. Methods Thirty mice were randomly divided into 3 groups: sham operation group (A), ischemia for 60 min group (B), RIPC group (C). The mouse model of forebrain ischemia-reperfusion was established by blocking bilateral common carotid arteries. RIPC group received 3 cycles of 5 min reperfusion fol owed by 5 min ischemia in bilateral femoral arteries at the beginning of cerebral reperfusion. After 24h reperfusion, Comparison of the number of viable celland denatured cellrates in hippocampus gyrus CA1 area between 3 groups. Results Comparison of the number of viable cell, group A > group C> group B(P < 0.01). Compared with group A, denatured cellrates of group B and C are higher(P < 0.05). In addition, there is no significant difference between group B and C (P > 0.05). Conclusion RIPC could protect brain against forebrain ischemia-reperfusion induced injury. The mouse model of 60 min ischemia and 24h reperfusion is suitable for experiments concerning ischemia-reperfusion or RIPC.