CAJ | 학술논문

目的：观察比较不同时间采集尿标本对尿沉渣检验结果的影响。方法根据患者自愿原则选取我院门诊、住院的患者96例，对每例患者均采集晨尿和第二次晨尿两份样本进行尿沉渣分析检验。对尿沉渣检验结果进行比较分析。结果尿沉渣检验指标显示，白细胞、上皮细胞比较，第二次晨尿阳性例数明显高于晨尿，而变形红细胞、红细胞计数比较，第二次晨尿阳性例数明显低于晨尿，差异显著（P<0.05），具有统计学意义。结论第二次晨尿不影响尿沉渣检验结果的准确性，还可以提高某些指标的阳性率，建议用于替代晨尿作为尿检标本。
목적：관찰비교불동시간채집뇨표본대뇨침사검험결과적영향。방법근거환자자원원칙선취아원문진、주원적환자96례，대매례환자균채집신뇨화제이차신뇨량빈양본진행뇨침사분석검험。대뇨침사검험결과진행비교분석。결과뇨침사검험지표현시，백세포、상피세포비교，제이차신뇨양성례수명현고우신뇨，이변형홍세포、홍세포계수비교，제이차신뇨양성례수명현저우신뇨，차이현저（P<0.05），구유통계학의의。결론제이차신뇨불영향뇨침사검험결과적준학성，환가이제고모사지표적양성솔，건의용우체대신뇨작위뇨검표본。
Objective: To observe and compare the impacts of different col ection time of urine specimens on test results of urinary sediments. Method: 96 patients from outpatient and inpatient departments were chosen according to the principle of voluntariness. Everyone of patients were col ected two specimens of morning urine and the second morning urine to conduct analysises and tests of urinary sediments. Test results of urinary sediments were compared and analyzed. Result: Test results of urinary sediments showed that, on WBCs and epithelial cells, positive cases of the second morning urine were obviously more than morning urine, but on deformed RBCs and RBC counts, positive cases of the second morning urine were obviously less than morning urine (P<0.05). Conclusion: The second morning urine does not affect the accuracy of test result of urinary sediment, but can improve positive rates of some indicators. So we suggest that it adopted as urine specimen instead of morning urine.