CAJ | 학술논문

目的：探讨腹腔镜手术和开腹手术治疗宫外孕的效果，以供参考。方法选择2011年8月～2013年7月我院宫外孕患者94例作为研究对象，随机分组。A组接受开腹手术治疗，B组接受腹腔镜手术治疗。对比两组患者手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间的差异性。结果与A组比较发现，B组患者术中出血量较少，住院时间较短，差异具有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。对比两组手术时间发现，两组间差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。结论腹腔镜手术治疗宫外孕疗效满意，具有创伤小、恢复快等优点，值得在临床推广应用。
목적：탐토복강경수술화개복수술치료궁외잉적효과，이공삼고。방법선택2011년8월～2013년7월아원궁외잉환자94례작위연구대상，수궤분조。A조접수개복수술치료，B조접수복강경수술치료。대비량조환자수술시간、술중출혈량、주원시간적차이성。결과여A조비교발현，B조환자술중출혈량교소，주원시간교단，차이구유통계학의의（P＜0.05）。대비량조수술시간발현，량조간차이무통계학의의（P＞0.05）。결론복강경수술치료궁외잉료효만의，구유창상소、회복쾌등우점，치득재림상추엄응용。
Objective To discuss the therapeutic effect of laparoscopy and laparotomy in the treatment of ectopic pregnancy. Methods 94 patients with the ectopic pregnancy treated in this hospital from August 2011 to July 2013 were randomly divided into two groups. Patients in group A received the laparotomy, while patients in group B received laparoscopy. Their operation time, intraoperative hematoma volume and hospitalization time were compared and analyzed. Results Compared with group A, patients in group B had less hematoma volume and shorter hospitalization time, with the statistical difference(P < 0.05). There was no statistical difference in the operation time of two groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion The laparoscopy has advantages of satisfactory therapeutic effect, little operation trauma and rapid recovery, which is worthy to be popularized in the clinical practice.