CAJ | 학술논문

挂竿、烟夹、散叶等3种装烟方式的烘烤对比试验表明：与传统挂竿烘烤相比，较散叶烘烤省工、节能，挂竿装烟和针式烟夹装烟环节用工效率基本一致，差异不明显，但编烟环节针式烟夹明显省工，总体节省了0．39个工/667 m2；散叶堆积较挂竿的各个环节均明显省工，散叶堆积较挂竿节省了1．60个工/667 m2，较针式烟夹节省用工1．21个工/667 m2。针式烟夹和散叶堆积较挂竿烘烤能耗成本略有降低，散叶堆积干烟较挂竿节省能耗成本0．22元/kg，针式烟夹干烟节省0．07元/kg。烟夹烤后烟叶的化学成分协调性最好；烟叶均价以及中上等烟比例针式烟夹和散叶堆积均较好，针式烟夹和散叶堆积干烟均价较挂竿分别高0．9和0．5元/kg。
괘간、연협、산협등3충장연방식적홍고대비시험표명：여전통괘간홍고상비，교산협홍고성공、절능，괘간장연화침식연협장연배절용공효솔기본일치，차이불명현，단편연배절침식연협명현성공，총체절성료0．39개공/667 m2；산협퇴적교괘간적각개배절균명현성공，산협퇴적교괘간절성료1．60개공/667 m2，교침식연협절성용공1．21개공/667 m2。침식연협화산협퇴적교괘간홍고능모성본략유강저，산협퇴적간연교괘간절성능모성본0．22원/kg，침식연협간연절성0．07원/kg。연협고후연협적화학성분협조성최호；연협균개이급중상등연비례침식연협화산협퇴적균교호，침식연협화산협퇴적간연균개교괘간분별고0．9화0．5원/kg。
The comparative tests for the baked effect of flue -cured tobacco loaded by 3 different ways ( hanging rod , tobacco clamping, and dispersal leaf ) were carried out in bulk curing barn .The results indicated that: in comparison with the traditional hanging-rod baking , the dispersal-leaf baking could save labor and energy .The labor efficiency in tobacco -loading of hanging -rod way was basically the same as that of needle -type tobacco-clamping way , but the labor used in tobacco -weaving of the for-mer was 0.39 workers/667 m2 higher than that of the latter .The labor used in all links of dispersal -leaf way was 1.60 workers/667 m2 less than that of hanging -rod way, and 1.21 workers/667 m2 less than that of needle -type tobacco-clamping way.The energy-consumption cost in tobacco -baking of dispersal -leaf way and needle -type tobacco-clamping way was respectively 0.22 and 0.07 yuan/kg lower than that of hanging -rod way.The chemical compositions in the baked tobacco leaves loaded by tobacco -clamping way had the best harmony .The average price of baked dry tobacco leaves of needle -type tobacco-clamping way and dis-persal-leaf way was respectively 0.9 and 0.5 yuan/kg higher than that of hanging -rod way, and the medium-superior proportion of baked tobacco leaves of these two tobacco -loading ways was also higher than that of hanging -rod way .