中国医学创新
中國醫學創新
중국의학창신
MEDICAL INNOVATION OF CHINA
2014年
8期
26-28
,共3页
稳定性心绞痛%尼可地尔%效果观察
穩定性心絞痛%尼可地爾%效果觀察
은정성심교통%니가지이%효과관찰
Stable angina%Nicole%Effect observation
目的：探讨尼可地尔治疗稳定性心绞痛的临床治疗效果。方法：选择2011年1月-2012年1月本院收治的稳定性心绞痛患者72例，按随机数字表法分为治疗组和对照组，每组36例。所有患者均给予阿托伐他汀钙、阿司匹林、硝酸酯类药物以及β-受体阻滞剂等常规治疗。治疗组在此基础上加用尼可地尔进行治疗，对两组的临床治疗效果进行对比分析。结果：对照组18例显效，12例有效，总有效率83.33%；治疗组29例显效，6例有效，总有效率97.22%。两组临床治疗效果比较差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。治疗组有2例出现头晕、呕吐等不良反应，对照组则有7例，两组不良反应情况比较差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。治疗组西雅图心绞痛量表的各项数据都要优于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论：采用尼可地尔治疗稳定性心绞痛具有显著效果，其具有治疗效果好、并发症发生率低、安全性较高等优点，与常规治疗相比具有显著优越性，值得临床推广。
目的：探討尼可地爾治療穩定性心絞痛的臨床治療效果。方法：選擇2011年1月-2012年1月本院收治的穩定性心絞痛患者72例，按隨機數字錶法分為治療組和對照組，每組36例。所有患者均給予阿託伐他汀鈣、阿司匹林、硝痠酯類藥物以及β-受體阻滯劑等常規治療。治療組在此基礎上加用尼可地爾進行治療，對兩組的臨床治療效果進行對比分析。結果：對照組18例顯效，12例有效，總有效率83.33%；治療組29例顯效，6例有效，總有效率97.22%。兩組臨床治療效果比較差異有統計學意義（P<0.05）。治療組有2例齣現頭暈、嘔吐等不良反應，對照組則有7例，兩組不良反應情況比較差異有統計學意義（P<0.05）。治療組西雅圖心絞痛量錶的各項數據都要優于對照組，差異有統計學意義（P<0.05）。結論：採用尼可地爾治療穩定性心絞痛具有顯著效果，其具有治療效果好、併髮癥髮生率低、安全性較高等優點，與常規治療相比具有顯著優越性，值得臨床推廣。
목적：탐토니가지이치료은정성심교통적림상치료효과。방법：선택2011년1월-2012년1월본원수치적은정성심교통환자72례，안수궤수자표법분위치료조화대조조，매조36례。소유환자균급여아탁벌타정개、아사필림、초산지류약물이급β-수체조체제등상규치료。치료조재차기출상가용니가지이진행치료，대량조적림상치료효과진행대비분석。결과：대조조18례현효，12례유효，총유효솔83.33%；치료조29례현효，6례유효，총유효솔97.22%。량조림상치료효과비교차이유통계학의의（P<0.05）。치료조유2례출현두훈、구토등불량반응，대조조칙유7례，량조불량반응정황비교차이유통계학의의（P<0.05）。치료조서아도심교통량표적각항수거도요우우대조조，차이유통계학의의（P<0.05）。결론：채용니가지이치료은정성심교통구유현저효과，기구유치료효과호、병발증발생솔저、안전성교고등우점，여상규치료상비구유현저우월성，치득림상추엄。
Objective:To study the clinical effect of nicole in the treatment of stable angina. Method:72 patients with stable angina received in our hospital from January 2011 to January 2012 were divided into the two groups according to random number table method,and there were 36 patients in each group,and all patients received the conventional treatment, including atorvastatin calcium,aspirin,nitrates and beta blockers and so on. the treatment group were treated with nicole on the basis of the conventional treatment,and the clinical therapeutic effects of the two groups were compared and analyzed. Result:In the control group,18 cases were excellently,and 12 cases were effectively,and the effective rate was 83.33%. In the treatment group,29 cases were excellently,and 6 cases were effectively,and the effective rate was 97.22%. The effective rates of the two groups were compared,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). The treatment group had 2 patients appeared dizziness,vomiting and other adverse reactions,the control group had 7 patients,and the incidence of adverse reactions of the two groups were compared,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). Various data in Seattle angina table of the treatment group were superior to that of the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). Conclusion:Nicole has a significant effect in the treatment of stable angina,and this kind of treatment method has advantage as the good treatment effect,the low complication rate,the high security,and compared with other treatment method it has significant advantages and is worthy of popularizing in the clinical.
