天津法学
天津法學
천진법학
JOURNAL OF TIANJIN ADMINISTRATIVE INSTITUTE OF POLITICAL SCIENCE & LAW
2014年
1期
11-17
,共7页
量刑%民意%正当性%判断
量刑%民意%正噹性%判斷
양형%민의%정당성%판단
measurement of penalty%public opinions%justification%judgments
近些年来,随着大众传媒的发达,某些刑事案件由于媒体的报道迅速成为社会热点问题,从而形成舆论影响司法审判的印象。然而,无论是通过社会舆论表现出来的“民情”还是“民愤”,都是法官在量刑过程中应当考虑的民意。文章通过逻辑分析和实证研究的方法,从法理和司法实践的角度阐明了民意作为量刑依据的正当性,提出这种民意应当是普通民众在充分了解案情的前提下根据朴素的正义观念、善恶标准和道德情感对被告人应当如何接受刑事惩罚所形成的意见。文章提出,合理的民意应当具备三个方面特征:为“公益”而非“私益”;为“公意”而非“众意”;为“常情”而非“矫情”。
近些年來,隨著大衆傳媒的髮達,某些刑事案件由于媒體的報道迅速成為社會熱點問題,從而形成輿論影響司法審判的印象。然而,無論是通過社會輿論錶現齣來的“民情”還是“民憤”,都是法官在量刑過程中應噹攷慮的民意。文章通過邏輯分析和實證研究的方法,從法理和司法實踐的角度闡明瞭民意作為量刑依據的正噹性,提齣這種民意應噹是普通民衆在充分瞭解案情的前提下根據樸素的正義觀唸、善噁標準和道德情感對被告人應噹如何接受刑事懲罰所形成的意見。文章提齣,閤理的民意應噹具備三箇方麵特徵:為“公益”而非“私益”;為“公意”而非“衆意”;為“常情”而非“矯情”。
근사년래,수착대음전매적발체,모사형사안건유우매체적보도신속성위사회열점문제,종이형성여론영향사법심판적인상。연이,무론시통과사회여론표현출래적“민정”환시“민분”,도시법관재양형과정중응당고필적민의。문장통과라집분석화실증연구적방법,종법리화사법실천적각도천명료민의작위양형의거적정당성,제출저충민의응당시보통민음재충분료해안정적전제하근거박소적정의관념、선악표준화도덕정감대피고인응당여하접수형사징벌소형성적의견。문장제출,합리적민의응당구비삼개방면특정:위“공익”이비“사익”;위“공의”이비“음의”;위“상정”이비“교정”。
In recent years, some criminal cases became hot social issues due to the media coverage to form the impression that public opinions can affect the justice. However, whether the"public sympathy"or the"public anger"is the public opinion should be considered by judges in measurement of penalty. The authors clarify the legitimacy of public opinion as a basis for sentencing from the perspective of jurisprudence and judicial prac-tice by methods of logical analysis and empirical research. The conclusion is that public opinions in measure-ment of penalty should be ordinary people's views on how to punish the criminal defendant in accordance with the concept of justice, standards of good and evil, and moral feelings on the premise of fully understanding of the case. The authors propose that reasonable public opinions should have three characteristics:the"public good"rather than"private interest";as"general will"rather than"public opinion";as"common sense"rather than"hypocritical sense".