CAJ | 학술논문

权力是国际政治的一个永恒话题，然而，国际关系学对权力的研究缺乏空间维度。考虑空间距离、地缘环境（由地理环境、地缘关系和地缘结构3部分组成）等对权力的空间制约，权力在空间的不均衡分布就是地缘位势。据此理解，文章从权力的4个来源，即军事实力、经济实力、软实力和不平等相互依赖，并结合地理衰减原理构建了地缘位势评价方法。以中日钓鱼岛之争为例，定量评价了中日两国在钓鱼岛的地缘位势，结果表明：随着中国崛起，整体经济实力、军事实力和中日之间不平等相互依赖关系的转变，至2010年中国在钓鱼岛的地缘位势已经全面超越日本。这一评价结果既可以回应国人在钓鱼岛问题上的不同声音，同时也阐释了自2012年以来中国在钓鱼岛问题上积极的处理方式。
권력시국제정치적일개영항화제，연이，국제관계학대권력적연구결핍공간유도。고필공간거리、지연배경（유지리배경、지연관계화지연결구3부분조성）등대권력적공간제약，권력재공간적불균형분포취시지연위세。거차리해，문장종권력적4개래원，즉군사실력、경제실력、연실력화불평등상호의뢰，병결합지리쇠감원리구건료지연위세평개방법。이중일조어도지쟁위례，정량평개료중일량국재조어도적지연위세，결과표명：수착중국굴기，정체경제실력、군사실력화중일지간불평등상호의뢰관계적전변，지2010년중국재조어도적지연위세이경전면초월일본。저일평개결과기가이회응국인재조어도문제상적불동성음，동시야천석료자2012년이래중국재조어도문제상적겁적처리방식。
Power is an eternal topic of international politics, is the root causes of conflict and cooperation. The Science of International Relations discusses the sources of state power embodied in realism and neo-liberal institutionalism. However, the study on power lacks spatial dimension. Considering the restriction of spatial distance and Geo-Setting (which is composed of geographical environment, Geo-Relationship and Geo-Structure) on the space of power, this paper regards Geo-Potential as the disequilibrium distribution of power in space. Combining the geographical attenuation theory, the paper constructs a Geo-Potential evaluation method from the four sources of power, which are military strength, economic strength, soft power and inequality interdependence. Taking the dispute about the Diaoyu Islands over China and Japan as an example, with the method, the paper quantitatively evaluates the Geo-Potential of the two nations. The results show that:with the rise of China and the transition of the overall economic strength, military strength, and unequal interdependence relationship between China and Japan, till 2010 China’s Geo-Potential on the Diaoyu Islands had surpassed Japan’s. The Geo-Potential change between China and Japan on the Diaoyu Islands has three interrelated reasons: the first is China’s rapid economic development, the second is the obvious improvement of the military strength of China, and the third is the shift of the unequal interdependence between China and Japan. The results of this evaluation can respond to different voices in China on the Diaoyu Islands issue, and it also can explain the active and tough approach of China to deal with this issue since 2012.