CAJ | 학술논문

香港和深圳的法定图则在制度建构、管控方法及实施程序上都存在明显差别。研究从成果构成、编制内容、审批管理和行政许可等方面对两地的法定图则制度进行比较研究，剖析法定图则背后的编制思维和管理理念的差异。香港法定图则具有较强的公共政策属性，在市场经济中彰显“有限理性”，强调程序合理与有限管理；深圳法定图则基于“完全理性”思维，强调规划确定性，突出全面管控。随着社会转型的深入和利益诉求的多元化，受限于技术和制度短板，深圳的“最优”方案往往只是“理想蓝图”，需要对其制度进行优化和完善。
향항화심수적법정도칙재제도건구、관공방법급실시정서상도존재명현차별。연구종성과구성、편제내용、심비관리화행정허가등방면대량지적법정도칙제도진행비교연구，부석법정도칙배후적편제사유화관리이념적차이。향항법정도칙구유교강적공공정책속성，재시장경제중창현“유한이성”，강조정서합리여유한관리；심수법정도칙기우“완전이성”사유，강조규화학정성，돌출전면관공。수착사회전형적심입화이익소구적다원화，수한우기술화제도단판，심수적“최우”방안왕왕지시“이상람도”，수요대기제도진행우화화완선。
Statutory charts inHong Kong and Shenzhen are dif erent in system building, governance methods, and implementation procedures. The paper studies the products, contents, inspection and approval, and administrative permission of the two, analyzes their conceptual and management backdrop. Hong Kong statutory charts are limited rationality in market economy, and highlights procedure right. Shenzhen charts stresses planning certainty and complete governance. With social transition and multiple stakeholders involvement in urban planning, Shenzhen ideal blueprint plan needs reform and improvement.