目的 比较降钙素原(PCT)、C-反应蛋白(CRP)、内毒素等炎症因子在细菌性血流感染所致脓毒症患者中的水平差异及其早期诊断价值.方法 回顾性分析2012年2月至2013年5月入住首都医科大学附属北京世纪坛医院重症监护病房(ICU)确诊为脓毒症且血培养阳性的132例患者的临床资料,根据血培养结果将脓毒症患者分为革兰阴性(G-)杆菌血流感染组(98例)和革兰阳性(G+)球菌血流感染组(34例),比较两组患者6h内的炎症因子,如白细胞计数(WBC)、中性粒细胞比例(N)、CRP、PCT、内毒素水平等的差异及其之间的相关性;绘制各炎症因子对血流感染所致脓毒症诊断的受试者工作特征曲线(ROC曲线),根据曲线下面积(AUC)来评价其对血流感染所致脓毒症的诊断价值,根据最佳诊断临界值评估各数值对血流感染诊断的敏感性和特异性.结果 ①G-菌组PCT、CRP、内毒素水平明显高于G+菌组[PCT(μg/L):5.11(0.99,18.00)比1.00(0.36,2.73),Z=49.647,P=0.000; CRP(mg/L):111.5±57.4比75.9±56.6,t=9.947,P=0.000;内毒素(ng/L):18.00(8.75,28.00)比5.00(5.00,6.25),Z=52.333,P=0.000],而WBC、N差异无统计学意义.②相关性分析显示:G菌组患者PCT与CRP(r=0.671,P=0.000)、PCT与内毒素(r=0.916,P=0.000)、CRP与内毒素(r=0.687,P=0.004)均呈正相关;G+菌组患者PCT与CRP(r=0.620,P=0.000)、PCT与内毒素(r=0.487,P=0.010)、PCT与WBC(r=0.537,P=0.001)、PCT与N(r=0.432,P=0.011)、CRP与内毒素(r=0.674,P=0.000)、内毒素与WBC(r=0.197,P=0.024)均呈正相关;而所有细菌性血流感染患者PCT与CRP(r=0.538,P=0.000)、PCT与内毒素(r=0.740,P=0.000)、PCT与WBC (r=0.259,P=0.003)、CRP与内毒素(r=0.579,P=0.000)、内毒素与WBC(r=0.197,P=0.024)均呈正相关.③ROC曲线分析显示:在G-菌血流感染所致脓毒症患者,PCT的AUC为0.825,最佳诊断临界值>2.455 μg/L时敏感度71.4%、特异度96.2%; CRP的AUC为0.761,最佳诊断临界值>79.45 mg/L时敏感度64.3%、特异度80.8%;内毒素的AUC为0.797,最佳诊断临界值> 15.5 ng/L时敏感度61.2%、特异度94.2%.在G+菌血流感染所致脓毒症患者,PCT的AUC为0.619,最佳诊断临界值> 1.585 μg/L时敏感度41.2%、特异度82.7%;CRP的AUC为0.533,最佳诊断临界值>95.25 mg/L时敏感度32.4%、特异度82.7%.结论 G-菌血流感染所致脓毒症患者PCT、CRP、内毒素水平高于G+菌血流感染者,三者联合检测有望成为早期判断血流感染所致脓毒症及其病情严重程度的指标.
目的 比較降鈣素原(PCT)、C-反應蛋白(CRP)、內毒素等炎癥因子在細菌性血流感染所緻膿毒癥患者中的水平差異及其早期診斷價值.方法 迴顧性分析2012年2月至2013年5月入住首都醫科大學附屬北京世紀罈醫院重癥鑑護病房(ICU)確診為膿毒癥且血培養暘性的132例患者的臨床資料,根據血培養結果將膿毒癥患者分為革蘭陰性(G-)桿菌血流感染組(98例)和革蘭暘性(G+)毬菌血流感染組(34例),比較兩組患者6h內的炎癥因子,如白細胞計數(WBC)、中性粒細胞比例(N)、CRP、PCT、內毒素水平等的差異及其之間的相關性;繪製各炎癥因子對血流感染所緻膿毒癥診斷的受試者工作特徵麯線(ROC麯線),根據麯線下麵積(AUC)來評價其對血流感染所緻膿毒癥的診斷價值,根據最佳診斷臨界值評估各數值對血流感染診斷的敏感性和特異性.結果 ①G-菌組PCT、CRP、內毒素水平明顯高于G+菌組[PCT(μg/L):5.11(0.99,18.00)比1.00(0.36,2.73),Z=49.647,P=0.000; CRP(mg/L):111.5±57.4比75.9±56.6,t=9.947,P=0.000;內毒素(ng/L):18.00(8.75,28.00)比5.00(5.00,6.25),Z=52.333,P=0.000],而WBC、N差異無統計學意義.②相關性分析顯示:G菌組患者PCT與CRP(r=0.671,P=0.000)、PCT與內毒素(r=0.916,P=0.000)、CRP與內毒素(r=0.687,P=0.004)均呈正相關;G+菌組患者PCT與CRP(r=0.620,P=0.000)、PCT與內毒素(r=0.487,P=0.010)、PCT與WBC(r=0.537,P=0.001)、PCT與N(r=0.432,P=0.011)、CRP與內毒素(r=0.674,P=0.000)、內毒素與WBC(r=0.197,P=0.024)均呈正相關;而所有細菌性血流感染患者PCT與CRP(r=0.538,P=0.000)、PCT與內毒素(r=0.740,P=0.000)、PCT與WBC (r=0.259,P=0.003)、CRP與內毒素(r=0.579,P=0.000)、內毒素與WBC(r=0.197,P=0.024)均呈正相關.③ROC麯線分析顯示:在G-菌血流感染所緻膿毒癥患者,PCT的AUC為0.825,最佳診斷臨界值>2.455 μg/L時敏感度71.4%、特異度96.2%; CRP的AUC為0.761,最佳診斷臨界值>79.45 mg/L時敏感度64.3%、特異度80.8%;內毒素的AUC為0.797,最佳診斷臨界值> 15.5 ng/L時敏感度61.2%、特異度94.2%.在G+菌血流感染所緻膿毒癥患者,PCT的AUC為0.619,最佳診斷臨界值> 1.585 μg/L時敏感度41.2%、特異度82.7%;CRP的AUC為0.533,最佳診斷臨界值>95.25 mg/L時敏感度32.4%、特異度82.7%.結論 G-菌血流感染所緻膿毒癥患者PCT、CRP、內毒素水平高于G+菌血流感染者,三者聯閤檢測有望成為早期判斷血流感染所緻膿毒癥及其病情嚴重程度的指標.
목적 비교강개소원(PCT)、C-반응단백(CRP)、내독소등염증인자재세균성혈류감염소치농독증환자중적수평차이급기조기진단개치.방법 회고성분석2012년2월지2013년5월입주수도의과대학부속북경세기단의원중증감호병방(ICU)학진위농독증차혈배양양성적132례환자적림상자료,근거혈배양결과장농독증환자분위혁란음성(G-)간균혈류감염조(98례)화혁란양성(G+)구균혈류감염조(34례),비교량조환자6h내적염증인자,여백세포계수(WBC)、중성립세포비례(N)、CRP、PCT、내독소수평등적차이급기지간적상관성;회제각염증인자대혈류감염소치농독증진단적수시자공작특정곡선(ROC곡선),근거곡선하면적(AUC)래평개기대혈류감염소치농독증적진단개치,근거최가진단림계치평고각수치대혈류감염진단적민감성화특이성.결과 ①G-균조PCT、CRP、내독소수평명현고우G+균조[PCT(μg/L):5.11(0.99,18.00)비1.00(0.36,2.73),Z=49.647,P=0.000; CRP(mg/L):111.5±57.4비75.9±56.6,t=9.947,P=0.000;내독소(ng/L):18.00(8.75,28.00)비5.00(5.00,6.25),Z=52.333,P=0.000],이WBC、N차이무통계학의의.②상관성분석현시:G균조환자PCT여CRP(r=0.671,P=0.000)、PCT여내독소(r=0.916,P=0.000)、CRP여내독소(r=0.687,P=0.004)균정정상관;G+균조환자PCT여CRP(r=0.620,P=0.000)、PCT여내독소(r=0.487,P=0.010)、PCT여WBC(r=0.537,P=0.001)、PCT여N(r=0.432,P=0.011)、CRP여내독소(r=0.674,P=0.000)、내독소여WBC(r=0.197,P=0.024)균정정상관;이소유세균성혈류감염환자PCT여CRP(r=0.538,P=0.000)、PCT여내독소(r=0.740,P=0.000)、PCT여WBC (r=0.259,P=0.003)、CRP여내독소(r=0.579,P=0.000)、내독소여WBC(r=0.197,P=0.024)균정정상관.③ROC곡선분석현시:재G-균혈류감염소치농독증환자,PCT적AUC위0.825,최가진단림계치>2.455 μg/L시민감도71.4%、특이도96.2%; CRP적AUC위0.761,최가진단림계치>79.45 mg/L시민감도64.3%、특이도80.8%;내독소적AUC위0.797,최가진단림계치> 15.5 ng/L시민감도61.2%、특이도94.2%.재G+균혈류감염소치농독증환자,PCT적AUC위0.619,최가진단림계치> 1.585 μg/L시민감도41.2%、특이도82.7%;CRP적AUC위0.533,최가진단림계치>95.25 mg/L시민감도32.4%、특이도82.7%.결론 G-균혈류감염소치농독증환자PCT、CRP、내독소수평고우G+균혈류감염자,삼자연합검측유망성위조기판단혈류감염소치농독증급기병정엄중정도적지표.
Objective To investigate the expression of different inflammatory variables,such as procalcitonin (PCT),C-reactive protein (CRP),and endotoxin in septic patients with bacterial bloodstream infection,in order to assess the value of these variables in early diagnosis.Methods The clinical data of 132 bacterial bloodstream infection patients with clinical diagnosis of sepsis in intensive care unit (ICU) of Beijing Shijitan Hospital of Capital Medical University from February 2012 to May 2013 were analyzed retrospectively.Patients were divided into Gram-negative (G-) bacterial bloodstream infection group (n =98) and Gram-positive (G+) bacterial bloodstream infection group (n =34) according to the result of blood culture.The inflammatory variables including white blood cell (WBC) count,percentage of neutrophils (N),CRP,PCT and level of endotoxin in blood of both groups within 6 hours of bloodstream infection were compared,and their correlation was analyzed.The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of inflammatory variables for the diagnosis of bloodstream infection was plotted,and their diagnostic value for bloodstream infection was evaluated according to area under ROC curve (AUC),and finally the sensitivity and specificity of inflammatory variables for bloodstream infection were assessed based on the best diagnostic cut-off points.Results ① The levels of the variables,including PCT,CRP,and endotoxin content in the G-bacterial bloodstream infection group were significantly higher than that of G+ bacterial bloodstream infection group [PCT (μg/L):5.11 (0.99,18.00)vs.1.00 (0.36,2.73),Z=49.647,P=0.000; CRP (mg/L):111.5 ±57.4 vs.75.9 ±56.6,t=9.947,P=0.000;endotoxin (ng/L):18.00 (8.75,28.00) vs.5.00 (5.00,6.25),Z=52.333,P=0.000].There was no significant difference in WBC and N between two groups.② The results of the correlation coefficient of the inflammatory variables showed:in G-bacterial bloodstream infection group positive correlation was found between PCT and CRP (r=0.671,P=0.000),PCT and endotoxin (r=0.916,P=0.000),CRP and endotoxin (r=0.687,P=0.04).On the other hand,in G + bacterial bloodstream infection group,correlation was shown between PCT and CRP (r=0.620,P=0.000),PCT and endotoxin (r=0.487,P=0.010),PCT and WBC (r=0.537,P=0.001),PCT and N (r=0.432,P=0.011),CRP and endotoxin (r=0.674,P=0.000),endotoxin and WBC (r=0.197,P=0.024).In all of bloodstream infection patients positive correlation was found between PCT and CRP (r=0.538,P=0.000),PCT and endotoxin (r=0.740,P=0.000),PCT and WBC (r=0.259,P=0.003),CRP and endotoxin (r=0.579,P=0.000),endotoxin and WBC (r=0.197,P=0.024).③ The ROC curve in patients with the diagnosis of sepsis due to bloodstream infection showed that:in the G-bacterial bloodstream infection group,AUC for PCT was 0.825,sensitivity of 71.4% and specificity of 96.2% with the best cut-off value >2.455 μg/L; AUC for CRP was 0.761,sensitivity of 64.3% and specificity of 80.8% with the best cut-off value >79.45 mg/L; AUC for endotoxin was 0.797,sensitivity of 61.2% and specificity of 94.2% with the best cut-off value > 15.5 ng/L.In the G+ bacterial bloodstream infection group,AUC for PCT was 0.619,sensitivity of 41.2% and specificity of 82.7% with the best cut-off value > 1.585 μg/L; AUC for CRP was 0.533,sensitivity of 32.4% and specificity of 82.7% with the best cut-off value >95.25 mg/L.Conclusions The concentrations of PCT,CRP,and endotoxin in patients with G-bacterial bloodstream infection were significantly higher than those of G+ bacterial bloodstream infection group.They are valuable for the early diagnosis of bloodstream infection,and judgment of its severity,and it is more valuable with the combination of PCT,CRP,and endotoxin concentration determinations.