北京医学
北京醫學
북경의학
BEIJING MEDICAL JOURNAL
2014年
3期
171-173
,共3页
周一鸣%马丽%孟向红%王伟芳%曹建彪
週一鳴%馬麗%孟嚮紅%王偉芳%曹建彪
주일명%마려%맹향홍%왕위방%조건표
原发性胆汁性肝硬化%熊去氧胆酸%非诺贝特
原髮性膽汁性肝硬化%熊去氧膽痠%非諾貝特
원발성담즙성간경화%웅거양담산%비낙패특
Primary biliary cirrhosis(PBC)%Ursodeoxycholic acid(UDCA)%Fenofibrate
目的:评价熊去氧胆酸(UDCA)联合非诺贝特对UDCA反应不佳的胆汁性肝硬化(PBC)患者的疗效。方法选择熊去氧胆酸治疗1年疗效不佳的PBC患者14例,给予UDCA 15 mg/(kg·d),加非诺贝特0.16 g口服,治疗3个月。观察治疗前后患者症状、体征和肝功能生化指标的变化。结果治疗3个月后,71.4%(10/14)的PBC患者乏力症状明显减轻,57.1%(8/14)的患者皮肤瘙痒缓解,85.7%(12/14)的患者腹胀减轻,71.4%(10/14)的患者尿色变浅。治疗后较治疗前总胆红素[(43.1±19.6)μmol/L vs.(65.3±21.5)μmol/L]、直接胆红素[(38.3±11.0)μmol/L vs.(49.6±15.3)μmol/L]、总胆固醇[(5.36±1.82)mmol/L vs.(8.63±1.58)mmol/L]、γ-谷氨酰转肽酶[(155.6±86.3)U/L vs.(421.3±123.4) U/L]、碱性磷酸酶[(196.2±101.5)U/L vs.(395.1±156.3)U/L]、丙氨酸氨基转移酶[(42.5±18.9)U/L vs.(58.3±23.8)U/L]、天冬氨酸氨基转移酶[(40.3±25.6)U/L vs.(53.3±23.7)U/L]明显下降(P均<0.05);胆碱酯酶及白蛋白较前有上升,但差异无统计学意义(P >0.05)。结论对UDCA疗效不佳的PBC患者,UDCA联合非诺贝特可能有效改善患者的症状、体征及肝功能生化指标。
目的:評價熊去氧膽痠(UDCA)聯閤非諾貝特對UDCA反應不佳的膽汁性肝硬化(PBC)患者的療效。方法選擇熊去氧膽痠治療1年療效不佳的PBC患者14例,給予UDCA 15 mg/(kg·d),加非諾貝特0.16 g口服,治療3箇月。觀察治療前後患者癥狀、體徵和肝功能生化指標的變化。結果治療3箇月後,71.4%(10/14)的PBC患者乏力癥狀明顯減輕,57.1%(8/14)的患者皮膚瘙癢緩解,85.7%(12/14)的患者腹脹減輕,71.4%(10/14)的患者尿色變淺。治療後較治療前總膽紅素[(43.1±19.6)μmol/L vs.(65.3±21.5)μmol/L]、直接膽紅素[(38.3±11.0)μmol/L vs.(49.6±15.3)μmol/L]、總膽固醇[(5.36±1.82)mmol/L vs.(8.63±1.58)mmol/L]、γ-穀氨酰轉肽酶[(155.6±86.3)U/L vs.(421.3±123.4) U/L]、堿性燐痠酶[(196.2±101.5)U/L vs.(395.1±156.3)U/L]、丙氨痠氨基轉移酶[(42.5±18.9)U/L vs.(58.3±23.8)U/L]、天鼕氨痠氨基轉移酶[(40.3±25.6)U/L vs.(53.3±23.7)U/L]明顯下降(P均<0.05);膽堿酯酶及白蛋白較前有上升,但差異無統計學意義(P >0.05)。結論對UDCA療效不佳的PBC患者,UDCA聯閤非諾貝特可能有效改善患者的癥狀、體徵及肝功能生化指標。
목적:평개웅거양담산(UDCA)연합비낙패특대UDCA반응불가적담즙성간경화(PBC)환자적료효。방법선택웅거양담산치료1년료효불가적PBC환자14례,급여UDCA 15 mg/(kg·d),가비낙패특0.16 g구복,치료3개월。관찰치료전후환자증상、체정화간공능생화지표적변화。결과치료3개월후,71.4%(10/14)적PBC환자핍력증상명현감경,57.1%(8/14)적환자피부소양완해,85.7%(12/14)적환자복창감경,71.4%(10/14)적환자뇨색변천。치료후교치료전총담홍소[(43.1±19.6)μmol/L vs.(65.3±21.5)μmol/L]、직접담홍소[(38.3±11.0)μmol/L vs.(49.6±15.3)μmol/L]、총담고순[(5.36±1.82)mmol/L vs.(8.63±1.58)mmol/L]、γ-곡안선전태매[(155.6±86.3)U/L vs.(421.3±123.4) U/L]、감성린산매[(196.2±101.5)U/L vs.(395.1±156.3)U/L]、병안산안기전이매[(42.5±18.9)U/L vs.(58.3±23.8)U/L]、천동안산안기전이매[(40.3±25.6)U/L vs.(53.3±23.7)U/L]명현하강(P균<0.05);담감지매급백단백교전유상승,단차이무통계학의의(P >0.05)。결론대UDCA료효불가적PBC환자,UDCA연합비낙패특가능유효개선환자적증상、체정급간공능생화지표。
Objective To observe the clinical effects of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) combined with fenofibrate in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) partially responding to UDCA only therapy. Methods Fourteen patients with PBC partially responding to UDCA only therapy were treated with UDCA [15mg/(kg·d),2/d, oral] combined with fenofibrate (0.16g, 1/d,oral) for 3 months.The changes of clinical symptoms and physical signs were observed.The relevant biochemical indicators were detected before and after the treatment. Result Clinical symptoms and physical signs improved after treatment. There were 71.4% of patients improved in fatigue, 57.1% relieved in pruritus, 85.7% relieved in abdominal distension, 71.4% lighted in urine color. The levels of biochemical indicators after theray were improved than those of before therapy,such as T-BIL [(43.1±19.6)μmol/L vs. (65.3±21.5)μmol/L], D-BIL [(38.3±11.0)μmol/L vs. (49.6±15.3)μmol/L], TC[(5.36±1.82)mmol/L vs. (8.63±1.58)mmol/L], GGT [(155.6±86.3)U/L vs. (421.3±123.4)U/L]、ALP[(196.2±101.5)U/L vs. (395.1±156.3)U/L]、 ALT[(42.5±18.9)U/L vs. (58.3±23.8)U/L]、 AST[(40.3±25.6)U/L vs. (53.3±23.7)U/L], the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05). Conclusion UDCA combined with fenofibrate for patients with PBC partially responding to UDCA only therapy is effective.