CAJ | 학술논문

目的：了解目前两种护理分科的认可度,找出生命周期课程设置存在的问题,为今后教材的编写提供依据,为护理专业课程设置的改革设置疑问,引导思考。方法：采用自行设计的问卷,调查人民卫生出版社相关课程的编者和我院首届国培班学员对两种护理分科的认知状态和倾向性。结果：67.1%的教师倾向于临床分科,32.9%的教师倾向于生命周期分科。结论：生命周期课程设置存在问题较多,改革阻力较大,但已经渐渐深入人心。
목적：료해목전량충호리분과적인가도,조출생명주기과정설치존재적문제,위금후교재적편사제공의거,위호리전업과정설치적개혁설치의문,인도사고。방법：채용자행설계적문권,조사인민위생출판사상관과정적편자화아원수계국배반학원대량충호리분과적인지상태화경향성。결과：67.1%적교사경향우림상분과,32.9%적교사경향우생명주기분과。결론：생명주기과정설치존재문제교다,개혁조력교대,단이경점점심입인심。
Objective:To understand the acceptance of two kinds of nursing curriculum recently and find out the existing problems of setting the life cycle curriculum. In order to provide the basis for the compilation of teaching materials, set questions for nursing professional curriculum and guide thinking. Methods:A self- designed questionnaire, editors related courses from People’s Medical Publishing House and the first national training students was sueveyed about the two curriculum of cognitive status and tendency. Results:67. 1% teachers tend to clinical division,32. 9% teachers tend to life cycle di-vision. Conclusion:There are many problems in the setting of curriculum of life cycle,but has gradually win support among the people,although reform resist-ance are large.