CAJ | 학술논문

目的：比较临床医护人员使用传统的肥皂、洗手液、无水洗手液三种洗手用品洗手的效果。方法分别对三种洗手用品的效果进行细菌学监测并作统计学分析。结果肥皂、洗手液、无水洗手液洗手后平均菌数分别为10.1cfu/cm2、8.3cfu/cm2和3.6cfu/cm2。结论无水洗手液洗手效果优于传统的肥皂和洗手液，且方便、快速、高效，值得临床广泛推广。
목적：비교림상의호인원사용전통적비조、세수액、무수세수액삼충세수용품세수적효과。방법분별대삼충세수용품적효과진행세균학감측병작통계학분석。결과비조、세수액、무수세수액세수후평균균수분별위10.1cfu/cm2、8.3cfu/cm2화3.6cfu/cm2。결론무수세수액세수효과우우전통적비조화세수액，차방편、쾌속、고효，치득림상엄범추엄。
Objective To compare the hand-washing effects of traditional soap, hand sanitizer, waterless hand sanitizer used by clinical medical workers. Methods The effects of three hand-washing products received bacteriological monitoring and statistical analysis. Results The average bacterial counts of soap, hand sanitizer, waterless hand sanitizer were 10.1cfu/cm2, 8.3cfu/cm2 and 3.6cfu/cm2. Conclusion The hand-washing effect of waterless hand sanitizer is better than that of traditional soap and hand sanitizer, and it's convenient, fast and highly effective, thereby worthy of wide clinical promotion.