中国医药科学
中國醫藥科學
중국의약과학
CHINA MEDICINE AND PHARMACY
2014年
5期
162-163,174
,共3页
临床治疗%胫骨近端复杂性骨折%解剖钢板%LISS
臨床治療%脛骨近耑複雜性骨摺%解剖鋼闆%LISS
림상치료%경골근단복잡성골절%해부강판%LISS
Clinical treatment%Complex fractures of proximal tibia%Anatomical plate%LISS
目的:探析胫骨近端复杂性骨折应用解剖钢板及LISS钢板治疗的临床效果。方法入选我院胫骨近端复杂性骨折患者66例,按治疗方法的不同分为治疗组、对照组,各33例,治疗组实施LISS钢板疗法,对照组实施常规解剖钢板内固定疗法,比较两组的手术参数、临床效果及并发症情况。结果治疗组的手术参数显著优于对照组(P<0.05);两组患者临床疗效比较,差异有统计学意义;治疗组的并发症发生率低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论与解剖钢板相比,LISS钢板内固定治疗胫骨近端复杂性骨折具有创伤小、骨折愈合快、负重早及并发症少的优点,但两者的疗效相当。
目的:探析脛骨近耑複雜性骨摺應用解剖鋼闆及LISS鋼闆治療的臨床效果。方法入選我院脛骨近耑複雜性骨摺患者66例,按治療方法的不同分為治療組、對照組,各33例,治療組實施LISS鋼闆療法,對照組實施常規解剖鋼闆內固定療法,比較兩組的手術參數、臨床效果及併髮癥情況。結果治療組的手術參數顯著優于對照組(P<0.05);兩組患者臨床療效比較,差異有統計學意義;治療組的併髮癥髮生率低于對照組(P<0.05)。結論與解剖鋼闆相比,LISS鋼闆內固定治療脛骨近耑複雜性骨摺具有創傷小、骨摺愈閤快、負重早及併髮癥少的優點,但兩者的療效相噹。
목적:탐석경골근단복잡성골절응용해부강판급LISS강판치료적림상효과。방법입선아원경골근단복잡성골절환자66례,안치료방법적불동분위치료조、대조조,각33례,치료조실시LISS강판요법,대조조실시상규해부강판내고정요법,비교량조적수술삼수、림상효과급병발증정황。결과치료조적수술삼수현저우우대조조(P<0.05);량조환자림상료효비교,차이유통계학의의;치료조적병발증발생솔저우대조조(P<0.05)。결론여해부강판상비,LISS강판내고정치료경골근단복잡성골절구유창상소、골절유합쾌、부중조급병발증소적우점,단량자적료효상당。
Objective To discuss the clinical effects of LISS plate and anatomical plate for treatment of complex fractures of proximal tibia. Methods 66 patients with complex fractures of proximal tibia were chosen and divided into two groups both with 33 cases according to different treatment methods. Treatment group was given LISS plate therapy, while control group was given routine anatomical palte internal fixation therapy. Operation parameters, clinical effects and complications of the two groups were compared. Results Operation parameters of treatment group were obviously better than control group(P<0.05); significant differences existed between the two groups on clinical effects;occurrence rate of complications of treatment group was obviously lower than control group(P<0.05). Conclusion Compared with anatomical palte, LISS plate internal fixation for treatment of complex fractures of proximal tibia has advantages of smaller trauma, faster healing of fracture, earlier time of bearing load and fewer complications, but clinical effects of the two kinds of therapy are equal.