生态环境学报
生態環境學報
생태배경학보
ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT
2014年
7期
1245-1250
,共6页
饶欢欢%彭本荣%刘岩%郑苗壮
饒歡歡%彭本榮%劉巖%鄭苗壯
요환환%팽본영%류암%정묘장
生态补偿%生态损害%补偿与赔偿%环境责任
生態補償%生態損害%補償與賠償%環境責任
생태보상%생태손해%보상여배상%배경책임
ecological compensation%ecological damage%environmental liability
生态补偿是协调经济发展与环境保护的有效经济手段,在中国得到了广泛重视。由于受到学科范畴的限制,学术界和管理界对生态补偿的内涵、经济性质和法律性质还存在许多争论,关于生态损害的科学含义及与之对应的补偿与赔偿的法理基础尚有待完善。本文旨在梳理生态补偿的相关术语,探讨生态损害及损害补偿与赔偿的科学含义、法理差异及法律制度,从而为我国进一步开展生态补偿的理论研究和实践提供参考。论文首先从环境管理、环境经济学以及法学三层面对生态补偿的内涵进行分析,并在探究生态补偿实践的演变历程的基础上,提出生态补偿至少包含生态保护补偿、生态损害补偿与生态损害赔偿三个方面的内容;其次,文章对生态损害的科学和法律含义进行了辨析,提出:1)生态损害补偿中的生态损害是指人类活动对自由的自然资源的损害,即初级生态损害;2)从法学角度来看,生态损害可分为过错行为导致的生态损害、非过错行为导致的生态损害以及历史累积污染导致的生态损害;3)补偿与赔偿在法理上存在发生的基础、性质、承担责任的时间、承担责任的方式以及程序等方面的差别;4)在以上基础上,论文探讨不同行为造成的生态损害的责任方应当承担补偿/赔偿责任。第三,论文从归责原则、责任主体、补偿/赔偿范围、方式以及补偿/赔偿金额的计算等方面对建立和实施生态损害补偿与赔偿的法律基础和制度进行了论述与分析。最后,论文提出了完善生态损害补偿/赔偿制度的政策建议。
生態補償是協調經濟髮展與環境保護的有效經濟手段,在中國得到瞭廣汎重視。由于受到學科範疇的限製,學術界和管理界對生態補償的內涵、經濟性質和法律性質還存在許多爭論,關于生態損害的科學含義及與之對應的補償與賠償的法理基礎尚有待完善。本文旨在梳理生態補償的相關術語,探討生態損害及損害補償與賠償的科學含義、法理差異及法律製度,從而為我國進一步開展生態補償的理論研究和實踐提供參攷。論文首先從環境管理、環境經濟學以及法學三層麵對生態補償的內涵進行分析,併在探究生態補償實踐的縯變歷程的基礎上,提齣生態補償至少包含生態保護補償、生態損害補償與生態損害賠償三箇方麵的內容;其次,文章對生態損害的科學和法律含義進行瞭辨析,提齣:1)生態損害補償中的生態損害是指人類活動對自由的自然資源的損害,即初級生態損害;2)從法學角度來看,生態損害可分為過錯行為導緻的生態損害、非過錯行為導緻的生態損害以及歷史纍積汙染導緻的生態損害;3)補償與賠償在法理上存在髮生的基礎、性質、承擔責任的時間、承擔責任的方式以及程序等方麵的差彆;4)在以上基礎上,論文探討不同行為造成的生態損害的責任方應噹承擔補償/賠償責任。第三,論文從歸責原則、責任主體、補償/賠償範圍、方式以及補償/賠償金額的計算等方麵對建立和實施生態損害補償與賠償的法律基礎和製度進行瞭論述與分析。最後,論文提齣瞭完善生態損害補償/賠償製度的政策建議。
생태보상시협조경제발전여배경보호적유효경제수단,재중국득도료엄범중시。유우수도학과범주적한제,학술계화관리계대생태보상적내함、경제성질화법률성질환존재허다쟁론,관우생태손해적과학함의급여지대응적보상여배상적법리기출상유대완선。본문지재소리생태보상적상관술어,탐토생태손해급손해보상여배상적과학함의、법리차이급법률제도,종이위아국진일보개전생태보상적이론연구화실천제공삼고。논문수선종배경관리、배경경제학이급법학삼층면대생태보상적내함진행분석,병재탐구생태보상실천적연변역정적기출상,제출생태보상지소포함생태보호보상、생태손해보상여생태손해배상삼개방면적내용;기차,문장대생태손해적과학화법률함의진행료변석,제출:1)생태손해보상중적생태손해시지인류활동대자유적자연자원적손해,즉초급생태손해;2)종법학각도래간,생태손해가분위과착행위도치적생태손해、비과착행위도치적생태손해이급역사루적오염도치적생태손해;3)보상여배상재법리상존재발생적기출、성질、승담책임적시간、승담책임적방식이급정서등방면적차별;4)재이상기출상,논문탐토불동행위조성적생태손해적책임방응당승담보상/배상책임。제삼,논문종귀책원칙、책임주체、보상/배상범위、방식이급보상/배상금액적계산등방면대건립화실시생태손해보상여배상적법률기출화제도진행료논술여분석。최후,논문제출료완선생태손해보상/배상제도적정책건의。
As an effective and efficient economic instrument to balance the economic development and environmental protection, the ecological compensation has attracted broad attention and application in China. Nevertheless, there exist many arguments in academic and management communities about the connotation and economic and legal character of ecological compensation due to the different context in different disciplines. There is an urgent need to clarify the scientific implication of ecological damage and the associated jurisprudential distinctions between remediation (Buchang) and compensation (Peichang) to promote the implementation of ecological compensation. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to explore the scientific implication, jurisprudential differences and legal regime of ecological damage and compensation based on the review of relative terms of ecological compensation, which then to provide references for further theoretical study and practice of ecological compensation in China. Firstly, the paper analyzed the connotation of ecological compensation from perspectives of environmental management, environmental economics and law, reviewed the evolution of ecological compensation practices in China, the paper and concluded that the ecological compensation should at least includes payments for ecosystem services (PES), ecological damage compensation and ecological damage claim. Secondly, this paper analyzed the scientific and legal connotation of ecological damage: (1) the ecological damage is the harmful effect to a free natural resource resulted from human activities, namely primary ecological damage;(2) the ecological damage can be categorized three groups, damage resulted from wrongful acts, non-wrongful acts and accumulative pollution from the perspective of legal theory;(3) the occurrence basis, legal nature, time and pattern of undertaking responsibility and the applicable law are different between the remediation and compensation; 4) the responsible parties should take the different liability according to the different acts. Thirdly, the paper discussed the legal basis and regime of establishing and implementing ecological compensation from the principle of liability fixation, the subject of the tort, the range and ways of compensation/ damage, the calculation of the amount of compensation/ damage, and so on. Lastly, the paper proposed policy suggestions of refining the current ecological damage compensation legal system.