河北医学
河北醫學
하북의학
HEBEI MEDICINE
2014年
7期
1086-1088,1089
,共4页
李水云%曾勇梅%吴萍%张林
李水雲%曾勇梅%吳萍%張林
리수운%증용매%오평%장림
广泛子宫切除术%淋巴结清扫术%腹腔镜%开腹手术%早期宫颈癌
廣汎子宮切除術%淋巴結清掃術%腹腔鏡%開腹手術%早期宮頸癌
엄범자궁절제술%림파결청소술%복강경%개복수술%조기궁경암
Radical hysterectomy%Lymph node dissection%Laparoscopic surgery%Open surger-y%Early stage cervical cancer
目的:探讨腹腔镜下广泛子宫切除联合盆腔淋巴结清扫术治疗早期宫颈癌的近期临床疗效及安全性。方法:选取符合标准的患者80例,随机分为观察组和对照组各40例,对照组应用开腹广泛子宫切除术加盆腔淋巴结清扫术,观察组应用腹腔镜下广泛子宫切除联合盆腔淋巴结清扫术,比较二者临床治疗效果。结果:观察组患者手术时间长于对照组,但术中出血量、术后肛门排气时间、下床活动时间、拔除引流管时间、术后镇痛药使用率及术后住院时间等方面,均优于对照组,差异存在显著性( P<0.05)。两组患者淋巴结清扫数目及并发症发生率相似,差异无统计学意义( P>0.05)。术前两组患者FACT-G评分相似,差异无统计学意义( P>0.05);术后3个月及6个月,两组患者FACT-G评分较术前均提高,差异存在显著性( P<0.05),但是观察组患者改善更显著( P<0.05)。结论:腹腔镜下广泛子宫切除联合盆腔淋巴结清扫术治疗早期宫颈癌近期临床疗效确切,手术创伤小、术后恢复快、安全可靠、有利于患者术后康复及提高生存质量。
目的:探討腹腔鏡下廣汎子宮切除聯閤盆腔淋巴結清掃術治療早期宮頸癌的近期臨床療效及安全性。方法:選取符閤標準的患者80例,隨機分為觀察組和對照組各40例,對照組應用開腹廣汎子宮切除術加盆腔淋巴結清掃術,觀察組應用腹腔鏡下廣汎子宮切除聯閤盆腔淋巴結清掃術,比較二者臨床治療效果。結果:觀察組患者手術時間長于對照組,但術中齣血量、術後肛門排氣時間、下床活動時間、拔除引流管時間、術後鎮痛藥使用率及術後住院時間等方麵,均優于對照組,差異存在顯著性( P<0.05)。兩組患者淋巴結清掃數目及併髮癥髮生率相似,差異無統計學意義( P>0.05)。術前兩組患者FACT-G評分相似,差異無統計學意義( P>0.05);術後3箇月及6箇月,兩組患者FACT-G評分較術前均提高,差異存在顯著性( P<0.05),但是觀察組患者改善更顯著( P<0.05)。結論:腹腔鏡下廣汎子宮切除聯閤盆腔淋巴結清掃術治療早期宮頸癌近期臨床療效確切,手術創傷小、術後恢複快、安全可靠、有利于患者術後康複及提高生存質量。
목적:탐토복강경하엄범자궁절제연합분강림파결청소술치료조기궁경암적근기림상료효급안전성。방법:선취부합표준적환자80례,수궤분위관찰조화대조조각40례,대조조응용개복엄범자궁절제술가분강림파결청소술,관찰조응용복강경하엄범자궁절제연합분강림파결청소술,비교이자림상치료효과。결과:관찰조환자수술시간장우대조조,단술중출혈량、술후항문배기시간、하상활동시간、발제인류관시간、술후진통약사용솔급술후주원시간등방면,균우우대조조,차이존재현저성( P<0.05)。량조환자림파결청소수목급병발증발생솔상사,차이무통계학의의( P>0.05)。술전량조환자FACT-G평분상사,차이무통계학의의( P>0.05);술후3개월급6개월,량조환자FACT-G평분교술전균제고,차이존재현저성( P<0.05),단시관찰조환자개선경현저( P<0.05)。결론:복강경하엄범자궁절제연합분강림파결청소술치료조기궁경암근기림상료효학절,수술창상소、술후회복쾌、안전가고、유리우환자술후강복급제고생존질량。
Objective:To investigate the safety and short-term clinical effects of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy combined with pelvic lymph node dissection in treatment of early stage cervical cancer .Meth-od:80 eligible patients were selected and randomly divided into observation group and control group , 40 pa-tients in each group;the control group used open radical hysterectomy combined with pelvic lymph node dis-section , while the observation group used laparoscopic radical hysterectomy combined with pelvic lymph node dissection , and the clinical therapeutic effects of the two groups were compared .Result:In the patients of the observation group , the operative time was longer than that of the control group , but the intra-operative blood loss, postoperative time of passage of gas by anus , out-of-bed activity time, time of extubating drainage tube, postoperative analgesics use percentage and postoperative length of stay and so on were all better than those of the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05).The numbers of dis-sected lymph nodes and complications of the two groups were similar , and the differences were statistically insignificant ( P>0.05) .The FACT-G scores of the patients of the two groups before the surgeries were simi-lar, and the difference was statistically insignificant ( P>0.05);in 3 months and 6 months after the surger-ies, the FACT-G scores of the patients of both groups were higher than those before the surgeries , and the differences were statistically significant ( P<0.05 ) , but those of the patients of the observation group were improved more significantly ( P<0.05) .Conclusion:Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy combined with pelvic lymph node dissection in treatment of early stage cervical cancer has positive short -term clinical therapeutic effects, small operation wound and rapid postoperative recovery , It is safe and reliable , and consequently is beneficial to the postoperative rehabilitation and elevating quality of life of the patients .